openbmc.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
	Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: fsi: Add optional chip-id to CFAMs
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 11:06:51 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <23be30ebb2c661ef304c78a85cff591c515ba65b.camel@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180703193017.GA23230@rob-hp-laptop>

On Tue, 2018-07-03 at 13:30 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 02:37:55PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > This represents a physical chip in the system and allows
> > a stable numbering scheme to be passed to udev for userspace
> > to recognize which chip is which.
> 
> I'm sure you're aware, stable numbers is generally not something the 
> kernel guarantees...

This has nothing to do with any kernel guarantee. Not sure what you are
mixing up here :-)

The IDs will get exposed via sysfs in order to allow udev rules to
create appropriate symlinks such as by-id or by-path as is traditional
(we haven't completely decided some of the udev side details yet)

> In the cases where we do have them, we've used aliases.

This is necessary, though Aliases may do the job too. This is the
device-tree that represents the "host" system that the BMC is managing.

We need to be able to identify using a stable numbering scheme the
processors on the FSI topology otherwise we would do "interesting"
things such as turn the fan for CPU 1 when CPU 0 gets hot :-)

(This is just a silly example, there are plenty of other reasons why we
need to understand the HW topology of a given system, including
debuggers using FSI as a backend etc...)

Traditionally POWER has used ibm,chip-id properties for the host side,
so I just did something similar here for the BMC side, but I can look
into using aliases if you prefer.

Note: I'm not sure what you have against DT provided names or IDs, this
has been a rather standard way of doing things even before we did the
FDT. For example that's what slot-names properties are for, or location
codes etc... Yes we invented that alias trick later on but it's not
necessarily the best approach (in fact I don't really like it to be
honest).

Cheers,
Ben.


> 
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi.txt | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi.txt
> > index ab516c673a4b..afb4eccab131 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi.txt
> > @@ -83,6 +83,10 @@ addresses and sizes in the slave address space:
> >      #address-cells = <1>;
> >      #size-cells = <1>;
> >  
> > +Optionally, a slave can provide a global unique chip ID which is used to
> > +identify the physical location of the chip in a system specific way
> > +
> > +    chip-id = <0>;
> >  
> >  FSI engines (devices)
> >  ---------------------
> > @@ -125,6 +129,7 @@ device tree if no extra platform information is required.
> >              reg = <0 0>;
> >              #address-cells = <1>;
> >              #size-cells = <1>;
> > +	    chip-id = <0>;
> >  
> >              /* FSI engine at 0xc00, using a single page. In this example,
> >               * it's an I2C master controller, so subnodes describe the
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-04  1:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-22  4:37 [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: fsi: Add optional chip-id to CFAMs Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-06-22  4:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] fsi: Add support for device-tree provided chip IDs Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-07-03 19:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: fsi: Add optional chip-id to CFAMs Rob Herring
2018-07-04  1:06   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2018-07-05 18:49     ` Rob Herring
2018-07-06  1:48       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-07-12  2:07         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-07-16 14:13           ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=23be30ebb2c661ef304c78a85cff591c515ba65b.camel@kernel.crashing.org \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=andrew@aj.id.au \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=joel@jms.id.au \
    --cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).