Re: [PATCH 1/3] signal: HANDLER_EXIT should clear SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE

["Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>]

Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes:

> Fatal SIGSYS signals were not being delivered to pid namespace init
> processes . Make sure the SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE doesn't get set for these
           ^ when ptraced.
> cases.



Reviewed-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

I have pointed out a few nits in the wording but otherwise this looks good.
>
> Reported-by: Robert Święcki <robert@swiecki.net>
> Suggested-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> Fixes: 00b06da29cf9 ("signal: Add SA_IMMUTABLE to ensure forced siganls do not get changed")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
>  kernel/signal.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
> index 38602738866e..33e3ee4f3383 100644
> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -1342,9 +1342,10 @@ force_sig_info_to_task(struct kernel_siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t,
>  	}
>  	/*
>  	 * Don't clear SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE for traced tasks, users won't expect
> -	 * debugging to leave init killable.
> +	 * debugging to leave init killable, unless it is intended to exit.
perhaps                                     ^ HANDLER_EXIT is always fatal.
>  	 */
> -	if (action->sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL && !t->ptrace)
> +	if (action->sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL &&
> +	    (!t->ptrace || (handler == HANDLER_EXIT)))
>  		t->signal->flags &= ~SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE;
>  	ret = send_signal(sig, info, t, PIDTYPE_PID);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&t->sighand->siglock, flags);

Eric