From: skannan@codeaurora.org
To: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mingo@redhat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
chris.redpath@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@arm.com,
valentin.schneider@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
thara.gopinath@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
tkjos@google.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, smuckle@google.com,
adharmap@quicinc.com, skannan@quicinc.com,
pkondeti@codeaurora.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
edubezval@gmail.com, srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com,
currojerez@riseup.net, javi.merino@kernel.org,
linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/14] sched/cpufreq: Refactor the utilization aggregation method
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 12:35:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <331552975e858911db66bc78c2c8e720@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180724122521.22109-11-quentin.perret@arm.com>
On 2018-07-24 05:25, Quentin Perret wrote:
> Schedutil aggregates the PELT signals of CFS, RT, DL and IRQ in order
> to decide which frequency to request. Energy Aware Scheduling (EAS)
> needs to be able to predict those requests to assess the energy impact
> of scheduling decisions. However, the PELT signals aggregation is only
> done in schedutil for now, hence making it hard to synchronize it with
> EAS.
>
> To address this issue, introduce schedutil_freq_util() to perform the
> aforementioned aggregation and make it available to other parts of the
> scheduler. Since frequency selection and energy estimation still need
> to deal with RT and DL signals slightly differently,
> schedutil_freq_util()
> is called with a different 'type' parameter in those two contexts, and
> returns an aggregated utilization signal accordingly.
>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 14 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> index 810193c8e4cd..af86050edcf5 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -198,15 +198,15 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct
> sugov_policy *sg_policy,
> * based on the task model parameters and gives the minimal
> utilization
> * required to meet deadlines.
> */
> -static unsigned long sugov_get_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
> +unsigned long schedutil_freq_util(int cpu, unsigned long util_cfs,
> + enum schedutil_type type)
> {
> - struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu);
> + struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> unsigned long util, irq, max;
>
> - sg_cpu->max = max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, sg_cpu->cpu);
> - sg_cpu->bw_dl = cpu_bw_dl(rq);
> + max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu);
>
> - if (rt_rq_is_runnable(&rq->rt))
> + if (type == frequency_util && rt_rq_is_runnable(&rq->rt))
> return max;
>
> /*
> @@ -224,20 +224,33 @@ static unsigned long sugov_get_util(struct
> sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
> * utilization (PELT windows are synchronized) we can directly add
> them
> * to obtain the CPU's actual utilization.
> */
> - util = cpu_util_cfs(rq);
> + util = util_cfs;
> util += cpu_util_rt(rq);
>
> - /*
> - * We do not make cpu_util_dl() a permanent part of this sum because
> we
> - * want to use cpu_bw_dl() later on, but we need to check if the
> - * CFS+RT+DL sum is saturated (ie. no idle time) such that we select
> - * f_max when there is no idle time.
> - *
> - * NOTE: numerical errors or stop class might cause us to not quite
> hit
> - * saturation when we should -- something for later.
> - */
> - if ((util + cpu_util_dl(rq)) >= max)
> - return max;
> + if (type == frequency_util) {
> + /*
> + * For frequency selection we do not make cpu_util_dl() a
> + * permanent part of this sum because we want to use
> + * cpu_bw_dl() later on, but we need to check if the
> + * CFS+RT+DL sum is saturated (ie. no idle time) such
> + * that we select f_max when there is no idle time.
> + *
> + * NOTE: numerical errors or stop class might cause us
> + * to not quite hit saturation when we should --
> + * something for later.
> + */
> +
> + if ((util + cpu_util_dl(rq)) >= max)
> + return max;
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * OTOH, for energy computation we need the estimated
> + * running time, so include util_dl and ignore dl_bw.
> + */
> + util += cpu_util_dl(rq);
> + if (util >= max)
> + return max;
> + }
If it's going to be a different aggregation from what's done for
frequency guidance, I don't see the point of having this inside
schedutil. Why not keep it inside the scheduler files? Also, it seems
weird to use a governor's code when it might not actually be in use.
What if someone is using ondemand, conservative, performance, etc?
>
> /*
> * There is still idle time; further improve the number by using the
> @@ -252,17 +265,34 @@ static unsigned long sugov_get_util(struct
> sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
> util /= max;
> util += irq;
>
> - /*
> - * Bandwidth required by DEADLINE must always be granted while, for
> - * FAIR and RT, we use blocked utilization of IDLE CPUs as a
> mechanism
> - * to gracefully reduce the frequency when no tasks show up for
> longer
> - * periods of time.
> - *
> - * Ideally we would like to set bw_dl as min/guaranteed freq and util
> +
> - * bw_dl as requested freq. However, cpufreq is not yet ready for
> such
> - * an interface. So, we only do the latter for now.
> - */
> - return min(max, util + sg_cpu->bw_dl);
> + if (type == frequency_util) {
> + /*
> + * Bandwidth required by DEADLINE must always be granted
> + * while, for FAIR and RT, we use blocked utilization of
> + * IDLE CPUs as a mechanism to gracefully reduce the
> + * frequency when no tasks show up for longer periods of
> + * time.
> + *
> + * Ideally we would like to set bw_dl as min/guaranteed
> + * freq and util + bw_dl as requested freq. However,
> + * cpufreq is not yet ready for such an interface. So,
> + * we only do the latter for now.
