qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: fam@euphon.net, kwolf@redhat.com, berto@igalia.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com,
	den@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/16] block/io: improve bdrv_check_request: check qiov too
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 08:48:03 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a7dfe73-55f6-a380-4f1e-1d114dadb543@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201211183934.169161-8-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

On 12/11/20 12:39 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Operations with qiov add more restrictions on bytes, let's cover it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
>  block/io.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
> index 4a057660f8..42e687a388 100644
> --- a/block/io.c
> +++ b/block/io.c
> @@ -898,8 +898,14 @@ static bool coroutine_fn bdrv_wait_serialising_requests(BdrvTrackedRequest *self
>      return waited;
>  }
>  
> -int bdrv_check_request(int64_t offset, int64_t bytes, Error **errp)
> +static int bdrv_check_qiov_request(int64_t offset, int64_t bytes,
> +                                   QEMUIOVector *qiov, size_t qiov_offset,
> +                                   Error **errp)
>  {
> +    /*
> +     * Check generic offset/bytes correctness
> +     */
> +
>      if (offset < 0) {
>          error_setg(errp, "offset is negative: %" PRIi64, offset);
>          return -EIO;
> @@ -929,12 +935,38 @@ int bdrv_check_request(int64_t offset, int64_t bytes, Error **errp)
>          return -EIO;
>      }
>  
> +    if (!qiov) {
> +        return 0;
> +    }

I guess this short circuit is for write zeroes...

> +
> +    /*
> +     * Check qiov and qiov_offset
> +     */
> +
> +    if (qiov_offset > qiov->size) {
> +        error_setg(errp, "qiov_offset(%zu) overflow io vector size(%zu)",
> +                   qiov_offset, qiov->size);
> +        return -EIO;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (bytes > qiov->size - qiov_offset) {
> +        error_setg(errp, "bytes(%" PRIi64 ") + qiov_offset(%zu) overflow io "
> +                   "vector size(%zu)", bytes, qiov_offset, qiov->size);
> +        return -EIO;
> +    }

Yes, worthwhile additions.

> @@ -3135,7 +3167,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_copy_range_internal(
>      if (!dst || !dst->bs || !bdrv_is_inserted(dst->bs)) {
>          return -ENOMEDIUM;
>      }
> -    ret = bdrv_check_request32(dst_offset, bytes);
> +    ret = bdrv_check_request32(dst_offset, bytes, NULL, 0);

...ah, it's also for copy_range; basically any caller that isn't using a
qiov and therefore can't overflow qiov bounds.

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org



  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-22 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-11 18:39 [PATCH v4 00/16] 64bit block-layer: part I Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] block: refactor bdrv_check_request: add errp Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-20 22:20   ` Eric Blake
2021-01-22 19:33   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] util/iov: make qemu_iovec_init_extended() honest Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-21 21:58   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] block: fix theoretical overflow in bdrv_init_padding() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-21 22:42   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] block/io: refactor bdrv_pad_request(): move bdrv_pad_request() up Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-21 22:50   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] block/io: bdrv_pad_request(): support qemu_iovec_init_extended failure Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-21 22:53   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] block/throttle-groups: throttle_group_co_io_limits_intercept(): 64bit bytes Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] block/io: improve bdrv_check_request: check qiov too Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 14:48   ` Eric Blake [this message]
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] block: use int64_t as bytes type in tracked requests Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 14:50   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] block/io: use int64_t bytes in driver wrappers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 16:02   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 16:18   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_aligned_pwritev() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 16:26   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_do_copy_on_readv() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 16:34   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_aligned_preadv() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 16:54   ` Eric Blake
2021-01-23 14:34     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_p{read, write}v_part() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy via
2021-01-22 17:00   ` [PATCH v4 14/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_p{read,write}v_part() Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] block/io: support int64_t bytes in read/write wrappers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 17:22   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-11 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] block/io: use int64_t bytes in copy_range Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-22 18:29   ` Eric Blake
2020-12-14 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 00/16] 64bit block-layer: part I Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-01-09 10:13 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-02-02  2:56 ` Eric Blake
2021-02-02  6:50   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-02-02 14:59   ` Eric Blake
2021-02-02 16:13   ` iotest failures in head [was: [PATCH v4 00/16] 64bit block-layer: part I] Eric Blake
2021-02-02 16:23     ` Kevin Wolf
2021-02-02 16:29       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-02-02 18:50         ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-02-02 22:47         ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-03 10:45           ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-04 15:18             ` Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7a7dfe73-55f6-a380-4f1e-1d114dadb543@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=berto@igalia.com \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).