From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/15] sched/core: uclamp: Add CPU's clamp buckets refcounting
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 13:52:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21171fa0-7fd5-ebbf-dd48-d6668ed563af@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190208100554.32196-2-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
On 2/8/19 11:05 AM, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
[...]
> +config UCLAMP_BUCKETS_COUNT
> + int "Number of supported utilization clamp buckets"
> + range 5 20
> + default 5
> + depends on UCLAMP_TASK
> + help
> + Defines the number of clamp buckets to use. The range of each bucket
> + will be SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE/UCLAMP_BUCKETS_COUNT. The higher the
> + number of clamp buckets the finer their granularity and the higher
> + the precision of clamping aggregation and tracking at run-time.
> +
> + For example, with the default configuration we will have 5 clamp
> + buckets tracking 20% utilization each. A 25% boosted tasks will be
> + refcounted in the [20..39]% bucket and will set the bucket clamp
> + effective value to 25%.
> + If a second 30% boosted task should be co-scheduled on the same CPU,
> + that task will be refcounted in the same bucket of the first task and
> + it will boost the bucket clamp effective value to 30%.
> + The clamp effective value of a bucket is reset to its nominal value
> + (20% in the example above) when there are anymore tasks refcounted in
this sounds weird.
[...]
> +static inline unsigned int uclamp_bucket_value(unsigned int clamp_value)
> +{
> + return UCLAMP_BUCKET_DELTA * uclamp_bucket_id(clamp_value);
> +}
Soemthing like uclamp_bucket_nominal_value() should be clearer.
> +static inline void uclamp_rq_update(struct rq *rq, unsigned int clamp_id)
> +{
> + struct uclamp_bucket *bucket = rq->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket;
> + unsigned int max_value = uclamp_none(clamp_id);
> + unsigned int bucket_id;
unsigned int bucket_id = UCLAMP_BUCKETS;
> +
> + /*
> + * Both min and max clamps are MAX aggregated, thus the topmost
> + * bucket with some tasks defines the rq's clamp value.
> + */
> + bucket_id = UCLAMP_BUCKETS;
to get rid of this line?
> + do {
> + --bucket_id;
> + if (!rq->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket[bucket_id].tasks)
if (!bucket[bucket_id].tasks)
[...]
> +/*
> + * When a task is enqueued on a rq, the clamp bucket currently defined by the
> + * task's uclamp::bucket_id is reference counted on that rq. This also
> + * immediately updates the rq's clamp value if required.
> + *
> + * Since tasks know their specific value requested from user-space, we track
> + * within each bucket the maximum value for tasks refcounted in that bucket.
> + * This provide a further aggregation (local clamping) which allows to track
s/This provide/This provides
> + * within each bucket the exact "requested" clamp value whenever all tasks
> + * RUNNABLE in that bucket require the same clamp.
> + */
> +static inline void uclamp_rq_inc_id(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq,
> + unsigned int clamp_id)
> +{
> + unsigned int bucket_id = p->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket_id;
> + unsigned int rq_clamp, bkt_clamp, tsk_clamp;
Wouldn't it be easier to have a pointer to the task's and rq's uclamp
structure as well to the bucket?
- unsigned int bucket_id = p->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket_id;
+ struct uclamp_se *uc_se = &p->uclamp[clamp_id];
+ struct uclamp_rq *uc_rq = &rq->uclamp[clamp_id];
+ struct uclamp_bucket *bucket = &uc_rq->bucket[uc_se->bucket_id];
The code in uclamp_rq_inc_id() and uclamp_rq_dec_id() for example
becomes much more readable.
[...]
> struct sched_class {
> const struct sched_class *next;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK
> + int uclamp_enabled;
> +#endif
> +
> void (*enqueue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags);
> void (*dequeue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags);
> - void (*yield_task) (struct rq *rq);
> - bool (*yield_to_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool preempt);
>
> void (*check_preempt_curr)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags);
>
> @@ -1685,7 +1734,6 @@ struct sched_class {
> void (*set_curr_task)(struct rq *rq);
> void (*task_tick)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int queued);
> void (*task_fork)(struct task_struct *p);
> - void (*task_dead)(struct task_struct *p);
>
> /*
> * The switched_from() call is allowed to drop rq->lock, therefore we
> @@ -1702,12 +1750,17 @@ struct sched_class {
>
> void (*update_curr)(struct rq *rq);
>
> + void (*yield_task) (struct rq *rq);
> + bool (*yield_to_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool preempt);
> +
> #define TASK_SET_GROUP 0
> #define TASK_MOVE_GROUP 1
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> void (*task_change_group)(struct task_struct *p, int type);
> #endif
> +
> + void (*task_dead)(struct task_struct *p);
Why do you move yield_task, yield_to_task and task_dead here?
