From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: farman@linux.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
schnelle@linux.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
richard.henderson@linaro.org, thuth@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
david@redhat.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/9] s390x/pci: enable adapter event notification for interpreted devices
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 08:10:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a171204-6d71-ee1d-d8bd-cd4eac91c3d5@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31b5f911-0e1f-ba3c-94f2-1947d5b16057@linux.ibm.com>
On 4/22/22 5:39 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>
>
> On 4/4/22 20:17, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>> Use the associated kvm ioctl operation to enable adapter event
>> notification
>> and forwarding for devices when requested. This feature will be set up
>> with or without firmware assist based upon the 'forwarding_assist'
>> setting.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 20 ++++++++++++++---
>> hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> hw/s390x/s390-pci-kvm.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h | 1 +
>> include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-kvm.h | 14 ++++++++++++
>> 5 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
>> index 9c02d31250..47918d2ce9 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
>> @@ -190,7 +190,10 @@ void s390_pci_sclp_deconfigure(SCCB *sccb)
>> rc = SCLP_RC_NO_ACTION_REQUIRED;
>> break;
>> default:
>> - if (pbdev->summary_ind) {
>> + if (pbdev->interp && (pbdev->fh & FH_MASK_ENABLE)) {
>> + /* Interpreted devices were using interrupt forwarding */
>> + s390_pci_kvm_aif_disable(pbdev);
>
> Same remark as for the kernel part.
> The VFIO device is already initialized and the action is on this device,
> Shouldn't we use the VFIO device interface instead of the KVM interface?
>
I don't necessarily disagree, but in v3 of the kernel series I was told
not to use VFIO ioctls to accomplish tasks that are unique to KVM (e.g.
AEN interpretation) and to instead use a KVM ioctl.
VFIO_DEVICE_SET_IRQS won't work as-is for reasons described in the
kernel series (e.g. we don't see any of the config space notifiers
because of instruction interpretation) -- as far as I can figure we
could add our own s390 code to QEMU to issue VFIO_DEVICE_SET_IRQS
directly for an interpreted device, but I think would also need
s390-specific changes to VFIO_DEVICE_SET_IRQS accommodate this (e.g.
maybe something like a VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_S390AEN where we can then
specify the aen information in vfio_irq_set.data -- or something else I
haven't though of yet) -- I can try to look at this some more and see if
I get a good idea.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-22 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-04 18:17 [PATCH v5 0/9] s390x/pci: zPCI interpretation support Matthew Rosato
2022-04-04 18:17 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] Update linux headers Matthew Rosato
2022-04-04 18:17 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] vfio: tolerate migration protocol v1 uapi renames Matthew Rosato
2022-04-12 15:50 ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-12 16:07 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-04-19 15:44 ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-04 18:17 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] target/s390x: add zpci-interp to cpu models Matthew Rosato
2022-05-18 8:01 ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-18 8:02 ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-18 8:05 ` Thomas Huth
2022-04-04 18:17 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] s390x/pci: add routine to get host function handle from CLP info Matthew Rosato
2022-04-19 19:15 ` Pierre Morel
2022-05-18 8:13 ` Thomas Huth
2022-04-04 18:17 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] s390x/pci: enable for load/store intepretation Matthew Rosato
2022-04-19 19:47 ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-20 15:12 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-04-22 9:27 ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-04 18:17 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] s390x/pci: don't fence interpreted devices without MSI-X Matthew Rosato
2022-04-04 18:17 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] s390x/pci: enable adapter event notification for interpreted devices Matthew Rosato
2022-04-22 9:39 ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-22 12:10 ` Matthew Rosato [this message]
2022-05-02 7:48 ` Pierre Morel
2022-05-02 9:19 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-05-02 11:30 ` Pierre Morel
2022-05-02 19:57 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-05-03 14:53 ` Pierre Morel
2022-05-04 14:20 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-04-04 18:17 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] s390x/pci: let intercept devices have separate PCI groups Matthew Rosato
2022-04-04 18:17 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] s390x/pci: reflect proper maxstbl for groups of interpreted devices Matthew Rosato
2022-04-19 19:49 ` Pierre Morel
2022-04-22 9:43 ` Pierre Morel
2022-05-06 9:03 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9a171204-6d71-ee1d-d8bd-cd4eac91c3d5@linux.ibm.com \
--to=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).