linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
	Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>,
	"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
	"kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" 
	<kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-security-module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 05/11] seccomp: Split put_seccomp_filter() with put_seccomp()
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 00:18:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <96024881-1bcc-33af-6285-d9a904de963e@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b420ecc-f062-8ab3-0b18-e09c60a00c6a@digikod.net>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4752 bytes --]


On 19/04/2017 00:47, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> 
> On 19/04/2017 00:23, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> wrote:
>>> The semantic is unchanged. This will be useful for the Landlock
>>> integration with seccomp (next commit).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
>>> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>>> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
>>> Cc: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
>>> ---
>>>  include/linux/seccomp.h |  4 ++--
>>>  kernel/fork.c           |  2 +-
>>>  kernel/seccomp.c        | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>>>  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/seccomp.h b/include/linux/seccomp.h
>>> index ecc296c137cd..e25aee2cdfc0 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/seccomp.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/seccomp.h
>>> @@ -77,10 +77,10 @@ static inline int seccomp_mode(struct seccomp *s)
>>>  #endif /* CONFIG_SECCOMP */
>>>
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER
>>> -extern void put_seccomp_filter(struct task_struct *tsk);
>>> +extern void put_seccomp(struct task_struct *tsk);
>>>  extern void get_seccomp_filter(struct task_struct *tsk);
>>>  #else  /* CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER */
>>> -static inline void put_seccomp_filter(struct task_struct *tsk)
>>> +static inline void put_seccomp(struct task_struct *tsk)
>>>  {
>>>         return;
>>>  }
>>> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
>>> index 6c463c80e93d..a27d8e67ce33 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/fork.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
>>> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ void free_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
>>>  #endif
>>>         rt_mutex_debug_task_free(tsk);
>>>         ftrace_graph_exit_task(tsk);
>>> -       put_seccomp_filter(tsk);
>>> +       put_seccomp(tsk);
>>>         arch_release_task_struct(tsk);
>>>         if (tsk->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
>>>                 free_kthread_struct(tsk);
>>> diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
>>> index 65f61077ad50..326f79e32127 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/seccomp.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
>>> @@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ struct seccomp_filter {
>>>  /* Limit any path through the tree to 256KB worth of instructions. */
>>>  #define MAX_INSNS_PER_PATH ((1 << 18) / sizeof(struct sock_filter))
>>>
>>> +static void put_seccomp_filter(struct seccomp_filter *filter);
>>
>> Can this be reorganized easily to avoid a forward-declaration?
> 
> I didn't want to move too much code but I will.
> 
>>
>>> +
>>>  /*
>>>   * Endianness is explicitly ignored and left for BPF program authors to manage
>>>   * as per the specific architecture.
>>> @@ -314,7 +316,7 @@ static inline void seccomp_sync_threads(void)
>>>                  * current's path will hold a reference.  (This also
>>>                  * allows a put before the assignment.)
>>>                  */
>>> -               put_seccomp_filter(thread);
>>> +               put_seccomp_filter(thread->seccomp.filter);
>>>                 smp_store_release(&thread->seccomp.filter,
>>>                                   caller->seccomp.filter);
>>>
>>> @@ -476,10 +478,11 @@ static inline void seccomp_filter_free(struct seccomp_filter *filter)
>>>         }
>>>  }
>>>
>>> -/* put_seccomp_filter - decrements the ref count of tsk->seccomp.filter */
>>> -void put_seccomp_filter(struct task_struct *tsk)
>>> +/* put_seccomp_filter - decrements the ref count of a filter */
>>> +static void put_seccomp_filter(struct seccomp_filter *filter)
>>>  {
>>> -       struct seccomp_filter *orig = tsk->seccomp.filter;
>>> +       struct seccomp_filter *orig = filter;
>>> +
>>>         /* Clean up single-reference branches iteratively. */
>>>         while (orig && atomic_dec_and_test(&orig->usage)) {
>>>                 struct seccomp_filter *freeme = orig;
>>> @@ -488,6 +491,11 @@ void put_seccomp_filter(struct task_struct *tsk)
>>>         }
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +void put_seccomp(struct task_struct *tsk)
>>> +{
>>> +       put_seccomp_filter(tsk->seccomp.filter);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  static void seccomp_init_siginfo(siginfo_t *info, int syscall, int reason)
>>>  {
>>>         memset(info, 0, sizeof(*info));
>>> @@ -914,7 +922,7 @@ long seccomp_get_filter(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long filter_off,
>>>         if (copy_to_user(data, fprog->filter, bpf_classic_proglen(fprog)))
>>>                 ret = -EFAULT;
>>>
>>> -       put_seccomp_filter(task);
>>> +       put_seccomp_filter(task->seccomp.filter);
>>>         return ret;
>>
>> I don't like that the arguments to get_seccomp_filter() and
>> put_seccomp_filter() are now different. I think they should match for
>> readability.
> 
> OK, I can do that.
> 

