From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: fam@euphon.net, qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
mreitz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, den@openvz.org
Subject: Re: iotest failures in head [was: [PATCH v4 00/16] 64bit block-layer: part I]
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 19:29:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f3fcae0-49cb-a1fd-4878-118bcc15287a@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210202162319.GG5184@merkur.fritz.box>
02.02.2021 19:23, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 02.02.2021 um 17:13 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
>> On 2/1/21 8:56 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>
>>> I had planned to send a pull request for this series today, but ran into
>>> a snag. Without this series applied, './check -qcow2' fails 030, 185,
>>> and 297.
>>
>> 297 appears to be fixed once Kevin's pull request lands (well, that may
>> be needing a v2). 185 appears to be just a whitespace difference that
>> missed fixing in 362ef77f9 and similar:
>>
>> --- /home/eblake/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/185.out
>> +++ 185.out.bad
>> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
>> 'format': 'IMGFMT',
>> 'sync': 'full',
>> 'speed': 65536,
>> - 'x-perf': { 'max-chunk': 65536 } } }
>> + 'x-perf': {'max-chunk': 65536} } }
>>
>> 030 is a bit tougher to figure out.
>>
>> 030 fail [09:40:32] [09:40:48] 16.9s (last: 15.4s) failed,
>> exit status 1
>> --- /home/eblake/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/030.out
>> +++ 030.out.bad
>> @@ -1,5 +1,45 @@
>> -...........................
>> +WARNING:qemu.machine:qemu received signal 11; command:
>
> So some qemu process segfaulted. Did you have a look at the resulting
> coredump?
>
> Kevin
>
Note that 30 is known to crash sometimes. Look at
"[PATCH RFC 0/5] Fix accidental crash in iotest 30"
https://patchew.org/QEMU/20201120161622.1537-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com/
--
Best regards,
Vladimir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-02 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-11 18:39 [PATCH v4 00/16] 64bit block-layer: part I Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] block: refactor bdrv_check_request: add errp Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-20 22:20 ` Eric Blake
2021-01-22 19:33 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] util/iov: make qemu_iovec_init_extended() honest Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-21 21:58 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] block: fix theoretical overflow in bdrv_init_padding() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-21 22:42 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] block/io: refactor bdrv_pad_request(): move bdrv_pad_request() up Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-21 22:50 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] block/io: bdrv_pad_request(): support qemu_iovec_init_extended failure Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-21 22:53 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] block/throttle-groups: throttle_group_co_io_limits_intercept(): 64bit bytes Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] block/io: improve bdrv_check_request: check qiov too Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 14:48 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] block: use int64_t as bytes type in tracked requests Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 14:50 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] block/io: use int64_t bytes in driver wrappers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 16:02 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 16:18 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_aligned_pwritev() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 16:26 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_do_copy_on_readv() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 16:34 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_aligned_preadv() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 16:54 ` Eric Blake
2021-01-23 14:34 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_p{read, write}v_part() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy via
2021-01-22 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_p{read,write}v_part() Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in read/write wrappers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 17:22 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] block/io: use int64_t bytes in copy_range Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 18:29 ` Eric Blake
2020-12-14 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 00/16] 64bit block-layer: part I Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-09 10:13 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-02-02 2:56 ` Eric Blake
2021-02-02 6:50 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-02-02 14:59 ` Eric Blake
2021-02-02 16:13 ` iotest failures in head [was: [PATCH v4 00/16] 64bit block-layer: part I] Eric Blake
2021-02-02 16:23 ` Kevin Wolf
2021-02-02 16:29 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy [this message]
2021-02-02 18:50 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-02-02 22:47 ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-03 10:45 ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-04 15:18 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f3fcae0-49cb-a1fd-4878-118bcc15287a@virtuozzo.com \
--to=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).