linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	"Kelley, Sean V" <sean.v.kelley@intel.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/9] cxl/mem: Initialize the mailbox interface
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 15:22:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201117152236.000017eb@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201111054356.793390-7-ben.widawsky@intel.com>

On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 21:43:53 -0800
Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:

> Provide enough functionality to utilize the mailbox of a memory device.
> The mailbox is used to interact with the firmware running on the memory
> device.
> 
> The CXL specification defines separate capabilities for the mailbox and the
> memory device. While we can confirm the mailbox is ready, in order to actually
> interact with the memory device, the driver must also confirm the device's
> firmware is ready.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Hi Ben,

A few minor suggestions.

J
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/cxl/mem.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> index 02858ae63d6d..482fc9cdc890 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -19,14 +19,41 @@
>  #define CXLDEV_MB_CAPS 0x00
>  #define   CXLDEV_MB_CAP_PAYLOAD_SIZE(cap) ((cap) & 0x1F)
>  #define CXLDEV_MB_CTRL 0x04
> +#define   CXLDEV_MB_CTRL_DOORBELL BIT(0)
>  #define CXLDEV_MB_CMD 0x08
>  #define CXLDEV_MB_STATUS 0x10
>  #define CXLDEV_MB_BG_CMD_STATUS 0x18
>  
> +/* Memory Device */
> +#define CXLMDEV_STATUS 0
As mentioned earlier, I'd make sure there is a clear way of telling what is a
register/memory offset and what is a field.

> +#define CXLMDEV_DEV_FATAL BIT(0)
> +#define CXLMDEV_FW_HALT BIT(1)
> +#define CXLMDEV_MEDIA_STATUS_SHIFT 2
> +#define CXLMDEV_MEDIA_STATUS_MASK 0x3

Problem with masks defined like this is it's not apparent from name if they
are pre or post shift.  Could we use FIELD_GET etc and GENMASK to
ensure there is only one unambiguous definition?

> +#define CXLMDEV_READY(status)                                                  \
> +	((((status) >> CXLMDEV_MEDIA_STATUS_SHIFT) &                           \
> +	  CXLMDEV_MEDIA_STATUS_MASK) == CXLMDEV_MS_READY)
> +#define CXLMDEV_MS_NOT_READY 0
> +#define CXLMDEV_MS_READY 1
> +#define CXLMDEV_MS_ERROR 2
> +#define CXLMDEV_MS_DISABLED 3
> +#define CXLMDEV_MBOX_IF_READY BIT(4)
> +#define CXLMDEV_RESET_NEEDED_SHIFT 5
> +#define CXLMDEV_RESET_NEEDED_MASK 0x7
> +#define CXLMDEV_RESET_NEEDED(status)                                           \
> +	(((status) >> CXLMDEV_RESET_NEEDED_SHIFT) & CXLMDEV_RESET_NEEDED_MASK)
> +#define CXLMDEV_RESET_NEEDED_NOT 0
> +#define CXLMDEV_RESET_NEEDED_COLD 1
> +#define CXLMDEV_RESET_NEEDED_WARM 2
> +#define CXLMDEV_RESET_NEEDED_HOT 3
> +#define CXLMDEV_RESET_NEEDED_CXL 4
> +
>  struct cxl_mem {
>  	struct pci_dev *pdev;
>  	void __iomem *regs;
>  
> +	spinlock_t mbox_lock; /* Protects device mailbox and firmware */
> +
>  	/* Cap 0000h */
>  	struct {
>  		void __iomem *regs;
> @@ -72,6 +99,7 @@ struct cxl_mem {
>  
>  cxl_reg(status)
>  cxl_reg(mbox)
> +cxl_reg(mem)
>  
>  static inline u32 __cxl_raw_read_reg32(struct cxl_mem *cxlm, u32 reg)
>  {
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/mem.c b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> index 4109ef7c3ecb..9fd2d1daa534 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,56 @@
>  #include "pci.h"
>  #include "cxl.h"
>  
> +static int cxl_mem_mbox_get(struct cxl_mem *cxlm)
> +{
> +	u64 md_status;
> +	u32 ctrl;
> +	int rc = -EBUSY;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&cxlm->mbox_lock);
> +
> +	ctrl = cxl_read_mbox_reg32(cxlm, CXLDEV_MB_CTRL);
> +	if (ctrl & CXLDEV_MB_CTRL_DOORBELL)

Perhaps a comment on what this path means? I know from the spec, but
not super obvious from the code here.  If we do hit this path the device
will fail to come up and we won't have a clue why.

