From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Cc: "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] gpio: remove gpiod_lock/unlock_as_irq()
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:45:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZCJ2-2fx+1FGfvK6uvMG9oEH7RHCU8r50aoxKgSTjU6Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406013463-19218-5-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com>
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> wrote:
> gpio_lock/unlock_as_irq() are working with (chip, offset) arguments and
> are thus not using the old integer namespace. Therefore, there is no
> reason to have gpiod variants of these functions working with
> descriptors, especially since the (chip, offset) tuple is more suitable
> to the users of these functions (GPIO drivers, whereas GPIO descriptors
> are targeted at GPIO consumers).
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Argh the mess is likely my fault for not having wrapped my head around
descriptors properly at the time.
Patch applied, naturally.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-23 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-22 7:17 [PATCH 0/5] gpio: a few cleanup patches Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-22 7:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] gpio: remove export of private of_get_named_gpio_flags() Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-23 15:36 ` Linus Walleij
2014-07-22 7:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] gpio: simplify gpiochip_export() Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-23 15:38 ` Linus Walleij
2014-07-22 7:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] gpio: make gpiochip_get_desc() gpiolib-private Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-22 20:17 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-23 3:10 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-23 3:47 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-23 5:39 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-23 6:21 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-07-23 14:48 ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-23 15:41 ` Linus Walleij
2014-07-22 7:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] gpio: remove gpiod_lock/unlock_as_irq() Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-23 15:45 ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2014-07-22 7:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] gpio: move gpio_ensure_requested() into legacy C file Alexandre Courbot
2014-07-22 8:30 ` Varka Bhadram
2014-07-23 15:48 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACRpkdZCJ2-2fx+1FGfvK6uvMG9oEH7RHCU8r50aoxKgSTjU6Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).