All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, a.hajda@samsung.com
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	treding@nvidia.com
Subject: [RFC v2 3/5] drm/dsi: Check for used channels
Date: Tue,  6 Oct 2015 14:54:40 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1444123482-25579-4-git-send-email-architt@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444123482-25579-1-git-send-email-architt@codeaurora.org>

We don't check whether a previously registered mipi_dsi_device under the
same host shares the same virtual channel.

Before registering, check if any of the registered devices doesn't
already have the same virtual channel.

This wasn't crucial when all the devices under a host were populated via
DT. Now that we also support creating devices manually, we could end up
in a situation where a driver tries to create a device with a virtual
channel already taken by a device populated in DT.

Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
index 46ee515..db6130a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
@@ -123,6 +123,22 @@ static const struct device_type mipi_dsi_device_type = {
 	.release = mipi_dsi_dev_release,
 };
 
+static int __dsi_check_chan_busy(struct device *dev, void *data)
+{
+	struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(dev);
+	u32 reg = *(u32 *) data;
+
+	if (dsi && dsi->channel == reg)
+		return -EBUSY;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int mipi_dsi_check_chan_busy(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, u32 reg)
+{
+	return device_for_each_child(host->dev, &reg, __dsi_check_chan_busy);
+}
+
 struct mipi_dsi_device *mipi_dsi_device_new(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
 					    struct mipi_dsi_device_info *info)
 {
@@ -150,14 +166,20 @@ struct mipi_dsi_device *mipi_dsi_device_new(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
 
 	dev_set_name(&dsi->dev, "%s.%d", dev_name(host->dev), info->reg);
 
+	r = mipi_dsi_check_chan_busy(host, info->reg);
+	if (r)
+		goto err;
+
 	r = device_register(&dsi->dev);
 	if (r) {
 		dev_err(dev, "failed to register device: %d\n", r);
-		kfree(dsi);
-		return ERR_PTR(r);
+		goto err;
 	}
 
 	return dsi;
+err:
+	kfree(dsi);
+	return ERR_PTR(r);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(mipi_dsi_device_new);
 
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, a.hajda@samsung.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch,
	treding@nvidia.com, l.stach@pengutronix.de, robh@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
	Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [RFC v2 3/5] drm/dsi: Check for used channels
Date: Tue,  6 Oct 2015 14:54:40 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1444123482-25579-4-git-send-email-architt@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444123482-25579-1-git-send-email-architt@codeaurora.org>

We don't check whether a previously registered mipi_dsi_device under the
same host shares the same virtual channel.

Before registering, check if any of the registered devices doesn't
already have the same virtual channel.

This wasn't crucial when all the devices under a host were populated via
DT. Now that we also support creating devices manually, we could end up
in a situation where a driver tries to create a device with a virtual
channel already taken by a device populated in DT.

Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
index 46ee515..db6130a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
@@ -123,6 +123,22 @@ static const struct device_type mipi_dsi_device_type = {
 	.release = mipi_dsi_dev_release,
 };
 
+static int __dsi_check_chan_busy(struct device *dev, void *data)
+{
+	struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(dev);
+	u32 reg = *(u32 *) data;
+
+	if (dsi && dsi->channel == reg)
+		return -EBUSY;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int mipi_dsi_check_chan_busy(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, u32 reg)
+{
+	return device_for_each_child(host->dev, &reg, __dsi_check_chan_busy);
+}
+
 struct mipi_dsi_device *mipi_dsi_device_new(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
 					    struct mipi_dsi_device_info *info)
 {
@@ -150,14 +166,20 @@ struct mipi_dsi_device *mipi_dsi_device_new(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
 
 	dev_set_name(&dsi->dev, "%s.%d", dev_name(host->dev), info->reg);
 
+	r = mipi_dsi_check_chan_busy(host, info->reg);
+	if (r)
+		goto err;
+
 	r = device_register(&dsi->dev);
 	if (r) {
 		dev_err(dev, "failed to register device: %d\n", r);
-		kfree(dsi);
-		return ERR_PTR(r);
+		goto err;
 	}
 
 	return dsi;
+err:
+	kfree(dsi);
+	return ERR_PTR(r);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(mipi_dsi_device_new);
 
