Re: B53 DSA switch problem on Banana Pi-R1 on Fedora 26

[Gerhard Wiesinger <lists@wiesinger.com>]

On 23.05.2018 19:47, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 05/23/2018 10:29 AM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>> On 23.05.2018 17:50, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 05/23/2018 08:28 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>> On 05/22/2018 09:49 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>>>>> On 22.05.2018 22:42, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>>>> On 05/22/2018 01:16 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>>>>>>> Planned network structure will be as with 4.7.x kernels:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> br0 <=> eth0.101 <=> eth0 (vlan 101 tagged) <=> lan 1-lan4 (vlan 101
>>>>>>>> untagged pvid)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> br1 <=> eth0.102 <=> eth0 (vlan 102 tagged) <=> wan (vlan 102
>>>>>>>> untagged pvid)
>>>>>>> Do you even need these vlans?
>>>>>> Yes, remember, b53 does not currently turn on Broadcom tags, so the
>>>>>> only
>>>>>> way to segregate traffic is to have VLANs for that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you doing this for port separation? To keep lan1-4 traffic
>>>>>>> separate from wan? DSA does that by default, no vlan needed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you can just do
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ip link add name br0 type bridge
>>>>>>> ip link set dev br0 up
>>>>>>> ip link set dev lan1 master br0
>>>>>>> ip link set dev lan2 master br0
>>>>>>> ip link set dev lan3 master br0
>>>>>>> ip link set dev lan4 master br0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and use interface wan directly, no bridge needed.
>>>>>> That would work once Broadcom tags are turned on which requires
>>>>>> turning
>>>>>> on managed mode, which requires work that I have not been able to get
>>>>>> done :)
>>>>> Setup with swconfig:
>>>>>
>>>>> #!/usr/bin/bash
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> INTERFACE=eth0
>>>>>
>>>>> # Delete all IP addresses and get link up
>>>>> ip addr flush dev ${INTERFACE}
>>>>> ip link set ${INTERFACE} up
>>>>>
>>>>> # Lamobo R1 aka BPi R1 Routerboard
>>>>> #
>>>>> # Speaker | LAN1 | LAN2 | LAN3 | LAN4 || LAN5 | HDMI
>>>>> # SW-Port |  P2  |  P1  |  P0  |  P4  ||  P3  |
>>>>> # VLAN    |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  ||ALL(t)|
>>>>> #
>>>>> # Switch-Port P8 - ALL(t) boards internal CPU Port
>>>>>
>>>>> # Setup switch
>>>>> swconfig dev ${INTERFACE} set reset 1
>>>>> swconfig dev ${INTERFACE} set enable_vlan 1
>>>>> swconfig dev ${INTERFACE} vlan 101 set ports '3 8t'
>>>>> swconfig dev ${INTERFACE} vlan 102 set ports '4 0 1 2 8t'
>>>>> swconfig dev ${INTERFACE} set apply 1
>>>>>
>>>>> How to achieve this setup CURRENTLY with DSA?
>>>> Your first email had the right programming sequence, but you did not
>>>> answer whether you have CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING enabled or not,
>>>> which is likely your problem.
>>> Here are some reference configurations that should work:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/armbian/build/issues/511#issuecomment-320473246
>> I know, some comments are from me but none of them worked, therefore on
>> LKML :-)
> I see, maybe you could have started there, that would have saved me a
> trip to github to find out the thread.
>
>> /boot/config-4.16.7-100.fc26.armv7hl:CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING=y
>>
>> so this can't be the issue, any further ideas?
> Yes, remove the "self" from your bridge vlan commands, I don't see that
> being necessary.

Same:
[root@bpi ~]# bridge vlan add dev lan1 vid 101 pvid untagged self
RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported
[root@bpi ~]# bridge vlan add dev lan1 vid 101 pvid untagged
RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported
[root@bpi ~]# bridge vlan add dev lan1 vid 101
RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported

Any ideas how to debug further?

>
>> On my 2nd Banana Pi-R1 still on Fedora 25 with kernel
>> 4.12.8-200.fc25.armv7hl the commands still work well, but I wanted to
>> test the upgrade on another one.
>>
>> /boot/config-4.12.8-200.fc25.armv7hl:CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING=y
> Is using an upstream or compiled by yourself kernel an option at all? I
> have no clue what is in a distribution kernel.

Typically the Fedora kernels work fine (long term experience since 
Fedora Core 1 from 2004 :-) ). I had some custom patches in there in the 
past for external RTC and b53_switch.kernel_4.5+.patch, but otherwise no 
topics. Therefore with upstream DSA support that should be fine then.


Infos can be found here:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1078638


Ciao,

Gerhard