linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] gpio: make gpiochip_get_desc() gpiolib-private
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 12:10:31 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAVeFuJAudOY-s3x38sv13SNo8zfofLWKOKBhKQPYAm1fAj4kw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140722201740.GA11459@roeck-us.net>

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:17 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 04:17:41PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> As GPIO descriptors are not going to remain unique anymore, having this
>> function public is not safe. Restrain its use to gpiolib since we have
>> no user outside of it.
>>
> If I implement a gpio chip driver built as module, and I want to use
> gpiochip_request_own_desc(), how am I supposed to get desc ?
>
> I understand that there is still gpio_to_desc(), but I would have thought
> that
>         desc = gpiochip_get_desc(chip, pin);
> would be better than
>         desc = gpio_to_desc(chip->base + pin);
>
> Not that it makes much of a difference for me, just asking.

Actually I was thinking of changing the prototype of
gpiochip_request_own_desc(), and your comment definitely strenghtens
that idea. gpiochip functions should not work with descriptors,
especially since we are going to switch to a multiple-consumer scheme
where there won't be any canonical descriptor anymore. Thus, how about
turning gpiochip_request_own_desc() into this:

struct gpio_desc *
gpiochip_request_own_desc(struct gpio_chip *chip, u16 hwnum, const char *label);

which would basically do both the gpiochip_get_desc() and former
gpiochip_request_own_desc() in one call. I think it should satisfy
everybody and removes the need to have gpiochip_get_desc() (a not very
useful function by itself) exposed out of gpiolib.

I will send a patch taking care of this if you agree that makes sense.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-23  3:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-22  7:17 [PATCH 0/5] gpio: a few cleanup patches Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-22  7:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] gpio: remove export of private of_get_named_gpio_flags() Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-23 15:36   ` Linus Walleij
2014-07-22  7:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] gpio: simplify gpiochip_export() Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-23 15:38   ` Linus Walleij
2014-07-22  7:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] gpio: make gpiochip_get_desc() gpiolib-private Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-22 20:17   ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-23  3:10     ` Alexandre Courbot [this message]
2014-07-23  3:47       ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-23  5:39         ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-23  6:21           ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-23 14:48             ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-23 15:41   ` Linus Walleij
2014-07-22  7:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] gpio: remove gpiod_lock/unlock_as_irq() Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-23 15:45   ` Linus Walleij
2014-07-22  7:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] gpio: move gpio_ensure_requested() into legacy C file Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-22  8:30   ` Varka Bhadram
2014-07-23 15:48   ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAAVeFuJAudOY-s3x38sv13SNo8zfofLWKOKBhKQPYAm1fAj4kw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).