From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 02/16] arm64/cpufeature: Drop TraceFilt feature exposure from ID_DFR0 register
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 21:24:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200504202453.GA5012@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1588426445-24344-3-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 07:03:51PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> ID_DFR0 based TraceFilt feature should not be exposed to guests. Hence lets
> drop it.
>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>
> Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 6d032fbe416f..51386dade423 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -435,7 +435,6 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_pfr1[] = {
> };
>
> static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_dfr0[] = {
> - ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 28, 4, 0),
Hmm, this still confuses me. Is this not now FTR_NONSTRICT? Why is that ok?
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-04 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-02 13:33 [PATCH V3 00/16] arm64/cpufeature: Introduce ID_PFR2, ID_DFR1, ID_MMFR5 and other changes Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-02 13:33 ` [PATCH V3 01/16] arm64/cpufeature: Add explicit ftr_id_isar0[] for ID_ISAR0 register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-02 13:33 ` [PATCH V3 02/16] arm64/cpufeature: Drop TraceFilt feature exposure from ID_DFR0 register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-04 20:24 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2020-05-05 6:50 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-05 10:42 ` Will Deacon
2020-05-08 4:25 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-02 13:33 ` [PATCH V3 03/16] arm64/cpufeature: Make doublelock a signed feature in ID_AA64DFR0 Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-05 11:10 ` Will Deacon
2020-05-08 4:59 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-02 13:33 ` [PATCH V3 04/16] arm64/cpufeature: Introduce ID_PFR2 CPU register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-05 11:12 ` Will Deacon
2020-05-05 11:16 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-05 11:18 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-05 11:27 ` Will Deacon
2020-05-05 11:50 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-05 12:12 ` Will Deacon
2020-05-05 12:49 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-08 8:32 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-02 13:33 ` [PATCH V3 05/16] arm64/cpufeature: Introduce ID_DFR1 " Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-03 21:35 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-02 13:33 ` [PATCH V3 06/16] arm64/cpufeature: Introduce ID_MMFR5 " Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-04 20:33 ` Will Deacon
2020-05-05 7:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-02 13:33 ` [PATCH V3 07/16] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_PFR0 register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-02 13:33 ` [PATCH V3 08/16] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_MMFR4 register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-05 11:14 ` Will Deacon
2020-05-06 6:43 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-02 13:33 ` [PATCH V3 09/16] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_AA64ISAR0 register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-05 4:54 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-05 7:06 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-02 13:33 ` [PATCH V3 10/16] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_AA64PFR0 register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-05 4:59 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-06 6:35 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-02 13:34 ` [PATCH V3 11/16] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_AA64PFR1 register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-05 9:24 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-05-06 6:33 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-02 13:34 ` [PATCH V3 12/16] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_AA64MMFR0 register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-02 13:34 ` [PATCH V3 13/16] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_AA64MMFR1 register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-02 13:34 ` [PATCH V3 14/16] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_AA64MMFR2 register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-02 13:34 ` [PATCH V3 15/16] arm64/cpufeature: Add remaining feature bits in ID_AA64DFR0 register Anshuman Khandual
2020-05-02 13:34 ` [PATCH V3 16/16] arm64/cpufeature: Replace all open bits shift encodings with macros Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200504202453.GA5012@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).