linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,pbonzini@redhat.com,tglx@linutronix.de,x86@kernel.org,bp@alien8.de,Dave
	Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 32/34] x86/cpu/amd: Move memory encryption detection
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:40:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240222184008.9A33B01E@davehans-spike.ostc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240222183926.517AFCD2@davehans-spike.ostc.intel.com>


From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

Right now the AMD memory encryption detection code is run on every CPU
despite it operating on 'bsp_addr_config' and doing setup_clear_cpu_cap()
which only affects 'boot_cpu_data'.

Move it to bsp_init_amd() where it belongs and change its name to match.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
---

 b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c |  110 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c~early_init_amd-__init arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c~early_init_amd-__init	2024-02-22 10:09:04.201071279 -0800
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c	2024-02-22 10:09:04.201071279 -0800
@@ -468,8 +468,62 @@ static void early_init_amd_mc(struct cpu
 #endif
 }
 
-static void bsp_init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+static void bsp_detect_mem_encrypt(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
+	u64 msr;
+
+	/*
+	 * BIOS support is required for SME and SEV.
+	 *   For SME: If BIOS has enabled SME then adjust x86_phys_bits by
+	 *	      the SME physical address space reduction value.
+	 *	      If BIOS has not enabled SME then don't advertise the
+	 *	      SME feature (set in scattered.c).
+	 *	      If the kernel has not enabled SME via any means then
+	 *	      don't advertise the SME feature.
+	 *   For SEV: If BIOS has not enabled SEV then don't advertise the
+	 *            SEV and SEV_ES feature (set in scattered.c).
+	 *
+	 *   In all cases, since support for SME and SEV requires long mode,
+	 *   don't advertise the feature under CONFIG_X86_32.
+	 */
+	if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_SME) || cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_SEV)) {
+		/* Check if memory encryption is enabled */
+		rdmsrl(MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG, msr);
+		if (!(msr & MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_MEM_ENCRYPT))
+			goto clear_all;
+
+		/*
+		 * Always adjust physical address bits. Even though this
+		 * will be a value above 32-bits this is still done for
+		 * CONFIG_X86_32 so that accurate values are reported.
+		 */
+		bsp_addr_config.phys_addr_reduction_bits =
+			(cpuid_ebx(0x8000001f) >> 6) & 0x3f;
+
+		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32))
+			goto clear_all;
+
+		if (!sme_me_mask)
+			setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SME);
+
+		rdmsrl(MSR_K7_HWCR, msr);
+		if (!(msr & MSR_K7_HWCR_SMMLOCK))
+			goto clear_sev;
+
+		return;
+
+clear_all:
+		setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SME);
+clear_sev:
+		setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SEV);
+		setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SEV_ES);
+	}
+}
+
+static void __init bsp_init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+{
+	bsp_detect_mem_encrypt(c);
+
 	if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC)) {
 
 		if (c->x86 > 0x10 ||
@@ -593,58 +647,6 @@ warn:
 	WARN_ONCE(1, "Family 0x%x, model: 0x%x??\n", c->x86, c->x86_model);
 }
 
-static void early_detect_mem_encrypt(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
-{
-	u64 msr;
-
-	/*
-	 * BIOS support is required for SME and SEV.
-	 *   For SME: If BIOS has enabled SME then adjust x86_phys_bits by
-	 *	      the SME physical address space reduction value.
-	 *	      If BIOS has not enabled SME then don't advertise the
-	 *	      SME feature (set in scattered.c).
-	 *	      If the kernel has not enabled SME via any means then
-	 *	      don't advertise the SME feature.
-	 *   For SEV: If BIOS has not enabled SEV then don't advertise the
-	 *            SEV and SEV_ES feature (set in scattered.c).
-	 *
-	 *   In all cases, since support for SME and SEV requires long mode,
-	 *   don't advertise the feature under CONFIG_X86_32.
-	 */
-	if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_SME) || cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_SEV)) {
-		/* Check if memory encryption is enabled */
-		rdmsrl(MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG, msr);
-		if (!(msr & MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_MEM_ENCRYPT))
-			goto clear_all;
-
-		/*
-		 * Always adjust physical address bits. Even though this
-		 * will be a value above 32-bits this is still done for
-		 * CONFIG_X86_32 so that accurate values are reported.
-		 */
-		bsp_addr_config.phys_addr_reduction_bits =
-			(cpuid_ebx(0x8000001f) >> 6) & 0x3f;
-
-		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32))
-			goto clear_all;
-
-		if (!sme_me_mask)
-			setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SME);
-
-		rdmsrl(MSR_K7_HWCR, msr);
-		if (!(msr & MSR_K7_HWCR_SMMLOCK))
-			goto clear_sev;
-
-		return;
-
-clear_all:
-		setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SME);
-clear_sev:
-		setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SEV);
-		setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SEV_ES);
-	}
-}
-
 static void early_init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
 	u64 value;
@@ -715,8 +717,6 @@ static void early_init_amd(struct cpuinf
 	if (c->x86 == 0x16 && c->x86_model <= 0xf)
 		msr_set_bit(MSR_AMD64_LS_CFG, 15);
 
