Re: [Patch v5 2/4] memory: tegra: Add MC error logging on tegra186 onward

[Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>]

On 3/30/2022 5:36 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> On 3/16/22 12:25, Ashish Mhetre wrote:
>> Add new function 'get_int_channel' in tegra_mc_soc struture which is
>> implemented by tegra SOCs which support multiple MC channels. This
>> function returns the channel which should be used to get the information
>> of interrupts.
>> Remove static from tegra30_mc_handle_irq and use it as interrupt handler
>> for MC interrupts on tegra186, tegra194 and tegra234 to log the errors.
>> Add error specific MC status and address register bits and use them on
>> tegra186, tegra194 and tegra234.
>> Add error logging for generalized carveout interrupt on tegra186, tegra194
>> and tegra234.
>> Add error logging for route sanity interrupt on tegra194 an tegra234.
>> Add register for higher bits of error address which is available on
>> tegra194 and tegra234.
>> Add a boolean variable 'has_addr_hi_reg' in tegra_mc_soc struture which
>> will be true if soc has register for higher bits of memory controller
>> error address. Set it true for tegra194 and tegra234.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>
> 
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> 
> Reported what? You should add this tag only if patch addresses reported
> problem. This patch doesn't address anything, hence the tag is
> inappropriate, you should remove it.

Okay, smatch warning was reported on v4 of this patch which is fixed in
v5. Then I understand that we don't need to add Reported-by if we fix
bug in subsequent versions, right?