Re: [PATCH 2/3] xhci: Wait until link state trainsits to U0 after setting USB_SS_PORT_LS_U0

[Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>]

On 13.1.2020 11.18, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 11:27 PM Mathias Nyman
> <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 3.1.2020 10.40, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
>>> Like U3 case, xHCI spec doesn't specify the upper bound of U0 transition
>>> time. The 20ms is not enough for some devices.
>>>
>>> Intead of polling PLS or PLC, we can facilitate the port change event to
>>> know that the link transits to U0 is completed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c  | 8 +++++++-
>>>    drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c  | 1 +
>>>    drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 1 +
>>>    drivers/usb/host/xhci.h      | 1 +
>>>    4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
>>> index 2b2e9d004dbf..07886a1bce62 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
>>> @@ -1310,11 +1310,17 @@ int xhci_hub_control(struct usb_hcd *hcd, u16 typeReq, u16 wValue,
>>>                                        spin_lock_irqsave(&xhci->lock, flags);
>>>                                }
>>>                        }
>>> +                     if (link_state == USB_SS_PORT_LS_U0)
>>> +                             reinit_completion(&ports[wIndex]->link_state_changed);
>>
>> All the other suspend and resume related port flags/completions are
>> in struct xhci_bus_state. See for example rexit_done[].
>> Not sure that is a better place but at least it would be consistent.
>>
>> Could actually make sense to move more of them to the xhci_port structure,
>> but perhaps in some later suspend/resume rework patch.
> 
> Ok. Should I keep this part of the patch as is? Or move it to
> xhci_bus_state and probably move it back to xhci_port in later rework
> patch?

Maybe move it to xhci_bus_state for now.

> 
>>>
>>>                        xhci_set_link_state(xhci, ports[wIndex], link_state);
>>>
>>>                        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xhci->lock, flags);
>>> -                     msleep(20); /* wait device to enter */
>>> +                     if (link_state == USB_SS_PORT_LS_U0) {
>>> +                             if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&ports[wIndex]->link_state_changed, msecs_to_jiffies(100)))
>>> +                                     xhci_dbg(xhci, "missing U0 port change event for port %d-%d\n", hcd->self.busnum, wIndex + 1);
>>
>> We might be waiting for completion here in unnecessary.
>> No completion is called if port is already in U0, either set by
>> xhci_bus_resume(), or we race with a device initiated resume.
> 
> Is there a way to know if device initiated resume is inplace?

Yes, before xhci interrupt handler handles the device initiated resume PLS
is XDEV_RESUME and PLC is set.

After the interrupt handler PLS goes from XDEV_RESUME to XDEV_RECOVERY to XDEV_U0.
A bit is set for bus_state->port_remote_wakeup, and on usb core side
also bus->resuming_ports |= bit is set, (having both may be a bit redundant, we might
be able to get rid of bus_state->port_remote_wakeup, but not right now)

> 
>>
>> Maybe read the current port link state first, and don't do anything if it's
>> already in U0, or fail if it's in a state where we can't resume to U0.
> 
> What happens if device initiated resume happens right after we query the PLS?

Not sure, fortunately the drivers task is to write XDEV_U0 to PLS both when
we want a host initiated resume, or when we want to react on a device initiated
resume. So hopefully that's ok, but this race exists.

Better keep calling completion for both host and device initiated resume cases
when port reaches U0/U1/U2 to avoid waiting for the completion unnecessary,
like you current patch does.
  
-Mathias