-	early_detect_mem_encrypt(c);
-
 	/* Re-enable TopologyExtensions if switched off by BIOS */
 	if (c->x86 == 0x15 &&
 	    (c->x86_model >= 0x10 && c->x86_model <= 0x6f) &&
_

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-22 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-22 18:39 [RFC][PATCH 00/34] [RFC] x86: Rework system-wide configuration masquerading as per-cpu data Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/34] x86/xen: Explain why calling get_cpu_cap() so early is a hack Dave Hansen
2024-03-07 16:27   ` Borislav Petkov
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/34] x86/xen: Remove early "debug" physical address lookups Dave Hansen
2024-03-07 17:01   ` Borislav Petkov
2024-03-11 13:16   ` Jürgen Groß
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/34] x86/pci: Assume that clflush size is always provided Dave Hansen
2024-03-08  8:57   ` Borislav Petkov
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/34] x86/mm: Introduce physical address limit helper Dave Hansen
2024-02-27 11:05   ` Huang, Kai
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/34] x86/cpu: Move /proc per-cpu ->x86_phys_bits reference to global one Dave Hansen
2024-02-27 11:05   ` Huang, Kai
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/34] x86/boot: Use consistent value for iomem_resource.end Dave Hansen
2024-02-27 10:59   ` Huang, Kai
2024-02-28 14:22     ` Zhang, Rui
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/34] x86/mm: Introduce virtual address space limit helper Dave Hansen
2024-02-27 11:09   ` Huang, Kai
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/34] x86/cpu: Add CLFLUSH size helper Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/34] x86/cpu: Introduce address configuration structure Dave Hansen
2024-02-27 23:47   ` Huang, Kai
2024-02-28 17:29     ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/34] x86/cpu/amd: Use new "address configuration" infrastructure Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/34] x86/cpu/intel: Prepare MKTME for " Dave Hansen
2024-02-23 11:33   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-02-23 16:22     ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-26 12:14       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-02-27 21:48         ` Huang, Kai
2024-02-28 15:20           ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-02-28 16:57             ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/34] x86/cpu/intel: Actually use "address configuration" infrastructure for MKTME Dave Hansen
2024-02-23 11:41   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-02-23 16:16     ` Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/34] x86/boot: Use address reduction config to handle erratum Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 14/34] x86/cpu: Remove default physical address space settings Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 15/34] x86/cpu: Remove default x86_phys_bits assignment Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 16/34] x86/cpu: Move physical address limit out of cpuinfo_x86 Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 17/34] x86/cpu: Move virtual " Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 18/34] x86/cpu/centaur: Move cache alignment override to BSP init Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 19/34] x86/cpu: Introduce cache alignment multiplier Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 20/34] x86/cpu: Remove superfluous cache alignment assignments Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 21/34] x86/cpu: Consolidate CLFLUSH size setting Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 22/34] x86/cpu: Move CLFLUSH size into global config Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 23/34] x86/cpu: Move cache alignment configuration to global struct Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 24/34] x86/cpu: Establish 'min_cache_bits' configuration Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 25/34] x86/cpu: Move cache bits to global config Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 26/34] x86/cpu: Zap superfluous get_cpu_address_sizes() Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 27/34] x86/cpu: Enforce read-only x86_config state (lightly) Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 28/34] x86/cpu: Return sane defaults for early x86_config reads Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 29/34] x86/xen: Remove extra get_cpu_address_sizes() call Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 30/34] x86/cpu/centaur: Mark BSP init function as __init Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 31/34] x86/cpu/intel: " Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:40 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2024-02-22 18:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 33/34] x86/cpu: Make get_cpu_address_sizes() static and __init Dave Hansen
2024-02-22 18:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 34/34] x86/cpu: Mark new boot CPU and config structures appropriately Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240222184008.9A33B01E@davehans-spike.ostc.intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).