> + */
> + util += cpu_bw_dl(rq);
> + }
Instead of all this indentation, can't you just return early without
doing the code inside the if?
> +
> + return min(max, util);
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long sugov_get_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
> +{
> + struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu);
> + unsigned long util = cpu_util_cfs(rq);
> +
> + sg_cpu->max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, sg_cpu->cpu);
> + sg_cpu->bw_dl = cpu_bw_dl(rq);
> +
> + return schedutil_freq_util(sg_cpu->cpu, util, frequency_util);
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index 6d08ccd1e7a4..51e7f113ee23 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -2185,7 +2185,15 @@ static inline void cpufreq_update_util(struct
> rq *rq, unsigned int flags) {}
> # define arch_scale_freq_invariant() false
> #endif
>
> +enum schedutil_type {
> + frequency_util,
> + energy_util,
> +};
Please don't use lower case for enums. It's extremely confusing.
Thanks,
Saravana
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-30 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-24 12:25 [PATCH v5 00/14] Energy Aware Scheduling Quentin Perret
2018-07-24 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] sched: Relocate arch_scale_cpu_capacity Quentin Perret
2018-07-24 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] sched/cpufreq: Factor out utilization to frequency mapping Quentin Perret
2018-07-24 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] PM: Introduce an Energy Model management framework Quentin Perret
2018-08-09 21:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-08-10 8:15 ` Quentin Perret
2018-08-10 8:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-08-10 9:12 ` Quentin Perret
2018-08-10 11:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-08-10 12:30 ` Quentin Perret
2018-08-12 9:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-07-24 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] PM / EM: Expose the Energy Model in sysfs Quentin Perret
2018-07-24 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] sched/topology: Reference the Energy Model of CPUs when available Quentin Perret
2018-07-24 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] sched/topology: Lowest energy aware balancing sched_domain level pointer Quentin Perret
2018-07-26 16:00 ` Valentin Schneider
2018-07-26 17:01 ` Quentin Perret
2018-07-24 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] sched/topology: Introduce sched_energy_present static key Quentin Perret
2018-07-24 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] sched/fair: Clean-up update_sg_lb_stats parameters Quentin Perret
2018-07-24 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] sched: Add over-utilization/tipping point indicator Quentin Perret
2018-08-02 12:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-02 13:03 ` Quentin Perret
2018-08-02 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-02 13:18 ` Quentin Perret
2018-08-02 13:48 ` Vincent Guittot
2018-08-02 14:14 ` Quentin Perret
2018-08-02 15:14 ` Vincent Guittot
2018-08-02 15:30 ` Quentin Perret
2018-08-02 15:55 ` Vincent Guittot
2018-08-02 16:00 ` Quentin Perret
2018-08-02 16:07 ` Vincent Guittot
2018-08-02 16:10 ` Quentin Perret
2018-08-02 16:38 ` Vincent Guittot
2018-08-02 16:59 ` Quentin Perret
2018-08-03 7:48 ` Vincent Guittot
2018-08-03 8:18 ` Quentin Perret
2018-08-03 13:49 ` Vincent Guittot
2018-08-03 14:21 ` Vincent Guittot
2018-08-03 15:55 ` Quentin Perret
2018-08-06 8:40 ` Vincent Guittot
2018-08-06 9:43 ` Quentin Perret
2018-08-06 10:45 ` Vincent Guittot
2018-08-06 11:02 ` Quentin Perret
2018-08-06 10:08 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2018-08-06 10:33 ` Vincent Guittot
2018-08-06 12:29 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2018-08-06 12:37 ` Vincent Guittot
2018-08-06 13:20 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2018-08-09 9:30 ` Vincent Guittot
2018-08-09 9:38 ` Quentin Perret
2018-07-24 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] sched/cpufreq: Refactor the utilization aggregation method Quentin Perret
2018-07-30 19:35 ` skannan [this message]
2018-07-31 7:59 ` Quentin Perret
2018-07-31 19:31 ` skannan
2018-08-01 7:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-08-01 8:23 ` Quentin Perret
2018-08-01 8:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-08-01 9:23 ` Quentin Perret
2018-08-01 9:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-08-02 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-02 15:39 ` Quentin Perret
2018-08-03 13:04 ` Quentin Perret
2018-08-02 12:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-02 12:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-02 15:21 ` Quentin Perret
2018-08-02 17:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-03 12:42 ` Quentin Perret
2018-07-24 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] sched/fair: Introduce an energy estimation helper function Quentin Perret
2018-07-24 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] sched/fair: Select an energy-efficient CPU on task wake-up Quentin Perret
2018-08-02 13:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-02 16:21 ` Quentin Perret
2018-07-24 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] OPTIONAL: arch_topology: Start Energy Aware Scheduling Quentin Perret
2018-07-24 12:25 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] OPTIONAL: cpufreq: dt: Register an Energy Model Quentin Perret
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=331552975e858911db66bc78c2c8e720@codeaurora.org \
--to=skannan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=adharmap@quicinc.com \
--cc=chris.redpath@arm.com \
--cc=currojerez@riseup.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=javi.merino@kernel.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pkondeti@codeaurora.org \
--cc=quentin.perret@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=skannan@quicinc.com \
--cc=smuckle@google.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=thara.gopinath@linaro.org \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).