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-12 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-08 10:05 [PATCH v7 00/15] Add utilization clamping support Patrick Bellasi
2019-02-08 10:05 ` [PATCH v7 01/15] sched/core: uclamp: Add CPU's clamp buckets refcounting Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-12 12:52 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2019-03-13 15:15 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-13 21:01 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-03-14 14:54 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-14 15:00 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-12 15:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-12 15:50 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-13 8:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-13 11:37 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-13 13:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-13 16:12 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-13 17:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-13 18:22 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-13 19:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-14 12:13 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-14 13:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-14 15:07 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-14 19:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-13 13:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-13 15:59 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-13 19:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-14 11:03 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-14 13:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-13 19:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-14 11:18 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-13 21:23 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-03-14 12:43 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-13 14:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-13 15:28 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-13 14:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-13 15:23 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-13 19:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-13 21:08 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-03-14 12:22 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-14 11:45 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-13 21:32 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-03-14 14:46 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-14 15:29 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-03-14 15:40 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-14 16:39 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-02-08 10:05 ` [PATCH v7 02/15] sched/core: uclamp: Enforce last task UCLAMP_MAX Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-13 14:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-13 16:20 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-13 17:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-13 18:29 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-13 14:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-13 16:16 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-14 0:29 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-03-14 17:06 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-02-08 10:05 ` [PATCH v7 03/15] sched/core: uclamp: Add system default clamps Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-13 14:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-13 17:09 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-13 19:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-13 20:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-15 13:41 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-13 20:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-13 20:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-18 12:18 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-18 13:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-18 14:21 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-18 14:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-08 10:05 ` [PATCH v7 04/15] sched/core: Allow sched_setattr() to use the current policy Patrick Bellasi
2019-02-08 10:05 ` [PATCH v7 05/15] sched/core: uclamp: Extend sched_setattr() to support utilization clamping Patrick Bellasi
2019-02-08 10:05 ` [PATCH v7 06/15] sched/core: uclamp: Reset uclamp values on RESET_ON_FORK Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-13 20:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-18 12:58 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-02-08 10:05 ` [PATCH v7 07/15] sched/core: uclamp: Set default clamps for RT tasks Patrick Bellasi
2019-02-08 10:05 ` [PATCH v7 08/15] sched/cpufreq: uclamp: Add clamps for FAIR and " Patrick Bellasi
2019-02-08 10:05 ` [PATCH v7 09/15] sched/core: uclamp: Add uclamp_util_with() Patrick Bellasi
2019-02-08 10:05 ` [PATCH v7 10/15] sched/fair: uclamp: Add uclamp support to energy_compute() Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-06 17:21 ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-18 15:19 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-02-08 10:05 ` [PATCH v7 11/15] sched/core: uclamp: Extend CPU's cgroup controller Patrick Bellasi
2019-02-14 15:48 ` Tejun Heo
2019-03-19 10:00 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-02-08 10:05 ` [PATCH v7 12/15] sched/core: uclamp: Propagate parent clamps Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-14 16:17 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-03-18 16:54 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-03-18 16:58 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-02-08 10:05 ` [PATCH v7 13/15] sched/core: uclamp: Propagate system defaults to root group Patrick Bellasi
2019-02-08 10:05 ` [PATCH v7 14/15] sched/core: uclamp: Use TG's clamps to restrict TASK's clamps Patrick Bellasi
2019-02-08 10:05 ` [PATCH v7 15/15] sched/core: uclamp: Update CPU's refcount on TG's clamp changes Patrick Bellasi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21171fa0-7fd5-ebbf-dd48-d6668ed563af@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=quentin.perret@arm.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=smuckle@google.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).