netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"oss-drivers@netronome.com" <oss-drivers@netronome.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 4/8] devlink: allow subports on devlink PCI ports
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 05:00:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <VI1PR0501MB2271B330D8B12CECE9CBB4D8D1710@VI1PR0501MB2271.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190227123753.GB2240@nanopsycho>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 6:38 AM
> To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
> Cc: davem@davemloft.net; oss-drivers@netronome.com;
> netdev@vger.kernel.org; Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>; Jason
> Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/8] devlink: allow subports on devlink PCI
> ports
> 
> Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 07:24:32PM CET, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com wrote:
> >PCI endpoint corresponds to a PCI device, but such device can have one
> >more more logical device ports associated with it.
> >We need a way to distinguish those. Add a PCI subport in the dumps and
> >print the info in phys_port_name appropriately.
> >
> >This is not equivalent to port splitting, there is no split group. It's
> >just a way of representing multiple netdevs on a single PCI function.
> >
> >Note that the quality of being multiport pertains only to the PCI
> >function itself. A PF having multiple netdevs does not mean that its
> >VFs will also have multiple, or that VFs are associated with any
> >particular port of a multiport VF.
> >
> 
> We've been discussing the problem of subport (we call it "subfunction"
> or "SF") for some time internally. Turned out, this is probably harder task to
> model. Please prove me wrong.
> 
> The nature of VF makes it a logically separate entity. It has a separate PCI
> address, it should therefore have a separate devlink instance.
> You can pass it through to VM, then the same devlink instance should be
> created inside the VM and disappear from the host.
> 
> SF (or subport) feels similar to that. Basically it is exactly the same thing as
> VF, only does reside under PF PCI function.
> 
> That is why I think, for sake of consistency, it should have a separate devlink
> entity as well. The problem is correct sysfs modelling and devlink handle
> derived from that. Parav is working on a simple soft bus for this purpose
> called "subbus". There is a RFC floating around on Mellanox internal mailing
> list, looks like it is time to send it upstream.
> 
> Then each PF driver which have SFs would register subbus devices according
> to SFs/subports and they would be properly handled by bus probe, devlink
> and devlink port and netdev instances created.
> 
> Ccing Parav and Jason.

Thanks Jiri for the heads up. I sent the RFC in thread [1].

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/1/19



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-04  5:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-26 18:24 [PATCH net-next 0/8] devlink: add PF and VF port flavours Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-26 18:24 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] nfp: split devlink port init from registration Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-26 18:24 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] devlink: add PF and VF port flavours Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-27 12:16   ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-04  4:59     ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-04  7:30       ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-20 17:29         ` Abodunrin, Akeem G
2019-03-21 12:26           ` Jiri Pirko
2019-02-27 12:23   ` Jiri Pirko
2019-02-27 12:41     ` Jiri Pirko
2019-02-27 17:23       ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-27 20:17         ` Jiri Pirko
2019-02-27 22:42           ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-28  8:44             ` Jiri Pirko
2019-02-28 16:08               ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-28 16:24             ` David Ahern
2019-02-26 18:24 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] nfp: register devlink ports of all reprs Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-26 18:24 ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] devlink: allow subports on devlink PCI ports Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-27 12:37   ` Jiri Pirko
2019-02-27 18:30     ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-28  8:56       ` Jiri Pirko
2019-02-28 13:32         ` Jiri Pirko
2019-02-28 16:24         ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-01  7:25           ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-01 16:04             ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-01 16:20               ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-04 16:15       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-03-05  1:03         ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-05  1:30           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-03-05  2:11             ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-05 22:11               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-03-04  5:00     ` Parav Pandit [this message]
2019-02-26 18:24 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] nfp: switch to devlink_port_get_phys_port_name() Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-26 18:24 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] devlink: introduce port's peer netdevs Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-27 13:08   ` Jiri Pirko
2019-02-27 18:47     ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-28  9:00       ` Jiri Pirko
2019-02-28 16:36         ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-01  7:37           ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-01 16:05             ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-04  5:07     ` Parav Pandit
2019-02-26 18:24 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] nfp: expose PF " Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-26 18:24 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] devlink: fix kdoc Jakub Kicinski
2019-02-27 13:13   ` Jiri Pirko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=VI1PR0501MB2271B330D8B12CECE9CBB4D8D1710@VI1PR0501MB2271.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=parav@mellanox.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oss-drivers@netronome.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).