Re: [PATCH V3 04/16] arm64/cpufeature: Introduce ID_PFR2 CPU register

[Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>]

On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 12:16:07PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 12:12:41PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 07:03:53PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > > This adds basic building blocks required for ID_PFR2 CPU register which
> > > provides information about the AArch32 programmers model which must be
> > > interpreted along with ID_PFR0 and ID_PFR1 CPU registers. This is added
> > > per ARM DDI 0487F.a specification.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > > Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> > > Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > 
> > > Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h    |  1 +
> > >  arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h |  4 ++++
> > >  arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c  | 11 +++++++++++
> > >  arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c     |  1 +
> > >  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c       |  2 +-
> > >  5 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
> > > index b4a40535a3d8..464e828a994d 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
> > > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct cpuinfo_arm64 {
> > >  	u32		reg_id_mmfr3;
> > >  	u32		reg_id_pfr0;
> > >  	u32		reg_id_pfr1;
> > > +	u32		reg_id_pfr2;
> > >  
> > >  	u32		reg_mvfr0;
> > >  	u32		reg_mvfr1;
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> > > index e5317a6367b6..c977449e02db 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> > > @@ -153,6 +153,7 @@
> > >  #define SYS_MVFR0_EL1			sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 3, 0)
> > >  #define SYS_MVFR1_EL1			sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 3, 1)
> > >  #define SYS_MVFR2_EL1			sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 3, 2)
> > > +#define SYS_ID_PFR2_EL1			sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 3, 4)
> > 
> > nit: but please group these defines by name rather than encoding.
> 
> So far we've *always* grouped these by encoding in this file, so can we
> keep things that way for now? Otherwise we're inconsistent with both
> schemes.

Hmm, but it's really hard to read sorted that way and we'll end up with
duplicate definitions like we had for some of the field offsets already.
The only ID register that seems to be out of place atm is MMFR4, which I
can move (see below)

Will

--->8

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
index 2dd3f4ca9780..137201ea383b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
@@ -140,6 +140,7 @@
 #define SYS_ID_MMFR1_EL1		sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 1, 5)
 #define SYS_ID_MMFR2_EL1		sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 1, 6)
 #define SYS_ID_MMFR3_EL1		sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 1, 7)
+#define SYS_ID_MMFR4_EL1		sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 2, 6)
 
 #define SYS_ID_ISAR0_EL1		sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 2, 0)
 #define SYS_ID_ISAR1_EL1		sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 2, 1)
@@ -147,7 +148,6 @@
 #define SYS_ID_ISAR3_EL1		sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 2, 3)
 #define SYS_ID_ISAR4_EL1		sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 2, 4)
 #define SYS_ID_ISAR5_EL1		sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 2, 5)
-#define SYS_ID_MMFR4_EL1		sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 2, 6)
 #define SYS_ID_ISAR6_EL1		sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 2, 7)
 
 #define SYS_MVFR0_EL1			sys_reg(3, 0, 0, 3, 0)