From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, luto@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
willy@infradead.org, mgorman@suse.de, tglx@linutronix.de,
jon.grimm@amd.com, bharata@amd.com, raghavendra.kt@amd.com,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] sched: define TIF_ALLOW_RESCHED
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 18:20:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230911182012.7f1f35c1@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=whpYjm_AizQij6XEfTd7xvGjrVCx5gzHcHm=2Xijt+Kyg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 13:50:53 -0700
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> And it seems like it's actually server people who want the "no
> preemption" (and presumably avoid all the preempt count stuff entirely
> - it's not necessarily the *preemption* that is the cost, it's the
> incessant preempt count updates)
I'm sure there's some overhead with the preemption itself. With the
meltdown/spectre mitigations going into and out of the kernel does add some
more overhead. And finishing a system call before being preempted may give
some performance benefits for some micro benchmark out there.
Going out on a crazy idea, I wonder if we could get the compiler to help us
here. As all preempt disabled locations are static, and as for functions,
they can be called with preemption enabled or disabled. Would it be
possible for the compiler to mark all locations that need preemption disabled?
If a function is called in a preempt disabled section and also called in a
preempt enable section, it could make two versions of the function (one
where preemption is disabled and one where it is enabled).
Then all we would need is a look up table to know if preemption is safe or
not by looking at the instruction pointer.
Yes, I know this is kind of a wild idea, but I do believe it is possible.
The compiler wouldn't need to know of the concept of "preemption" just a
"make this location special, and keep functions called by that location
special and duplicate them if they are are called outside of this special
section".
;-)
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-11 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 152+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-30 18:49 [PATCH v2 0/9] x86/clear_huge_page: multi-page clearing Ankur Arora
2023-08-30 18:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] mm/clear_huge_page: allow arch override for clear_huge_page() Ankur Arora
2023-08-30 18:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] mm/huge_page: separate clear_huge_page() and copy_huge_page() Ankur Arora
2023-08-30 18:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] mm/huge_page: cleanup clear_/copy_subpage() Ankur Arora
2023-09-08 13:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-11 17:22 ` Ankur Arora
2023-08-30 18:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] x86/clear_page: extend clear_page*() for multi-page clearing Ankur Arora
2023-09-08 13:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-30 18:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] x86/clear_page: add clear_pages() Ankur Arora
2023-08-30 18:49 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] x86/clear_huge_page: multi-page clearing Ankur Arora
2023-08-31 18:26 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-08 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-13 6:43 ` Raghavendra K T
2023-08-30 18:49 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] sched: define TIF_ALLOW_RESCHED Ankur Arora
2023-09-08 7:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-08 17:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-08 22:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-09 5:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-09 6:39 ` Ankur Arora
2023-09-09 9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-09 20:04 ` Ankur Arora
2023-09-09 5:30 ` Ankur Arora
2023-09-09 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-09 20:15 ` Ankur Arora
2023-09-09 21:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-10 3:48 ` Ankur Arora
2023-09-10 4:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-10 10:01 ` Ankur Arora
2023-09-10 18:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-11 15:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-11 16:29 ` andrew.cooper3
2023-09-11 17:04 ` Ankur Arora
2023-09-12 8:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-12 12:24 ` Phil Auld
2023-09-12 12:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-18 23:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-19 1:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-19 8:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-09-19 8:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-09-19 13:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-19 13:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-19 12:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-19 13:00 ` Arches that don't support PREEMPT Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-19 13:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-09-19 13:37 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-09-19 13:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-19 13:48 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-09-19 14:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-19 14:24 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-09-19 14:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-19 15:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-09-20 14:38 ` Anton Ivanov
2023-09-21 12:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-09-19 14:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-19 14:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2023-09-19 14:57 ` Matt Turner
2023-09-19 17:09 ` Ulrich Teichert
2023-09-19 17:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-19 17:58 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-09-19 18:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-19 18:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-09-19 18:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-19 19:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-20 7:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-09-20 7:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-09-20 8:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-20 10:37 ` David Laight
2023-09-19 14:21 ` Anton Ivanov
2023-09-19 15:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-19 15:21 ` Anton Ivanov
2023-09-19 16:22 ` Richard Weinberger
2023-09-19 16:41 ` Anton Ivanov
2023-09-19 17:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-06 14:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-09-20 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] sched: define TIF_ALLOW_RESCHED Ankur Arora
2023-09-20 20:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-21 0:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-21 0:58 ` Ankur Arora
2023-09-21 2:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-20 23:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-21 0:57 ` Ankur Arora
2023-09-21 2:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-21 4:16 ` Ankur Arora
2023-09-21 13:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-09-21 16:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-21 22:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-23 1:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-02 14:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-10-02 16:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-18 1:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-10-18 12:09 ` Ankur Arora
2023-10-18 17:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-10-18 22:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-18 23:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-10-18 13:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-18 14:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-10-18 17:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-10-18 18:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-10-18 18:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-10-19 12:37 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2023-10-19 17:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-10-18 17:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-10-18 17:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-10-18 17:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-10-18 20:15 ` Ankur Arora
2023-10-18 20:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-10-19 0:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-19 19:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-10-20 21:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-10-20 22:56 ` Ankur Arora
2023-10-20 23:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-10-21 1:05 ` Ankur Arora
2023-10-21 2:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-10-24 12:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 18:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-09-23 22:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-24 0:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-24 7:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-24 7:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-24 10:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-25 0:13 ` Ankur Arora
2023-10-06 13:01 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-09-19 7:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-09-19 19:05 ` Ankur Arora
2023-10-24 14:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-10-25 1:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-10-26 7:50 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2023-10-26 12:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-09-11 16:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-09-11 20:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-11 21:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-12 7:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-12 7:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-09-11 22:20 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2023-09-11 23:10 ` Ankur Arora
2023-09-11 23:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-09-12 16:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-12 3:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-12 16:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-19 3:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2023-09-19 9:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-19 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2023-08-30 18:49 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] irqentry: define irqentry_exit_allow_resched() Ankur Arora
2023-09-08 12:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-11 17:24 ` Ankur Arora
2023-08-30 18:49 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] x86/clear_huge_page: make clear_contig_region() preemptible Ankur Arora
2023-09-08 12:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-03 8:14 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] x86/clear_huge_page: multi-page clearing Mateusz Guzik
2023-09-05 22:14 ` Ankur Arora
2023-09-08 2:18 ` Raghavendra K T
2023-09-05 1:06 ` Raghavendra K T
2023-09-05 19:36 ` Ankur Arora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230911182012.7f1f35c1@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--cc=bharata@amd.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jon.grimm@amd.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raghavendra.kt@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).