linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
To: "Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>
Cc: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexdeucher@gmail.com>,
	"Michel Dänzer" <michel@daenzer.net>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"amd-gfx list" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang@amd.com>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	"Zhang, Jerry" <Jerry.Zhang@amd.com>,
	"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>,
	"Sean Paul" <sean@poorly.run>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drm: disable WC optimization for cache coherent devices on non-x86
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 10:28:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu_3LurSN-6w1WijPfpJpc+Pgu0YTnwTfMrXMF3-AKAnJA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bb559f74-4b1e-d5ee-74fb-b5dcd4a128cb@amd.com>

On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 10:25, Koenig, Christian
<Christian.Koenig@amd.com> wrote:
>
> Am 24.01.19 um 10:13 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 05:52:50PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> But my concern is that it seems likely that non-cache coherent
> >> implementations are relying on this hack as well. There must be a
> >> reason that this hack is only disabled for PowerPC platforms if they
> >> are cache coherent, for instance, and I suspect that that reason is
> >> that the hack is the only thing ensuring that the CPU mapping
> >> attributes match the device ones used for these buffers (the vmap()ed
> >> ones), whereas the rings and other consistent data structures are
> >> using the DMA API as intended, and thus getting uncached attributes in
> >> the correct way.
> > Dave, who added that commit is on Cc together with just about everyone
> > involved in the review chain.  Based on the previous explanation
> > that idea what we might want an uncached mapping for some non-coherent
> > architectures for this to work at all makes sense, but then again
> > the way to create those mappings is entirely architecture specific,
> > and also need a cache flushing before creating the mapping to work
> > properly.  So my working theory is that this code never properly
> > worked on architectures without DMA coherent for PCIe at all, but
> > I'd love to be corrected by concrete examples including an explanation
> > of how it actually ends up working.
>
> Cache coherency is mandatory for modern GPU operation.
>
> Otherwise you can't implement a bunch of the requirements of the
> userspace APIs.
>
> In other words the applications doesn't inform the driver that the GPU
> or the CPU is accessing data, it just does it and assumes that it works.
>

Wonderful!

In that case, do you have any objections to the patch proposed by
Christoph above?

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-24  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-21 10:06 [RFC PATCH] drm: disable WC optimization for cache coherent devices on non-x86 Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-21 10:11 ` Koenig, Christian
2019-01-21 15:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-21 15:33   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-21 15:59     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-21 16:14       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-21 16:22         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-21 16:30           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-21 16:35             ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-21 16:50               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-21 17:55             ` Michel Dänzer
2019-01-21 17:59               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-21 18:04                 ` Michel Dänzer
2019-01-21 18:20                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-21 18:23                     ` Michel Dänzer
2019-01-21 18:28                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-21 19:04                         ` Michel Dänzer
2019-01-21 19:18                           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-22  8:38                           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-22 20:56                             ` Alex Deucher
2019-01-22 21:07                               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-23  7:15                                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-23  9:08                                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-23 16:44                                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-23 16:52                                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-24  9:13                                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-24  9:25                                           ` Koenig, Christian
2019-01-24  9:28                                             ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2019-01-24  9:45                                               ` Koenig, Christian
2019-01-24  9:59                                                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-24 11:23                                                   ` Koenig, Christian
2019-01-24 11:26                                                     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-24 11:37                                                       ` Koenig, Christian
2019-01-24 11:45                                                         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-24 13:54                                                           ` Alex Deucher
2019-01-24 13:57                                                             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-24 14:00                                                               ` Alex Deucher
2019-01-24 16:04                                                           ` Michel Dänzer
2019-01-24  9:31                                         ` Michel Dänzer
2019-01-24  9:37                                           ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKv+Gu_3LurSN-6w1WijPfpJpc+Pgu0YTnwTfMrXMF3-AKAnJA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=Christian.Koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=Jerry.Zhang@amd.com \
    --cc=Ray.Huang@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@bootlin.com \
    --cc=michel@daenzer.net \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).