qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"qemu-block@nongnu.org" <qemu-block@nongnu.org>
Cc: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
	"berto@igalia.com" <berto@igalia.com>,
	"ehabkost@redhat.com" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Denis Lunev <den@virtuozzo.com>,
	"mtosatti@redhat.com" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	"mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"armbru@redhat.com" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	"rth@twiddle.net" <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] i386/kvm: initialize struct at full before ioctl call
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 14:28:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bdbee2e0-62a7-8906-8076-408922511146@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <08958a7e-1952-caf7-ab45-2fd503db418c@virtuozzo.com>



On 31.07.19 14:04, Andrey Shinkevich wrote:
> On 31/07/2019 10:24, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 30.07.19 21:20, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 30/07/19 18:01, Andrey Shinkevich wrote:
>>>> Not the whole structure is initialized before passing it to the KVM.
>>>> Reduce the number of Valgrind reports.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>
>>>
>>> Christian, is this the right fix?  It's not expensive so it wouldn't be
>>> an issue, just checking if there's any better alternative.
>>
>> I think all of these variants are valid with pros and cons
>> 1. teach valgrind about this:
>> Add to coregrind/m_syswrap/syswrap-linux.c (and the relevant header files)
>> knowledge about which parts are actually touched.
>> 2. use designated initializers
>> 3. use memset
>> 3. use a valgrind callback VG_USERREQ__MAKE_MEM_DEFINED to tell that this memory is defined
>>
> 
> Thank you all very much for taking part in the discussion.
> Also, one may use the Valgrind technology to suppress the unwanted 
> reports by adding the Valgrind specific format file valgrind.supp to the 
> QEMU project. The file content is extendable for future needs.
> All the cases we like to suppress will be recounted in that file.
> A case looks like the stack fragments. For instance, from QEMU block:
> 
> {
>     hw/block/hd-geometry.c
>     Memcheck:Cond
>     fun:guess_disk_lchs
>     fun:hd_geometry_guess
>     fun:blkconf_geometry
>     ...
>     fun:device_set_realized
>     fun:property_set_bool
>     fun:object_property_set
>     fun:object_property_set_qobject
>     fun:object_property_set_bool
> }
> 
> The number of suppressed cases are reported by the Valgrind with every 
> run: "ERROR SUMMARY: 5 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)"
> 
> Andrey

Yes, indeed that would be another variant. How performance critical are
the fixed locations? That might have an impact on what is the best solution.
From a cleanliness approach doing 1 (adding the ioctl definition to valgrind)
is certainly the most beautiful way. I did that in the past, look for example at

https://sourceware.org/git/?p=valgrind.git;a=commitdiff;h=c2baee9b7bf043702c130de0771a4df439fcf403
or 
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=valgrind.git;a=commitdiff;h=00a31dd3d1e7101b331c2c83fca6c666ba35d910

for examples. 


> 
>>>
>>> Paolo
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>   target/i386/kvm.c | 3 +++
>>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/target/i386/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm.c
>>>> index dbbb137..ed57e31 100644
>>>> --- a/target/i386/kvm.c
>>>> +++ b/target/i386/kvm.c
>>>> @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ static int kvm_get_tsc(CPUState *cs)
>>>>           return 0;
>>>>       }
>>>>   
>>>> +    memset(&msr_data, 0, sizeof(msr_data));
>>>>       msr_data.info.nmsrs = 1;
>>>>       msr_data.entries[0].index = MSR_IA32_TSC;
>>>>       env->tsc_valid = !runstate_is_running();
>>>> @@ -1706,6 +1707,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *cs)
>>>>   
>>>>       if (has_xsave) {
>>>>           env->xsave_buf = qemu_memalign(4096, sizeof(struct kvm_xsave));
>>>> +        memset(env->xsave_buf, 0, sizeof(struct kvm_xsave));
>>>>       }
>>>>   
>>>>       max_nested_state_len = kvm_max_nested_state_length();
>>>> @@ -3477,6 +3479,7 @@ static int kvm_put_debugregs(X86CPU *cpu)
>>>>           return 0;
>>>>       }
>>>>   
>>>> +    memset(&dbgregs, 0, sizeof(dbgregs));
>>>>       for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
>>>>           dbgregs.db[i] = env->dr[i];
>>>>       }
>>>> -- 
>>>> 1.8.3.1
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-31 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-30 16:01 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Reduce the number of Valgrind reports in unit tests Andrey Shinkevich
2019-07-30 16:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] test-throttle: Fix uninitialized use of burst_length Andrey Shinkevich
2019-08-13 12:19   ` Alberto Garcia
2019-07-30 16:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] tests: Fix uninitialized byte in test_visitor_in_fuzz Andrey Shinkevich
2019-07-30 16:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] i386/kvm: initialize struct at full before ioctl call Andrey Shinkevich
2019-07-30 16:44   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-07-30 17:05     ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-07-30 17:14       ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-07-30 17:47         ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-07-31  9:05       ` Christophe de Dinechin
2019-07-31 12:32         ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-31 14:10           ` Andrey Shinkevich
2019-07-30 19:22     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-30 16:46   ` Peter Maydell
2019-07-30 17:09     ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-07-30 19:20   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-31  7:24     ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-07-31 12:04       ` Andrey Shinkevich
2019-07-31 12:28         ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2019-07-31 12:43           ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-07-31 13:03             ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-07-31 14:11             ` Andrey Shinkevich
2019-08-13 12:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Reduce the number of Valgrind reports in unit tests Andrey Shinkevich
2019-08-13 12:05   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-08-13 12:08     ` Andrey Shinkevich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bdbee2e0-62a7-8906-8076-408922511146@de.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berto@igalia.com \
    --cc=den@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).