linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Koen Vandeputte <koen.vandeputte@ncentric.com>
To: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	"Krzysztof Hałasa" <khalasa@piap.pl>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] 802.11n IBSS: wlan0 stops receiving packets due to aggregation after sender reboot
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:41:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <30465e05-3465-f496-d57f-5e115551f5cb@ncentric.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5b07b4ce51f806ce79b1ae06ff3cbabbaa4873d.camel@sipsolutions.net>


On 28.10.19 13:21, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 12:21 +0200, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
>> Fix a bug where the mac80211 RX aggregation code sets a new aggregation
>> "session" at the remote station's request, but the head_seq_num
>> (the sequence number the receiver expects to receive) isn't reset.
>>
>> Spotted on a pair of AR9580 in IBSS mode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Halasa <khalasa@piap.pl>
>>
>> diff --git a/net/mac80211/agg-rx.c b/net/mac80211/agg-rx.c
>> index 4d1c335e06e5..67733bd61297 100644
>> --- a/net/mac80211/agg-rx.c
>> +++ b/net/mac80211/agg-rx.c
>> @@ -354,10 +354,13 @@ void ___ieee80211_start_rx_ba_session(struct sta_info *sta,
>>   			 */
>>   			rcu_read_lock();
>>   			tid_rx = rcu_dereference(sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_rx[tid]);
>> -			if (tid_rx && tid_rx->timeout == timeout)
>> +			if (tid_rx && tid_rx->timeout == timeout) {
>> +				tid_rx->ssn = start_seq_num;
>> +				tid_rx->head_seq_num = start_seq_num;
>>   				status = WLAN_STATUS_SUCCESS;
> This is wrong, this is the case of *updating an existing session*, we
> must not reset the head SN then.
>
> I think you just got very lucky (or unlucky) to have the same dialog
> token, because we start from 0 - maybe we should initialize it to a
> random value to flush out such issues.
>
> Really what I think probably happened is that one of your stations lost
> the connection to the other, and didn't tell it about it in any way - so
> the other kept all the status alive.
>
> I suspect to make all this work well we need to not only have the fixes
> I made recently to actually send and parse deauth frames, but also to
> even send an auth and reset the state when we receive that, so if we
> move out of range and even the deauth frame is lost, we can still reset
> properly.
>
> In any case, this is not the right approach - we need to handle the
> "lost connection" case better I suspect, but since you don't say what
> really happened I don't really know that that's what you're seeing.
>
> johannes

Hi all,

I can confirm the issue as I'm also seeing this sometimes in the field here.

Sometimes when a devices goes out of range and then re-enters,
the link refuses to "come up", as in rx looks to be "stuck" without any 
reports in system log or locking issues (lockdep enabled)

I have dozens of devices installed offshore (802.11n based), both on 
static and moving assets,
which cover from short (250m) up to very long distances (~35km)

So .. while there is some momentum for this issue,
I'm more than happy to provide extensive testing should fixes be posted 
regarding IBSS in general.

Regards,

Koen


  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-29  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-21 12:11 802.11n IBSS: wlan0 stops receiving packets due to aggregation after sender reboot Krzysztof Hałasa
2019-10-21 12:18 ` [PATCH] " Krzysztof Hałasa
2019-10-22  9:42   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2019-10-21 12:18 ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2019-10-25 10:21 ` [PATCH v2] " Krzysztof Hałasa
2019-10-28 12:21   ` Johannes Berg
2019-10-29  8:41     ` Koen Vandeputte [this message]
2019-10-29  8:58       ` Sebastian Gottschall
2019-10-29  9:40         ` Koen Vandeputte
2019-10-29  9:03       ` Johannes Berg
2019-10-29  9:47         ` Koen Vandeputte
2019-10-29  8:54     ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2019-10-29  9:07       ` Johannes Berg
2019-10-29 10:51         ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2019-10-29 10:57           ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=30465e05-3465-f496-d57f-5e115551f5cb@ncentric.com \
    --to=koen.vandeputte@ncentric.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=khalasa@piap.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).