netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
To: Kristian Evensen <kristian.evensen@gmail.com>
Cc: jiri@resnulli.us, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	j.vosburgh@gmail.com, vfalico@gmail.com,
	gospo@cumulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4] rtnl/bond: don't send rtnl msg for unregistered iface
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:06:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A77422.8010305@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfDRXjM-afW=PD77KSWU3AKk3ow_zUwb5KW3c3pSYDyAuCjqQ@mail.gmail.com>

Le 13/07/2015 16:11, Kristian Evensen a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I have a quick question about this patch.
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Nicolas Dichtel
> <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>> index 837d30b5ffed..7b25f1ef3d75 100644
>> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>> @@ -2415,6 +2415,9 @@ void rtmsg_ifinfo(int type, struct net_device *dev, unsigned int change,
>>   {
>>          struct sk_buff *skb;
>>
>> +       if (dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED)
>> +               return;
>> +
>
> Is this check correct, or placed at the correct location? The reason I
> am asking is as follows. In rollback_registered_many(), dev->reg_state
> is set to NETREG_UNREGISTERING for devices that will be unregistered.
> When rtmsg_ifinfo_build_skb(RTM_DELLINK, ...) is called in the
> following loop in rollback_registered_many, this comparison will
> always be true and no DELLINK event generated.


>
> This change led to some applications I have not behaving as expected
> due to missing DELLINK when network devices are removed. I also see no
> DELLINK with ip mon link. Removing the check restores the old behavior
> (DELLINK events are generated). My machine is running 3.18.18, which
> includes this fix.
Ok, I see the problem. My patch depends on commit
395eea6ccf2b ("rtnetlink: delay RTM_DELLINK notification until after ndo_uninit()")
which has been introduced in 3.19 (this patch is not backported in 3.18).

After 3.19, rtmsg_ifinfo_build_skb() just builds a message (an skb), it never
calls rtmsg_ifinfo(). After this call, rollback_registered_many() calls
rtmsg_ifinfo_send() (which also never calls rtmsg_ifinfo()).

I will submit a patch for the 3.18.


Regards,
Nicolas

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-16  9:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-11 14:25 [PATCH net] rtnl: don't send rtnl msg for unregistered iface Nicolas Dichtel
2015-05-11 15:37 ` Jiri Pirko
2015-05-11 16:04   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-05-11 16:15     ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-05-11 17:53       ` Jiri Pirko
2015-05-11 22:15         ` Andy Gospodarek
2015-05-12  8:43         ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-05-12 15:03         ` [PATCH net v2] rtnl/bond: " Nicolas Dichtel
2015-05-12 15:06           ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-05-12 15:17             ` [PATCH net v3] " Nicolas Dichtel
2015-05-12 15:58               ` Jiri Pirko
2015-05-12 16:10                 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-05-12 16:14                   ` Jiri Pirko
2015-05-13 12:19                     ` [PATCH net v4] " Nicolas Dichtel
2015-05-13 12:24                       ` Jiri Pirko
2015-05-13 12:36                         ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-05-18  2:44                       ` David Miller
2015-07-13 14:11                       ` Kristian Evensen
2015-07-15 15:07                         ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-07-16  9:06                         ` Nicolas Dichtel [this message]
2015-07-16  9:31                           ` [PATCH linux-3.18.y] rtnl: restore notifications for deleted interfaces Nicolas Dichtel
2015-05-12 17:12                 ` [PATCH net v3] rtnl/bond: don't send rtnl msg for unregistered iface Andy Gospodarek
2015-05-13 12:01                   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-05-13 14:43                     ` Andy Gospodarek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55A77422.8010305@6wind.com \
    --to=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gospo@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=j.vosburgh@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kristian.evensen@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vfalico@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).