From: George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>
To: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 00/21] hrtimer - High-resolution timer subsystem
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:38:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <439F5B91.4010903@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17594.192.54.193.25.1134477932.squirrel@rousalka.dyndns.org>
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> "This is your interpretation and I disagree.
>
> If I set up a timer with a 24 hour interval, which should go off
> everyday at 6:00 AM, then I expect that this timer does this even when
> the clock is set e.g. by daylight saving. I think, that this is a
> completely valid interpretation and makes a lot of sense from a
> practical point of view. The existing implementation does it that way
> already, so why do we want to change this ?"
I think that there is a miss understanding here. The kernel timers,
at this time, do not know or care about daylight savings time. This
is not really a clock set but a time zone change which does not
intrude on the kernels notion of time (that being, more or less UTC).
>
> Please do not hardcode anywhere 1 day = 24h or something like this.
> Relative timers should stay relative not depend on DST.
As far as timers go, it is only the user who understands any
abstraction above the second. I.e. hour, day, min. all are
abstractions done in user land.
There is, however, one exception, the leap second. The kernel inserts
this at midnight UTC and does use a fixed constant (86400) to find
midnight.
>
> If someone needs a timer that sets of everyday at the same (legal) time,
> make him ask for everyday at that time not one time + n x 24h.
>
> Some processes need an exact legal hour
> Other processes need an exact duration
I think what we are saying is that ABS time flag says that the timer
is supposed to expire at the given time "by the specified clock",
however that time is arrived at, be it the initial time or the initial
time plus one or more intervals. We are NOT saying that these
intervals are the same size, but only that the given clock says that
they are the same size, thus any clock setting done during an interval
can cause that interval to be of a different size.
Without the ABS time flag, we are talking about intervals (the initial
and subsequent) that are NOT affected by clock setting and are thus as
close to the requested duration as possible.
>
> In a DST world that's not the same thing at all - don't assume one or the
> other, have coders request exactly what they need and everyone will be
> happy.
This is why the standard introduced the ABS time flag. It does NOT,
however, IMHO touch on the issue of time zone changes introduced by
shifting into and out of day light savings time.
>
> I can tell from experience trying to fix code which assumed one day = 24h
> is not fun at all. And yes sometimes the difference between legal and UTC
> time matters a lot.
>
--
George Anzinger george@mvista.com
HRT (High-res-timers): http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-13 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-13 12:45 [patch 00/21] hrtimer - High-resolution timer subsystem Nicolas Mailhot
2005-12-13 23:38 ` George Anzinger [this message]
2005-12-14 8:58 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-12-14 10:03 ` Nicolas Mailhot
2005-12-15 1:11 ` George Anzinger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-12-06 0:01 tglx
2005-12-06 17:32 ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-06 19:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-07 3:05 ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-08 5:18 ` Paul Jackson
2005-12-08 8:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-08 9:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-08 13:08 ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-08 15:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-06 22:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-12-07 3:11 ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-06 22:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-12-07 9:31 ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-07 10:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-07 10:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-07 10:23 ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-07 10:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-07 11:09 ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-07 11:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-07 11:40 ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-07 13:06 ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-07 12:40 ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-07 23:12 ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-07 12:18 ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-07 16:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-07 17:17 ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-07 17:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-07 18:18 ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-07 18:02 ` Paul Baxter
2005-12-09 17:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-12-12 13:39 ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-12 16:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-12-12 18:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-12-13 1:25 ` George Anzinger
2005-12-13 9:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-12-15 1:35 ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-15 2:29 ` George Anzinger
2005-12-19 14:56 ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-19 20:54 ` George Anzinger
2005-12-21 23:03 ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-22 4:30 ` George Anzinger
2005-12-14 20:48 ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-14 22:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-12-15 0:55 ` George Anzinger
2005-12-15 14:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-19 14:50 ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-19 22:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=439F5B91.4010903@mvista.com \
--to=george@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).