From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
Ryan Lortie <desrt@desrt.ca>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>,
Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>, Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Tony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 7/7] shm: isolate pinned pages when sealing files
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 08:06:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCETrWaUsq_D2Z1PwbbwQQWKrnsWTLOdUR6bqPuedi8ZHgvEQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402655819-14325-8-git-send-email-dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 3:36 AM, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> wrote:
> When setting SEAL_WRITE, we must make sure nobody has a writable reference
> to the pages (via GUP or similar). We currently check references and wait
> some time for them to be dropped. This, however, might fail for several
> reasons, including:
> - the page is pinned for longer than we wait
> - while we wait, someone takes an already pinned page for read-access
>
> Therefore, this patch introduces page-isolation. When sealing a file with
> SEAL_WRITE, we copy all pages that have an elevated ref-count. The newpage
> is put in place atomically, the old page is detached and left alone. It
> will get reclaimed once the last external user dropped it.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Won't this have unexpected effects?
Thread 1: start read into mapping backed by fd
Thread 2: SEAL_WRITE
Thread 1: read finishes. now the page doesn't match the sealed page
Is this okay? Or am I missing something?
Are there really things that keep unnecessary writable pins around?
--Andy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-13 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-13 10:36 [PATCH v3 0/7] File Sealing & memfd_create() David Herrmann
2014-06-13 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] mm: allow drivers to prevent new writable mappings David Herrmann
2014-07-09 8:55 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-07-19 16:12 ` David Herrmann
2014-06-13 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] shm: add sealing API David Herrmann
2014-07-16 10:06 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-07-19 16:17 ` David Herrmann
2014-06-13 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] shm: add memfd_create() syscall David Herrmann
2014-06-13 12:27 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-06-13 12:41 ` David Herrmann
2014-06-13 14:20 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-06-13 16:20 ` John Stultz
2014-06-16 4:12 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-07-08 18:39 ` David Herrmann
2014-06-15 10:50 ` Jann Horn
2014-07-16 10:07 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-07-19 16:29 ` David Herrmann
2014-06-13 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] selftests: add memfd_create() + sealing tests David Herrmann
2014-07-16 10:07 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-07-19 16:31 ` David Herrmann
2014-06-13 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] selftests: add memfd/sealing page-pinning tests David Herrmann
2014-07-16 10:08 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-07-19 16:32 ` David Herrmann
2014-06-13 10:36 ` [RFC v3 6/7] shm: wait for pins to be released when sealing David Herrmann
2014-07-16 10:09 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-07-19 16:36 ` David Herrmann
2014-06-13 10:36 ` [RFC v3 7/7] shm: isolate pinned pages when sealing files David Herrmann
2014-06-13 15:06 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2014-06-13 15:27 ` David Herrmann
2014-06-13 17:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-09 8:57 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-07-19 16:40 ` David Herrmann
2014-06-13 15:10 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] File Sealing & memfd_create() Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-13 15:15 ` David Herrmann
2014-06-13 15:17 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-13 15:33 ` David Herrmann
2014-06-17 9:54 ` Florian Weimer
2014-06-17 10:01 ` David Herrmann
2014-06-17 10:04 ` Florian Weimer
2014-06-17 10:10 ` David Herrmann
2014-06-17 12:13 ` Florian Weimer
2014-06-17 13:26 ` David Herrmann
[not found] ` <CALCETrVpZ0vFM4usHK+tQhk234Y2jWzB1522kGcGvdQQFAqsZQ@mail.gmail.com>
2014-06-17 16:36 ` David Herrmann
2014-06-17 16:41 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-17 16:51 ` David Herrmann
2014-06-17 17:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-17 20:31 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-06-17 21:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-08 16:54 ` David Herrmann
2014-07-09 8:53 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALCETrWaUsq_D2Z1PwbbwQQWKrnsWTLOdUR6bqPuedi8ZHgvEQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=desrt@desrt.ca \
--cc=dh.herrmann@gmail.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kay@vrfy.org \
--cc=lennart@poettering.net \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=tonyb@cybernetics.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zonque@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).