linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, timmurray@google.com,
	joelaf@google.com, surenb@google.com,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	"Dennis Zhou (Facebook)" <dennisszhou@gmail.com>,
	Prashant Dhamdhere <pdhamdhe@redhat.com>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Document /proc/pid PID reuse behavior
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 09:16:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181107171644.GK3074@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181106060113.GA4499@rapoport-lnx>

On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:01:13AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> > index 12a5e6e693b6..0b14460f721d 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> > @@ -125,6 +125,13 @@ process running on the system, which is named after the process ID (PID).
> >  The link  self  points  to  the  process reading the file system. Each process
> >  subdirectory has the entries listed in Table 1-1.
> >  
> > +Note that an open a file descriptor to /proc/<pid> or to any of its

"open file descriptor" (the "a" is unnecessary)

> > +contained files or subdirectories does not prevent <pid> being reused
> > +for some other process in the event that <pid> exits. Operations on
> > +open /proc/<pid> file descriptors corresponding to dead processes
> > +never act on any new process that the kernel may, through chance, have
> > +also assigned the process ID <pid>. Instead, operations on these FDs
> > +usually fail with ESRCH.

The paragraph is a bit wordy.  More pithy:

An open file descriptor for /proc/<pid> (or any of the files or
subdirectories in it) does not prevent <pid> from being reused after
the process exits.  Operations on a file descriptor referring to a dead
process usually return ESRCH.  They do not act on any new process which
has been assigned the same <pid>.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-07 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-31 15:06 [PATCH] Document /proc/pid PID reuse behavior Daniel Colascione
2018-11-01  7:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2018-11-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v2] " Daniel Colascione
2018-11-06  6:01   ` Mike Rapoport
2018-11-07 17:16     ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2018-11-07 18:21       ` Daniel Colascione
2018-11-06 13:05   ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-07 15:48     ` Daniel Colascione
2018-11-07 16:00       ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-07 16:10         ` Daniel Colascione
2018-11-07 16:19           ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-19 11:16           ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-11-07 17:04         ` Martin Steigerwald
2018-11-08 12:02           ` David Laight
2018-11-08 12:27             ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-11-08 13:42               ` David Laight
2018-11-08 14:07                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-11-08 14:14                   ` David Laight
2018-11-08 13:25           ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-19 10:54   ` Pavel Machek
2018-11-19 16:24     ` Daniel Colascione
2018-11-20  8:50       ` Pavel Machek
2018-11-20  9:05     ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-11-20  9:18       ` Pavel Machek
2018-11-20 17:39         ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-11-20 17:48           ` Daniel Colascione
2018-11-20 17:59             ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-11-20 16:37       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-11-20 16:49       ` Jonathan Corbet
2018-11-20 16:57         ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181107171644.GK3074@bombadil.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dancol@google.com \
    --cc=dennisszhou@gmail.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pdhamdhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=timmurray@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).