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-06  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 144+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-30  5:24 [RFC 0/2] drm/dsi: DSI for devices with different control bus Archit Taneja
2015-06-30  5:24 ` [RFC 1/2] drm/dsi: Create dummy DSI devices Archit Taneja
2015-06-30  5:24   ` Archit Taneja
2015-08-19  8:10   ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-08-19  8:10     ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-08-19  9:30     ` Archit Taneja
2015-06-30  5:24 ` [RFC 2/2] drm/dsi: Get DSI host by DT device node Archit Taneja
2015-06-30  5:24   ` Archit Taneja
2015-08-19  8:46   ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-08-19  8:46     ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-08-19  5:07 ` [RFC 0/2] drm/dsi: DSI for devices with different control bus Archit Taneja
2015-08-19 13:13   ` Thierry Reding
2015-08-19 13:13     ` Thierry Reding
2015-08-19 14:17     ` Lucas Stach
2015-08-19 14:34       ` Thierry Reding
2015-08-19 14:34         ` Thierry Reding
2015-08-19 14:52         ` Lucas Stach
2015-08-19 14:52           ` Lucas Stach
2015-08-19 15:02           ` Thierry Reding
2015-08-19 15:02             ` Thierry Reding
2015-08-19 15:39             ` Jani Nikula
2015-08-20  4:16             ` Archit Taneja
2015-08-20 11:48               ` Thierry Reding
2015-08-20 11:48                 ` Thierry Reding
2015-08-21  6:09                 ` Archit Taneja
2015-08-21  6:09                   ` Archit Taneja
2015-09-07 11:46                   ` Archit Taneja
2015-09-07 11:46                     ` Archit Taneja
2015-09-08 10:27                     ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-09-10  6:15                       ` Archit Taneja
2015-09-10  6:15                         ` Archit Taneja
2015-09-10  7:32                         ` Thierry Reding
2015-09-10  7:32                           ` Thierry Reding
2015-09-15 10:32                           ` Archit Taneja
2015-09-15 10:32                             ` Archit Taneja
2015-09-15 15:43                             ` Rob Herring
2015-09-17  8:56                               ` Archit Taneja
2015-09-15 10:41                           ` Archit Taneja
2015-09-15 10:41                             ` Archit Taneja
2015-10-06  9:24 ` [RFC v2 0/5] " Archit Taneja
2015-10-06  9:24   ` [RFC v2 1/5] drm/dsi: Refactor device creation Archit Taneja
2015-10-06  9:24     ` Archit Taneja
2015-10-30 11:28     ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-10-30 11:28       ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-10-06  9:24   ` [RFC v2 2/5] drm/dsi: Try to match non-DT dsi devices Archit Taneja
2015-10-06  9:24     ` Archit Taneja
2015-10-30 12:42     ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-10-30 12:42       ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-11-02  5:26       ` Archit Taneja
2015-11-02  5:26         ` Archit Taneja
2015-10-06  9:24   ` Archit Taneja [this message]
2015-10-06  9:24     ` [RFC v2 3/5] drm/dsi: Check for used channels Archit Taneja
2015-10-30 12:52     ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-11-02  5:28       ` Archit Taneja
2015-11-02  5:28         ` Archit Taneja
2015-10-06  9:24   ` [RFC v2 4/5] drm/dsi: Add routine to unregister dsi device Archit Taneja
2015-10-06  9:24     ` Archit Taneja
2015-10-30 14:21     ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-10-30 14:21       ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-11-02  6:28       ` Archit Taneja
2015-11-02 10:42         ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-11-03  7:18           ` Archit Taneja
2015-10-06  9:24   ` [RFC v2 5/5] drm/dsi: Get DSI host by DT device node Archit Taneja
2015-10-06  9:24     ` Archit Taneja
2015-10-06 10:00     ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-06 10:00       ` kbuild test robot
2015-11-02 10:50     ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-11-02 10:50       ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-11-03  7:20       ` Archit Taneja
2015-11-03  7:20         ` Archit Taneja
2015-11-30 12:01   ` [PATCH v3 0/5] drm/dsi: DSI for devices with different control bus Archit Taneja
2015-11-30 12:01     ` [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/dsi: Refactor device creation Archit Taneja
2015-11-30 12:01       ` Archit Taneja
2015-11-30 12:01     ` [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/dsi: Try to match non-DT dsi devices Archit Taneja
2015-11-30 12:01       ` Archit Taneja