> +		goto out;
> +
> +	md_status = cxl_read_mem_reg64(cxlm, CXLMDEV_STATUS);
> +	if (md_status & CXLMDEV_MBOX_IF_READY && CXLMDEV_READY(md_status)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Hardware shouldn't allow a ready status but also have failure
> +		 * bits set. Spit out an error, this should be a bug report
> +		 */
> +		if (md_status & CXLMDEV_DEV_FATAL) {
> +			dev_err(&cxlm->pdev->dev,
> +				"CXL device reporting ready and fatal\n");
> +			rc = -EFAULT;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +		if (md_status & CXLMDEV_FW_HALT) {
> +			dev_err(&cxlm->pdev->dev,
> +				"CXL device reporting ready and halted\n");
> +			rc = -EFAULT;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +		if (CXLMDEV_RESET_NEEDED(md_status)) {
> +			dev_err(&cxlm->pdev->dev,
> +				"CXL device reporting ready and reset needed\n");
> +			rc = -EFAULT;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +out:
> +	spin_unlock(&cxlm->mbox_lock);
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +
> +static void cxl_mem_mbox_put(struct cxl_mem *cxlm)
> +{
> +	spin_unlock(&cxlm->mbox_lock);
> +}
> +
>  static int cxl_mem_setup_regs(struct cxl_mem *cxlm)
>  {
>  	u64 cap_array;
> @@ -88,6 +138,8 @@ static struct cxl_mem *cxl_mem_create(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 reg_lo, u32 reg_
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  	}
>  
> +	spin_lock_init(&cxlm->mbox_lock);
> +
>  	regs = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[bar];
>  	cxlm->pdev = pdev;
>  	cxlm->regs = regs + offset;
> @@ -160,6 +212,13 @@ static int cxl_mem_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>  	if (rc)
>  		return rc;
>  
> +	/* Check that hardware "looks" okay. */
> +	rc = cxl_mem_mbox_get(cxlm);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return rc;
> +
> +	cxl_mem_mbox_put(cxlm);
> +	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "CXL Memory Device Interface Up\n");
>  	pci_set_drvdata(pdev, cxlm);
>  
>  	return 0;


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-17 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-11  5:43 [RFC PATCH 0/9] CXL 2.0 Support Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:43 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] cxl/acpi: Add an acpi_cxl module for the CXL interconnect Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  6:17   ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-11  7:10   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-11  7:30     ` Verma, Vishal L
2020-11-11  7:34       ` hch
2020-11-11  7:36         ` Verma, Vishal L
2020-11-11 23:03   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-16 17:59   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 18:23     ` Verma, Vishal L
2020-11-17 14:32   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-11-17 21:45     ` Dan Williams
2020-11-18 11:14       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-11-11  5:43 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] cxl/acpi: add OSC support Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 17:59   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-16 23:25     ` Dan Williams
2020-11-18 12:25       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-11-18 17:58         ` Dan Williams
2020-11-11  5:43 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] cxl/mem: Add a driver for the type-3 mailbox Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  6:17   ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-11  7:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-11 17:17     ` Dan Williams
2020-11-11 18:27       ` Dan Williams
2020-11-11 21:41       ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-11 22:40         ` Dan Williams
2020-11-16 16:56       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-13 18:17   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-14  1:08     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-15  0:23       ` Dan Williams
2020-11-17 14:49   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-12-04  7:22     ` Dan Williams
2020-12-04  7:27       ` Dan Williams
2020-12-04 17:39         ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:43 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] cxl/mem: Map memory device registers Ben Widawsky
2020-11-13 18:17   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-14  1:12     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-16 23:19       ` Dan Williams
2020-11-17  0:23         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-23 19:20           ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-23 19:32             ` Dan Williams
2020-11-23 19:58               ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 15:00   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:43 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] cxl/mem: Find device capabilities Ben Widawsky
2020-11-13 18:26   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-14  1:36     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 15:15   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-24  0:17     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-26  6:05   ` Jon Masters
2020-11-26 18:18     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-12-04  7:35     ` Dan Williams
2020-12-04  7:41   ` Dan Williams
2020-12-07  6:12     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11  5:43 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] cxl/mem: Initialize the mailbox interface Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 15:22   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2020-11-11  5:43 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] cxl/mem: Implement polled mode mailbox Ben Widawsky
2020-11-13 23:14   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-17 15:31   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-17 16:34     ` Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 18:06       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-17 18:38         ` Dan Williams
2020-11-11  5:43 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] cxl/mem: Register CXL memX devices Ben Widawsky
2020-11-17 15:56   ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-20  2:16     ` Dan Williams
2020-11-20 15:20       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-11-11  5:43 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainers of the CXL driver Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11 22:06 ` [RFC PATCH 0/9] CXL 2.0 Support Ben Widawsky
2020-11-11 22:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201117152236.000017eb@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=sean.v.kelley@intel.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).