linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexdeucher@gmail.com>,
	"Michel Dänzer" <michel@daenzer.net>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"amd-gfx list" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang@amd.com>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	"Zhang, Jerry" <Jerry.Zhang@amd.com>,
	"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>,
	"Sean Paul" <sean@poorly.run>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drm: disable WC optimization for cache coherent devices on non-x86
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:37:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40ad3ae7-9970-0cb9-d35c-05e128f83820@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_2f0FaJ+Th7H48u4GrPX=MM9xw0fFjdwhfRrr1nhgEkA@mail.gmail.com>

Am 24.01.19 um 12:26 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 12:23, Koenig, Christian
> <Christian.Koenig@amd.com> wrote:
>> Am 24.01.19 um 10:59 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel:
>>> [SNIP]
>>> This is *exactly* my point the whole time.
>>>
>>> The current code has
>>>
>>> static inline bool drm_arch_can_wc_memory(void)
>>> {
>>> #if defined(CONFIG_PPC) && !defined(CONFIG_NOT_COHERENT_CACHE)
>>>      return false;
>>>
>>> which means the optimization is disabled *unless the system is
>>> non-cache coherent*
>>>
>>> So if you have reports that the optimization works on some PowerPC, it
>>> must be non-cache coherent PowerPC, because that is the only place
>>> where it is enabled in the first place.
>>>
>>>> The only problematic here actually seems to be ARM, so you should
>>>> probably just add an "#ifdef .._ARM return false;".
>>>>
>>> ARM/arm64 does not have a Kconfig symbol like
>>> CONFIG_NOT_COHERENT_CACHE, so we can only disable it everywhere. If
>>> there are non-coherent ARM systems that are currently working in the
>>> same way as those non-coherent PowerPC systems, we will break them by
>>> doing this.
>> Summing the things I've read so far for ARM up I actually think it
>> depends on a runtime configuration and not on compile time one.
>>
>> So the whole idea of providing the device to the drm_*_can_wc_memory()
>> function isn't so far fetched.
>>
> Thank you.
>
>> But for now I do prefer working and slightly slower system over broken
>> one, so I think we should just disable this on ARM for now.
>>
> Again, this is not about non-cache coherent being slower without the
> optimization, it is about non-cache coherent likely not working *at
> all* unless the optimization is enabled.

As Michel tried to explain this CAN'T happen. The optimization is a 
purely optional request from userspace.

> Otherwise, the driver will vmap() DMA pages with cacheable attributes,
> while the non-cache coherent device uses uncached attributes, breaking
> coherency.

Again this is mandated by the userspace APIs anyway. E.g. we can't 
vmap() pages in any other way or our userspace APIs would break.

Regards,
Christian.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-24 11:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-21 10:06 [RFC PATCH] drm: disable WC optimization for cache coherent devices on non-x86 Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-21 10:11 ` Koenig, Christian
2019-01-21 15:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-21 15:33   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-21 15:59     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-21 16:14       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-21 16:22         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-21 16:30           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-21 16:35             ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-21 16:50               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-21 17:55             ` Michel Dänzer
2019-01-21 17:59               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-21 18:04                 ` Michel Dänzer
2019-01-21 18:20                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-21 18:23                     ` Michel Dänzer
2019-01-21 18:28                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-21 19:04                         ` Michel Dänzer
2019-01-21 19:18                           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-22  8:38                           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-22 20:56                             ` Alex Deucher
2019-01-22 21:07                               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-23  7:15                                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-23  9:08                                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-23 16:44                                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-23 16:52                                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-24  9:13                                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-24  9:25                                           ` Koenig, Christian
2019-01-24  9:28                                             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-24  9:45                                               ` Koenig, Christian
2019-01-24  9:59                                                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-24 11:23                                                   ` Koenig, Christian
2019-01-24 11:26                                                     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-24 11:37                                                       ` Koenig, Christian [this message]
2019-01-24 11:45                                                         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-24 13:54                                                           ` Alex Deucher
2019-01-24 13:57                                                             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-24 14:00                                                               ` Alex Deucher
2019-01-24 16:04                                                           ` Michel Dänzer
2019-01-24  9:31                                         ` Michel Dänzer
2019-01-24  9:37                                           ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40ad3ae7-9970-0cb9-d35c-05e128f83820@amd.com \
    --to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=Jerry.Zhang@amd.com \
    --cc=Ray.Huang@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@bootlin.com \
    --cc=michel@daenzer.net \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).