Re: [PATCH v5 2/9] vfio: tolerate migration protocol v1 uapi renames

[Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>]

On 4/12/22 18:07, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> On 4/12/22 11:50 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/4/22 20:17, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>>> The v1 uapi is deprecated and will be replaced by v2 at some point;
>>> this patch just tolerates the renaming of uapi fields to reflect
>>> v1 / deprecated status.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>>   hw/vfio/common.c    |  2 +-
>>>   hw/vfio/migration.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
>>>   2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>> I do not understand why you need this patch in this series.
>> Shouldn't it be separate?
> 
> This patch is included because of the patch 1 kernel header sync, which 
> pulls in uapi headers from kernel version 5.18-rc1 + my unmerged kernel 
> uapi changes.
> 
> This patch is unnecessary without a header sync (and in fact would break 
> QEMU compile), and is unrelated to the rest of the series -- but QEMU 
> will not compile without it once you update linux uapi headers to 
> 5.18-rc1 (or greater) due to the v1 uapi for vfio migration being 
> deprecated [1].  This means that ANY series that does a linux header 
> sync starting from here on will need something like this patch to go 
> along with the header sync (or a series that replaces v1 usage with v2?).
> 
> If this patch looks good it could be included whenever a header sync is 
> next needed, doesn't necessarily have to be with this series.
> 
> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4288200.html
> 

arrg, seems I will need it too then.
Thanks,

Pierre


-- 
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen