From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Oleg Rombakh <olegrom@google.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: cgroup SCHED_IDLE support
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 05:57:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YNb6CL6Q9CJnbB2R@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABk29NtcRUwskBjrvLKkEKQ0hpNPSrdzrGAGZy+bHSfnznOUSg@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 06:01:59PM -0700, Josh Don wrote:
> Consider a tree like
>
> root
> / \
> A C
> / \ |
> B idle t4
> | | \
> t1 t2 t3
>
> Here, 'idle' is our cpu.idle cgroup. The following properties would
> not be possible if we moved t2/t3 into SCHED_IDLE without the cgroup
> interface:
> - t1 always preempts t2/t3 on wakeup, but t4 does not
> - t2 and t3 have different, non-minimum weights. Technically we could
> also achieve this by adding another layer of nested cgroups, but that
> starts to make the hierarchy much more complex.
> - I've also discussed with Peter a possible extension (vruntime
> adjustments) to the current SCHED_IDLE semantics. Similarly to the
> first bullet here, we'd need a cgroup idle toggle to achieve certain
> scheduling behaviors with this.
Would you care to share some concrete use cases?
Thank you.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-26 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-08 23:11 [PATCH] sched: cgroup SCHED_IDLE support Josh Don
2021-06-10 12:53 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-06-10 19:14 ` Josh Don
2021-06-11 16:43 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-06-11 23:34 ` Josh Don
2021-06-15 10:06 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-06-15 23:30 ` Josh Don
2021-06-25 9:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-16 15:42 ` Tejun Heo
2021-06-17 1:01 ` Josh Don
2021-06-26 9:57 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2021-06-29 4:57 ` Josh Don
2021-06-25 8:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-26 10:06 ` Tejun Heo
2021-06-26 11:42 ` Rik van Riel
2021-06-25 8:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-26 0:18 ` Josh Don
2021-06-25 8:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-26 0:35 ` Josh Don
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YNb6CL6Q9CJnbB2R@mtj.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=olegrom@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).