linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: bbhatt@codeaurora.org
Cc: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, hemantk@codeaurora.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] bus: mhi: core: Remove warnings for missing MODULE_LICENSE()
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 19:37:13 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200921140713.GE3262@Mani-XPS-13-9360> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4506782e8bb9a50d80b4a40575ae532e@codeaurora.org>

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:48:21AM -0700, bbhatt@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2020-09-18 10:18, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 09:49:05AM -0700, bbhatt@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > > On 2020-09-18 07:27, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > > > On 9/17/2020 4:19 PM, Bhaumik Bhatt wrote:
> > > > > When building MHI as a module, missing MODULE_LICENSE() warnings
> > > > > are seen. Avoid them by adding the license and description
> > > > > information for the files where the warnings are seen.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@codeaurora.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >   drivers/bus/mhi/core/boot.c | 3 +++
> > > > >   drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c | 3 +++
> > > > >   drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c   | 3 +++
> > > > >   3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/boot.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/boot.c
> > > > > index 24422f5..78140cc 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/boot.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/boot.c
> > > > > @@ -523,3 +523,6 @@ void mhi_fw_load_handler(struct mhi_controller
> > > > > *mhi_cntrl)
> > > > >   error_alloc_fw_table:
> > > > >   	release_firmware(firmware);
> > > > >   }
> > > > > +
> > > > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> > > > > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MHI Host Interface");
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
> > > > > index 2cff5dd..172026f 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
> > > > > @@ -1533,3 +1533,6 @@ int mhi_poll(struct mhi_device *mhi_dev, u32
> > > > > budget)
> > > > >   	return ret;
> > > > >   }
> > > > >   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mhi_poll);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> > > > > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MHI Host Interface");
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c
> > > > > index ce4d969..72c3dbc 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c
> > > > > @@ -1150,3 +1150,6 @@ void mhi_device_put(struct mhi_device *mhi_dev)
> > > > >   	read_unlock_bh(&mhi_cntrl->pm_lock);
> > > > >   }
> > > > >   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mhi_device_put);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> > > > > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MHI Host Interface");
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I would expect you only need to add the MODULE_* once per module, in
> > > > which case main.c is probably the only place that needs it.
> > > 
> > > Hi Jeff,
> > > 
> > > I thought so too. This is to fix below warnings seen when building
> > > MHI as a
> > > MODULE:
> > > 
> > > WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in
> > > drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.o
> > > WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in
> > > drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.o
> > > WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in
> > > drivers/bus/mhi/core/boot.o
> > > 
> > > We've only had those in init.c so far.
> > > 
> > 
> > Can you please test below diff to see if it fixes the warning?
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/Makefile
> > b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/Makefile
> > index 66e2700c9032..bc1469778cf8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/Makefile
> > @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_MHI_BUS) := mhi.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_MHI_BUS) += mhi.o
> > 
> >  mhi-y := init.o main.o pm.o boot.o
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Mani
> > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Bhaumik
> > > 
> > > 'The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
> > > Forum,\na Linux Foundation Collaborative Project'
> Hi Mani,
> 
> Yes I was just about to reply. I realized it was due to the Makefile change.
> I have fixed and
> tested it. The warnings are gone now. I will remove the patch.
> 

Where is the patch fixing this issue? I couldn't find it in my inbox.
I'll just post one as I need to send out the PR today.

Thanks,
Mani

> Thanks,
> Bhaumik
> 
> 'The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
> Forum,\na Linux Foundation Collaborative Project'

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-21 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-17 22:19 [PATCH v1 0/3] Debugfs and Sysfs entries for MHI Bhaumik Bhatt
2020-09-17 22:19 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] bus: mhi: core: Remove warnings for missing MODULE_LICENSE() Bhaumik Bhatt
2020-09-18 14:27   ` Jeffrey Hugo
2020-09-18 16:49     ` bbhatt
2020-09-18 17:18       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-09-18 18:48         ` bbhatt
2020-09-21 14:07           ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2020-09-17 22:19 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] bus: mhi: core: Introduce debugfs entries for MHI Bhaumik Bhatt
2020-09-17 23:36   ` Randy Dunlap
2020-09-18 17:08     ` bbhatt
2020-09-17 22:19 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] bus: mhi: core: Introduce sysfs " Bhaumik Bhatt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200921140713.GE3262@Mani-XPS-13-9360 \
    --to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=bbhatt@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=hemantk@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).