From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add device tree node for LLCC
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 19:28:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48278c3db41c3f46eac8892d1383444c@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <161436514295.1254594.2789904935200051795@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
On 2021-02-27 00:15, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2021-02-26 00:04:27)
>> On 2021-02-26 01:07, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> > Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2021-02-25 01:30:19)
>> >> Add a DT node for Last level cache (aka. system cache)
>> >> controller which provides control over the last level
>> >> cache present on SC7280 SoC.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
>> >> ---
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
>> >
>> > Should add system-cache-controller to the devicetree spec. Or just use
>> > cache-controller for the node name.
>>
>> This was as per discussion in [1][2] where dt-schema throws an error
>> since it expects cache-level to be associated with cache-controller.
>>
>
> Ah right. Can you add system-cache-controller to the dt spec?
Sure, I'll add it. Hopefully that won't have to block this change?
Because I might need some time to get permissions to add it there.
Thanks,
Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-27 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-25 9:30 [PATCH 0/9] qcom/sc7280: Enable various hardware blocks on SC7280 SoC Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 9:30 ` [PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: arm: msm: Add LLCC for SC7280 Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 19:35 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-06 20:47 ` Rob Herring
2021-02-25 9:30 ` [PATCH 2/9] soc: qcom: llcc: Add configuration data " Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 9:30 ` [PATCH 3/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add device tree node for LLCC Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 19:37 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-26 8:04 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-26 18:45 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-27 13:58 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan [this message]
2021-03-01 4:21 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-25 9:30 ` [PATCH 4/9] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom-ipcc: Add compatible for SC7280 Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 14:13 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-02-25 19:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-25 9:30 ` [PATCH 5/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add IPCC for SC7280 SoC Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 14:12 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-02-25 19:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-25 9:30 ` [PATCH 6/9] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: aoss: Add SC7280 compatible Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 19:40 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-06 20:53 ` Rob Herring
2021-02-25 9:30 ` [PATCH 7/9] soc: qcom: aoss: Add AOSS QMP support for SC7280 Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 19:40 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-25 9:30 ` [PATCH 8/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add AOSS QMP node Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 19:41 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-26 7:51 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-26 18:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-27 13:56 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-03-09 5:58 ` Sibi Sankar
2021-03-23 3:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-24 7:05 ` Sibi Sankar
2021-02-25 9:30 ` [PATCH 9/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add Coresight support Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-03-11 23:14 ` [PATCH 0/9] qcom/sc7280: Enable various hardware blocks on SC7280 SoC Bjorn Andersson
2021-03-14 19:05 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48278c3db41c3f46eac8892d1383444c@codeaurora.org \
--to=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sibis@codeaurora.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).