Re: [PATCH RFC 01/15] MIPS: replace **** with a hug

From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
	James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>, Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>,
	"open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/15] MIPS: replace **** with a hug
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:50:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181130215003.GH23772@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ba4d08d-10d1-c233-476a-c73051b8c9f5@suse.com>

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:06:30PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> I find it quite ridiculous that grown up people are engaging at yet
> another coc-related conversation and are on the way to blowing it out of
> proportions. Let's focus on improving the ACTUAL code what's the point
> to bikeshed on the word?
> 
> I've seen people before me comment that some comments are plainly out of
> date and that warrants their removal but otherwise nitpicking things
> like that. It seems common sense is very scant these days...

I have absolutely nothing against CoC.

If you look up from LKML, there total zero posts from criticizing of
having such. OK, maybe I find it bit too high-level, and yeah, this
patch set has been useful to know where the line is. I can go through
the commits and think more appropriate alternatives (thus the RFC-tag).

Thanks.

/Jarkko