netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, oss-drivers@netronome.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, parav@mellanox.com, jgg@mellanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/8] devlink: allow subports on devlink PCI ports
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 17:20:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190301162023.GJ2314@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190301080401.1b860467@cakuba.netronome.com>

Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 05:04:01PM CET, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com wrote:
>On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 08:25:57 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >> I think it would be beneficial to have the switchid shown for devlink
>> >> ports too. Then it is clean that the devlink ports with the same
>> >> switchid belong to the same switch, and other ports under the same
>> >> devlink instance (like PF itself) is separate, but still under the same
>> >> ASIC.  
>> >
>> >Sure, you mean in terms of UI - user space can do a link dump or get
>> >that from sysfs, right?  
>> 
>> I thinking about moving it to devlink. I'll work on it more today.
>
>At the kernel level?  Are we sure this is appropriate?  I'd think
>switchid is in essence a forwarding attribute, so it belongs with
>netdevs, no?

It's an id which identifies ports which belong to the same switch.
Internally in kernel it is used for forwarding purposes. But it is
exposed to user too. I believe it is a nice way to see which devlink
ports belong to switch and which not. Please see the RFC I send today.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-01 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-26 18:24 [PATCH net-next 0/8] devlink: add PF and VF port flavours Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-26 18:24 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] nfp: split devlink port init from registration Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-26 18:24 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] devlink: add PF and VF port flavours Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-27 12:16   ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-04  4:59     ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-04  7:30       ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-20 17:29         ` Abodunrin, Akeem G
2019-03-21 12:26           ` Jiri Pirko
2019-02-27 12:23   ` Jiri Pirko
2019-02-27 12:41     ` Jiri Pirko
2019-02-27 17:23       ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-27 20:17         ` Jiri Pirko
2019-02-27 22:42           ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-28  8:44             ` Jiri Pirko
2019-02-28 16:08               ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-28 16:24             ` David Ahern
2019-02-26 18:24 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] nfp: register devlink ports of all reprs Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-26 18:24 ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] devlink: allow subports on devlink PCI ports Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-27 12:37   ` Jiri Pirko
2019-02-27 18:30     ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-28  8:56       ` Jiri Pirko
2019-02-28 13:32         ` Jiri Pirko
2019-02-28 16:24         ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-01  7:25           ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-01 16:04             ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-01 16:20               ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2019-03-04 16:15       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-03-05  1:03         ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-05  1:30           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-03-05  2:11             ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-05 22:11               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-03-04  5:00     ` Parav Pandit
2019-02-26 18:24 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] nfp: switch to devlink_port_get_phys_port_name() Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-26 18:24 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] devlink: introduce port's peer netdevs Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-27 13:08   ` Jiri Pirko
2019-02-27 18:47     ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-28  9:00       ` Jiri Pirko
2019-02-28 16:36         ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-01  7:37           ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-01 16:05             ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-04  5:07     ` Parav Pandit
2019-02-26 18:24 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] nfp: expose PF " Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-26 18:24 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] devlink: fix kdoc Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-27 13:13   ` Jiri Pirko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190301162023.GJ2314@nanopsycho \
    --to=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oss-drivers@netronome.com \
    --cc=parav@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).