From: Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org> To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>, Jeremie Galarneau <jgalar@efficios.com>, gbastien+lttng <gbastien+lttng@versatic.net>, diamon-discuss@linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH CTF 1/3] Clarify that unlisted enum values are implementation-defined Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:40:18 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview] Message-ID: <1031751564.72894.1588099218629.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200423205226.496-2-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> > To: "gbastien+lttng" <gbastien+lttng@versatic.net>, "Matthew Khouzam" <matthew.khouzam@ericsson.com>, > diamon-discuss@linuxfoundation.org, pproulx@efficios.com, "Jeremie Galarneau" <jgalar@efficios.com> > Cc: "lttng-dev" <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>, "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> > Sent: Thursday, 23 April, 2020 16:52:24 > Subject: [RFC PATCH CTF 1/3] Clarify that unlisted enum values are implementation-defined > From: Geneviève Bastien <gbastien+lttng@versatic.net> > > Signed-off-by: Geneviève Bastien <gbastien+lttng@versatic.net> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> > --- > common-trace-format-specification.md | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/common-trace-format-specification.md > b/common-trace-format-specification.md > index fd49e59..f5fea51 100644 > --- a/common-trace-format-specification.md > +++ b/common-trace-format-specification.md > @@ -464,6 +464,9 @@ enum { > } > ~~~ > > +The mappings in the enumeration type do not have to be exhaustive. > +Unlisted values are implementation defined. > + Why not just: An enumeration field can have an integral value which its type does not map to a string. ? Phil > ### 4.2 Compound types > > Compound are aggregation of type declarations. Compound types include > -- > 2.11.0 _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org> To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>, Jeremie Galarneau <jgalar@efficios.com>, gbastien+lttng <gbastien+lttng@versatic.net>, diamon-discuss@linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] [RFC PATCH CTF 1/3] Clarify that unlisted enum values are implementation-defined Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:40:18 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview] Message-ID: <1031751564.72894.1588099218629.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw) Message-ID: <20200428184018.tHOKo3SzA2vJarxqFmXlVFdForsJcSMxqCb4N7gZrtQ@z> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200423205226.496-2-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> > To: "gbastien+lttng" <gbastien+lttng@versatic.net>, "Matthew Khouzam" <matthew.khouzam@ericsson.com>, > diamon-discuss@linuxfoundation.org, pproulx@efficios.com, "Jeremie Galarneau" <jgalar@efficios.com> > Cc: "lttng-dev" <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>, "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> > Sent: Thursday, 23 April, 2020 16:52:24 > Subject: [RFC PATCH CTF 1/3] Clarify that unlisted enum values are implementation-defined > From: Geneviève Bastien <gbastien+lttng@versatic.net> > > Signed-off-by: Geneviève Bastien <gbastien+lttng@versatic.net> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> > --- > common-trace-format-specification.md | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/common-trace-format-specification.md > b/common-trace-format-specification.md > index fd49e59..f5fea51 100644 > --- a/common-trace-format-specification.md > +++ b/common-trace-format-specification.md > @@ -464,6 +464,9 @@ enum { > } > ~~~ > > +The mappings in the enumeration type do not have to be exhaustive. > +Unlisted values are implementation defined. > + Why not just: An enumeration field can have an integral value which its type does not map to a string. ? Phil > ### 4.2 Compound types > > Compound are aggregation of type declarations. Compound types include > -- > 2.11.0 _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-28 18:40 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-04-23 20:52 [RFC PATCH CTF 0/3] Common Trace Format Updates (upcoming 1.8.3) Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev 2020-04-23 20:52 ` [RFC PATCH CTF 1/3] Clarify that unlisted enum values are implementation-defined Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev 2020-04-23 22:51 ` Jérémie Galarneau via lttng-dev 2020-04-24 14:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev 2020-04-24 14:05 ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev 2020-04-28 18:40 ` Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev [this message] 2020-04-28 18:40 ` Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev 2020-04-28 18:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev 2020-04-28 18:51 ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev 2020-04-29 12:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev 2020-04-29 12:08 ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev 2020-04-29 16:50 ` Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev 2020-04-29 16:50 ` [lttng-dev] " Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev 2020-04-23 20:52 ` [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev 2020-04-28 18:42 ` Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev 2020-04-28 18:42 ` [lttng-dev] " Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev 2020-04-28 18:54 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev 2020-04-28 18:54 ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev 2020-04-23 20:52 ` [RFC PATCH CTF 3/3] Clarify that timestamp begin/end need to be complete clock values Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1031751564.72894.1588099218629.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \ --to=lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org \ --cc=diamon-discuss@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=gbastien+lttng@versatic.net \ --cc=jgalar@efficios.com \ --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \ --cc=pproulx@efficios.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).