linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
To: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
	jpoimboe@redhat.com, joe.lawrence@redhat.com, pmladek@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] livepatch/shadow: Add garbage collection of shadow variables
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 18:03:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221104010327.wa256pos75dczt4x@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221026194122.11761-5-mpdesouza@suse.com>

On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 04:41:22PM -0300, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> The life of shadow variables is not completely trivial to maintain.
> They might be used by more livepatches and more livepatched objects.
> They should stay as long as there is any user.
> 
> In practice, it requires to implement reference counting in callbacks
> of all users. They should register all the user and remove the shadow
> variables only when there is no user left.
> 
> This patch hides the reference counting into the klp_shadow API.
> The counter is connected with the shadow variable @id. It requires
> an API to take and release the reference. The release function also
> calls the related dtor() when defined.
> 
> An easy solution would be to add some get_ref()/put_ref() API.
> But it would need to get called from pre()/post_un() callbacks.
> It might be easy to forget a callback and make it wrong.
> 
> A more safe approach is to associate the klp_shadow_type with
> klp_objects that use the shadow variables. The livepatch core
> code might then handle the reference counters on background.
> 
> The shadow variable type might then be added into a new @shadow_types
> member of struct klp_object. They will get then automatically registered
> and unregistered when the object is being livepatched. The registration
> increments the reference count. Unregistration decreases the reference
> count. All shadow variables of the given type are freed when the reference
> count reaches zero.
> 
> All klp_shadow_alloc/get/free functions also checks whether the requested
> type is registered. It will help to catch missing registration and might
> also help to catch eventual races.

Is there a reason the shadow variable lifetime is tied to klp_object
rather than klp_patch?

I get the feeling the latter would be easier to implement (no reference
counting; also maybe can be auto-detected with THIS_MODULE?) and harder
for the patch author to mess up (by accidentally omitting an object
which uses it).

-- 
Josh

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-04  1:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-26 19:41 [PATCH v2 0/4] livepatch: Add garbage collection for shadow variables Marcos Paulo de Souza
2022-10-26 19:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] livepatch/shadow: Separate code to get or use pre-allocated shadow variable Marcos Paulo de Souza
2022-10-31 15:44   ` Petr Mladek
2022-10-26 19:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] livepatch/shadow: Separate code removing all shadow variables for a given id Marcos Paulo de Souza
2022-10-26 19:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] livepatch/shadow: Introduce klp_shadow_type structure Marcos Paulo de Souza
2022-10-31 16:02   ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-31  4:36   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-10-26 19:41 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] livepatch/shadow: Add garbage collection of shadow variables Marcos Paulo de Souza
2022-11-04  1:03   ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2022-11-04 10:25     ` Petr Mladek
2022-11-08  1:32       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-11-08  9:14         ` Petr Mladek
2022-11-08 18:44           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-11-09 14:36             ` Petr Mladek
2023-02-04 23:59               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-02-17 16:22                 ` Petr Mladek
2022-11-11  9:20       ` Nicolai Stange
2022-11-11  9:55         ` Petr Mladek
2022-11-13 18:51           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-17 15:01             ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-25 23:22               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-26  9:36                 ` Petr Mladek
2023-02-04 19:34                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-31  4:40   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-31 14:23     ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-31 21:17       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-02-02 13:58         ` Petr Mladek
2023-02-01  0:18   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-02-02 10:14     ` Petr Mladek
2023-02-04 17:37       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-11-01 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] livepatch: Add garbage collection for " Petr Mladek
2023-01-23 17:33   ` Marcos Paulo de Souza
2023-01-24 15:51     ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-26 16:35       ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-26 17:05         ` Joe Lawrence
2023-01-26 18:30           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-27 10:51             ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-27 11:08           ` Marcos Paulo de Souza

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221104010327.wa256pos75dczt4x@treble \
    --to=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpdesouza@suse.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).