linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	sebott@linux.ibm.com, oberpar@linux.ibm.com,
	freude@linux.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zcrypt: handle AP Info notification from CHSC SEI command
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 10:55:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190131105555.4af6d8ea.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1548870526-30595-1-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>

On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 12:48:46 -0500
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> The current AP bus implementation periodically polls the AP configuration
> to detect changes. When the AP configuration is dynamically changed via the
> SE or an SCLP instruction, the changes will not be reflected to sysfs until
> the next time the AP configuration is polled. The CHSC architecture
> provides a Store Event Information (SEI)command to make notification of an

missing blank ---------------------------^

> AP configuration change. This patch introduces a handler to process
> notification from the CHSC SEI command BY immediately kickING off an AP bus

s/BY/by/

s/kickING/kicking/

> scan.

Scan-after-event sounds useful, yeah.

Two questions:
- Does the event cover _any_ change to the AP configuration, or can the
  periodic scan detect changes that are not signaled?
- Do we want to generate such an event in QEMU on plugging/unplugging
  the vfio-ap device?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/include/asm/ap.h   | 12 ++++++++++++
>  drivers/s390/cio/chsc.c      | 12 ++++++++++++
>  drivers/s390/cio/chsc.h      |  1 +
>  drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/ap.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/ap.h
> index 1a6a7092d942..c778593d509f 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/ap.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/ap.h
> @@ -360,4 +360,16 @@ static inline struct ap_queue_status ap_dqap(ap_qid_t qid,
>  	return reg1;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Interface to tell the AP bus code that a configuration
> + * change has happened. The bus code should at least do
> + * an ap bus resource rescan.
> + */
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZCRYPT)
> +void ap_bus_cfg_chg(void);
> +#else
> +#error "no CONFIG_ZCRYPT"

That #error looks like a development debugging leftover.

> +static void ap_bus_cfg_chg(void){};
> +#endif
> +
>  #endif /* _ASM_S390_AP_H_ */
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/chsc.c b/drivers/s390/cio/chsc.c
> index a0baee25134c..dccccc337078 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/chsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/chsc.c
> @@ -586,6 +586,15 @@ static void chsc_process_sei_scm_avail(struct chsc_sei_nt0_area *sei_area)
>  			      " failed (rc=%d).\n", ret);
>  }
>  
> +static void chsc_process_sei_ap_cfg_chg(struct chsc_sei_nt0_area *sei_area)
> +{
> +	CIO_CRW_EVENT(3, "chsc: ap config changed\n");
> +	if (sei_area->rs != 5)
> +		return;

I'm guessing that a reporting source of 5 means ap, right? (The code is
silent on all those magic rs values :/)

If so, should the debug logging be moved after the check?

> +
> +	ap_bus_cfg_chg();
> +}
> +
>  static void chsc_process_sei_nt2(struct chsc_sei_nt2_area *sei_area)
>  {
>  	switch (sei_area->cc) {
> @@ -612,6 +621,9 @@ static void chsc_process_sei_nt0(struct chsc_sei_nt0_area *sei_area)
>  	case 2: /* i/o resource accessibility */
>  		chsc_process_sei_res_acc(sei_area);
>  		break;
> +	case 3: /* ap config changed */
> +		chsc_process_sei_ap_cfg_chg(sei_area);
> +		break;
>  	case 7: /* channel-path-availability information */
>  		chsc_process_sei_chp_avail(sei_area);
>  		break;
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/chsc.h b/drivers/s390/cio/chsc.h
> index 78aba8d94eec..5651066c46e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/chsc.h
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/chsc.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>  #include <asm/chsc.h>
>  #include <asm/schid.h>
>  #include <asm/qdio.h>
> +#include <asm/ap.h>

I would probably include this in chsc.c instead.

>  
>  #define CHSC_SDA_OC_MSS   0x2
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c
> index 48ea0004a56d..94f621783d6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
>  #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>  #include <linux/debugfs.h>
>  #include <linux/ctype.h>
> +#include <asm/crw.h>

Why are you adding this #include?

>  
>  #include "ap_bus.h"
>  #include "ap_debug.h"
> @@ -860,6 +861,17 @@ void ap_bus_force_rescan(void)
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(ap_bus_force_rescan);
>  
>  /*
> +* A config change has happened, Force an ap bus rescan.

s/Force/force/

> +*/
> +void ap_bus_cfg_chg(void)
> +{
> +	AP_DBF(DBF_INFO, "%s config change, forcing bus rescan\n", __func__);
> +
> +	ap_bus_force_rescan();
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ap_bus_cfg_chg);
> +
> +/*
>   * hex2bitmap() - parse hex mask string and set bitmap.
>   * Valid strings are "0x012345678" with at least one valid hex number.
>   * Rest of the bitmap to the right is padded with 0. No spaces allowed


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-01-31  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-30 17:48 [PATCH] zcrypt: handle AP Info notification from CHSC SEI command Tony Krowiak
2019-01-30 18:32 ` Sebastian Ott
2019-01-31 23:28   ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-01  9:01     ` Heiko Carstens
2019-02-01 11:08       ` Martin Schwidefsky
2019-02-01 13:05       ` Heiko Carstens
2019-02-01 15:40         ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-01 15:38       ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-04 10:06         ` Harald Freudenberger
2019-02-05 20:26           ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-04 10:01     ` Sebastian Ott
2019-02-05 20:27       ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-21 10:42   ` Harald Freudenberger
2019-02-21 12:12     ` Cornelia Huck
2019-02-21 12:55       ` Heiko Carstens
2019-01-31  9:09 ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-31 23:32   ` Tony Krowiak
2019-01-31  9:23 ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-31  9:55 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2019-01-31 23:50   ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-01 14:35     ` Cornelia Huck
2019-02-01 15:50       ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-04 10:15       ` Harald Freudenberger
2019-02-04 12:07         ` Cornelia Huck
2019-02-05 20:30         ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-03  9:25 ` kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190131105555.4af6d8ea.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=sebott@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).