2015-11-30 12:45       ` kbuild test robot
2015-11-30 12:45         ` kbuild test robot
2015-12-07  5:29         ` Archit Taneja
2015-12-07  8:45           ` Jani Nikula
2015-12-07  8:59             ` Archit Taneja
2015-12-07  8:59               ` Archit Taneja
2015-12-07  9:10               ` Jani Nikula
2015-12-07  9:10                 ` Jani Nikula
2015-12-07  9:18                 ` Archit Taneja
2015-12-07 10:07                   ` Jani Nikula
2015-12-07 16:55             ` Rob Clark
2015-11-30 12:01     ` [PATCH v3 3/5] drm/dsi: Check for used channels Archit Taneja
2015-11-30 12:01       ` Archit Taneja
2015-11-30 12:01     ` [PATCH v3 4/5] drm/dsi: Add routine to unregister dsi device Archit Taneja
2015-11-30 12:01       ` Archit Taneja
2015-11-30 12:34       ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-11-30 12:34         ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-11-30 12:01     ` [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/dsi: Get DSI host by DT device node Archit Taneja
2015-11-30 12:01       ` Archit Taneja
2015-12-10 12:41     ` [PATCH v4 0/6] drm/dsi: DSI for devices with different control bus Archit Taneja
2015-12-10 12:41       ` [PATCH v4 1/6] drm/dsi: check for CONFIG_OF when defining of_mipi_dsi_device_add Archit Taneja
2015-12-10 12:41         ` Archit Taneja
2016-01-21 15:31         ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-21 15:31           ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-26 14:59           ` Archit Taneja
2016-01-26 14:59             ` Archit Taneja
2015-12-10 12:41       ` [PATCH v4 2/6] drm/dsi: Refactor device creation Archit Taneja
2016-01-21 15:46         ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-21 15:46           ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-26 17:05           ` Archit Taneja
2016-01-26 17:05             ` Archit Taneja
2015-12-10 12:41       ` [PATCH v4 3/6] drm/dsi: Try to match non-DT dsi devices Archit Taneja
2015-12-10 12:41         ` Archit Taneja
2016-01-21 16:05         ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-21 16:05           ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-26 18:04           ` Archit Taneja
2016-01-26 18:04             ` Archit Taneja
2015-12-10 12:41       ` [PATCH v4 4/6] drm/dsi: Check for used channels Archit Taneja
2015-12-10 12:41         ` Archit Taneja
2016-01-21 16:11         ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-21 16:11           ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-27  5:16           ` Archit Taneja
2016-01-27  5:16             ` Archit Taneja
2015-12-10 12:41       ` [PATCH v4 5/6] drm/dsi: Add routine to unregister dsi device Archit Taneja
2015-12-10 12:41         ` Archit Taneja
2016-01-21 16:12         ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-21 16:12           ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-27  5:20           ` Archit Taneja
2015-12-10 12:41       ` [PATCH v4 6/6] drm/dsi: Get DSI host by DT device node Archit Taneja
2015-12-10 12:41         ` Archit Taneja
2016-01-21 16:16         ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-21 16:16           ` Thierry Reding
2016-01-27  5:21           ` Archit Taneja
2016-01-27  5:21             ` Archit Taneja
2016-01-05  5:29       ` [PATCH v4 0/6] drm/dsi: DSI for devices with different control bus Archit Taneja
2016-02-12  9:18       ` [PATCH v5 0/5] " Archit Taneja
2016-02-12  9:18         ` Archit Taneja
2016-02-12  9:18         ` [PATCH v5 1/5] drm/dsi: check for CONFIG_OF when defining of_mipi_dsi_device_add Archit Taneja
2016-02-12  9:18           ` Archit Taneja
2016-02-12  9:18         ` [PATCH v5 2/5] drm/dsi: Use mipi_dsi_device_register_full for DSI device creation Archit Taneja
2016-02-12  9:18           ` Archit Taneja
2016-02-12  9:18         ` [PATCH v5 3/5] drm/dsi: Try to match non-DT DSI devices Archit Taneja
2016-02-12  9:18           ` Archit Taneja
2016-02-12  9:18         ` [PATCH v5 4/5] drm/dsi: Add routine to unregister a DSI device Archit Taneja
2016-02-12  9:18           ` Archit Taneja
2016-02-12  9:18         ` [PATCH v5 5/5] drm/dsi: Get DSI host by DT device node Archit Taneja
2016-02-12  9:18           ` Archit Taneja
2016-03-02 16:05         ` [PATCH v5 0/5] drm/dsi: DSI for devices with different control bus Thierry Reding
2016-03-02 16:05           ` Thierry Reding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1444123482-25579-4-git-send-email-architt@codeaurora.org \
    --to=architt@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.