Kees, can I send this as a separate patch?


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-19 22:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-28 23:46 [PATCH net-next v6 00/11] Landlock LSM: Toward unprivileged sandboxing Mickaël Salaün
2017-03-28 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v6 01/11] bpf: Add eBPF program subtype and is_valid_subtype() verifier Mickaël Salaün
2017-03-29 13:48   ` kbuild test robot
2017-04-18 21:48   ` Kees Cook
2017-03-28 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v6 02/11] bpf,landlock: Define an eBPF program type for Landlock Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-16 21:57   ` Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-18 21:58   ` Kees Cook
2017-03-28 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v6 03/11] bpf: Define handle_fs and add a new helper bpf_handle_fs_get_mode() Mickaël Salaün
2017-03-28 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v6 04/11] landlock: Add LSM hooks related to filesystem Mickaël Salaün
2017-03-29 15:18   ` kbuild test robot
2017-04-18 22:17   ` Kees Cook
2017-04-18 22:44     ` Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-18 23:16       ` Casey Schaufler
2017-04-18 23:40         ` Kees Cook
2017-04-19 22:03           ` Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-19 23:58             ` [kernel-hardening] " Casey Schaufler
2017-04-20  1:48             ` Kees Cook
2017-04-18 23:39       ` Kees Cook
2017-03-28 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v6 05/11] seccomp: Split put_seccomp_filter() with put_seccomp() Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-18 22:23   ` Kees Cook
2017-04-18 22:47     ` Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-19 22:18       ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2017-04-20  1:54         ` Kees Cook
2017-03-28 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v6 06/11] seccomp,landlock: Handle Landlock events per process hierarchy Mickaël Salaün
2017-03-29 10:35   ` [kernel-hardening] " Djalal Harouni
2017-03-31 21:15     ` Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-18 22:54       ` Kees Cook
2017-04-18 22:53   ` Kees Cook
2017-04-18 23:24     ` Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-18 23:48       ` Kees Cook
2017-03-28 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v6 07/11] landlock: Add ptrace restrictions Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-10  6:48   ` [kernel-hardening] " Djalal Harouni
2017-04-11  7:19     ` Mickaël Salaün
2017-03-28 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v6 08/11] bpf: Add a Landlock sandbox example Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-18 23:06   ` Kees Cook
2017-04-18 23:35     ` Mickaël Salaün
2017-03-28 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v6 09/11] seccomp: Enhance test_harness with an assert step mechanism Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-19  0:02   ` Kees Cook
2017-04-19 21:51     ` Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-19 22:02       ` Kees Cook
2017-04-19 22:05         ` Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-20  1:50           ` Kees Cook
2017-03-28 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v6 10/11] bpf,landlock: Add tests for Landlock Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-18 23:16   ` Kees Cook
2017-04-18 23:53     ` Mickaël Salaün
2017-04-18 23:59       ` Kees Cook
2017-03-28 23:46 ` [PATCH net-next v6 11/11] landlock: Add user and kernel documentation " Mickaël Salaün
2017-03-29 15:58   ` kbuild test robot
2017-04-18 23:26 ` [PATCH net-next v6 00/11] Landlock LSM: Toward unprivileged sandboxing Kees Cook
2017-04-19  0:12   ` Mickaël Salaün

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=96024881-1bcc-33af-6285-d9a904de963e@digikod.net \
    --to=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=drysdale@google.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
    --cc=jann@thejh.net \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=sargun@sargun.me \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH net-next v6 05/11] seccomp: Split put_seccomp_filter() with put_seccomp()' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).