From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Robert Święcki" <robert@swiecki.net>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@amacapital.net>,
"Will Drewry" <wad@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] signal: HANDLER_EXIT should clear SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 18:53:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220210025321.787113-1-keescook@chromium.org> (raw)
Hi,
This fixes the signal refactoring to actually kill unkillable processes
when receiving a fatal SIGSYS from seccomp. Thanks to Robert for the
report and Eric for the fix! I've also tweaked seccomp internal a bit to
fail more safely. This was a partial seccomp bypass, in the sense that
SECCOMP_RET_KILL_* didn't kill the process, but it didn't bypass other
aspects of the filters. (i.e. the syscall was still blocked, etc.)
I'll be sending this to Linus after a bit more testing...
Thanks,
-Kees
Kees Cook (3):
signal: HANDLER_EXIT should clear SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE
seccomp: Invalidate seccomp mode to catch death failures
samples/seccomp: Adjust sample to also provide kill option
kernel/seccomp.c | 10 ++++++++++
kernel/signal.c | 5 +++--
samples/seccomp/dropper.c | 9 +++++++--
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2022-02-10 2:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-10 2:53 Kees Cook [this message]
2022-02-10 2:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] signal: HANDLER_EXIT should clear SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE Kees Cook
2022-02-10 16:18 ` Jann Horn
2022-02-10 17:37 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-10 18:01 ` Jann Horn
2022-02-10 18:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-10 21:09 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-11 20:15 ` Jann Horn
2022-02-10 18:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-10 2:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] seccomp: Invalidate seccomp mode to catch death failures Kees Cook
2022-02-10 2:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] samples/seccomp: Adjust sample to also provide kill option Kees Cook
2022-02-10 18:17 ` [PATCH 0/3] signal: HANDLER_EXIT should clear SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-10 18:41 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-10 18:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-10 20:43 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-10 22:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-11 1:26 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-11 1:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-11 2:53 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-11 12:54 ` Robert Święcki
2022-02-11 17:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-11 18:57 ` Robert Święcki
2022-02-11 20:01 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-11 19:58 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220210025321.787113-1-keescook@chromium.org \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=robert@swiecki.net \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).