From: Steve Rutherford <srutherford@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Filippo Sironi" <sironi@amazon.de>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"KVM list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Allow userspace to define what's the microcode version
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:09:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABayD+dirdj9k=y=yKKJos+Wp-Yh91aO8RJwqMP-1UP54qD3+w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <510cf2fb-1d53-485f-bfd1-3d852378c866@redhat.com>
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 3:58 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 26/11/2017 17:41, Filippo Sironi wrote:
>> ... that the guest should see.
>> Guest operating systems may check the microcode version to decide whether
>> to disable certain features that are known to be buggy up to certain
>> microcode versions. Address the issue by making the microcode version
>> that the guest should see settable.
>> The rationale for having userspace specifying the microcode version, rather
>> than having the kernel picking it, is to ensure consistency for live-migrated
>> instances; we don't want them to see a microcode version increase without a
>> reset.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Filippo Sironi <sironi@amazon.de>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 3 +++
>> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index 925c3e29cad3..741588f27ebc 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -4033,6 +4033,29 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
>> } u;
>>
>> switch (ioctl) {
>> + case KVM_GET_MICROCODE_VERSION: {
>> + r = -EFAULT;
>> + if (copy_to_user(argp,
>> + &kvm->arch.microcode_version,
>> + sizeof(kvm->arch.microcode_version)))
>> + goto out;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + case KVM_SET_MICROCODE_VERSION: {
>> + u32 microcode_version;
>> +
>> + r = -EFAULT;
>> + if (copy_from_user(µcode_version,
>> + argp,
>> + sizeof(microcode_version)))
>> + goto out;
>> + r = -EINVAL;
>> + if (!microcode_version)
>> + goto out;
>> + kvm->arch.microcode_version = microcode_version;
>> + r = 0;
>> + break;
>> + }
>
> Also, there's no need to define new ioctls, instead you can just place
> it in the vcpu and use KVM_GET_MSR/KVM_SET_MSR. I'd agree that's
> slightly less polished, but it matches what we do already for e.g.
> nested VMX model specific registers. And it spares you for writing the
> documentation that you didn't include in this patch. :)
>
> Paolo
This feels good time to mention Peter Hornyack's old MSR KVM_EXIT
patches. With something like them, there would be no need to push this
into the kernel at all.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-27 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-26 16:41 [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: Store the microcode version in struct kvm_arch Filippo Sironi
2017-11-26 16:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Allow userspace to define what's the microcode version Filippo Sironi
2017-11-27 1:02 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-12-09 7:21 ` Sironi, Filippo
2017-11-27 10:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-12-09 7:33 ` Sironi, Filippo
2017-11-27 11:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-11-27 22:09 ` Steve Rutherford [this message]
2017-12-09 7:51 ` Sironi, Filippo
2017-12-09 7:42 ` Sironi, Filippo
2017-12-11 16:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CABayD+dirdj9k=y=yKKJos+Wp-Yh91aO8RJwqMP-1UP54qD3+w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=srutherford@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=sironi@amazon.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).