From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, rob.herring@linaro.org, nm@ti.com Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, arnd.bergmann@linaro.org, broonie@kernel.org, mike.turquette@linaro.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org, Sudeep.Holla@arm.com, viswanath.puttagunta@linaro.org, l.stach@pengutronix.de, thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ta.omasab@gmail.com, kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com, khilman@linaro.org, santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Subject: [PATCH 01/10] opp: Relocate few routines Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:27:27 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <f0b36d8d92b406a3a51f32d5fcca10a73529d637.1434369079.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <cover.1434369079.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <cover.1434369079.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> In order to prepare for the later commits, this relocates few routines towards the top as they will be used earlier in the code. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- drivers/base/power/opp.c | 277 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 139 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c index 677fb2843553..8c3fd57975fb 100644 --- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c @@ -438,6 +438,102 @@ static struct device_opp *_add_device_opp(struct device *dev) } /** + * _kfree_device_rcu() - Free device_opp RCU handler + * @head: RCU head + */ +static void _kfree_device_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) +{ + struct device_opp *device_opp = container_of(head, struct device_opp, rcu_head); + + kfree_rcu(device_opp, rcu_head); +} + +/** + * _kfree_opp_rcu() - Free OPP RCU handler + * @head: RCU head + */ +static void _kfree_opp_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) +{ + struct dev_pm_opp *opp = container_of(head, struct dev_pm_opp, rcu_head); + + kfree_rcu(opp, rcu_head); +} + +/** + * _opp_remove() - Remove an OPP from a table definition + * @dev_opp: points back to the device_opp struct this opp belongs to + * @opp: pointer to the OPP to remove + * + * This function removes an opp definition from the opp list. + * + * Locking: The internal device_opp and opp structures are RCU protected. + * It is assumed that the caller holds required mutex for an RCU updater + * strategy. + */ +static void _opp_remove(struct device_opp *dev_opp, + struct dev_pm_opp *opp) +{ + /* + * Notify the changes in the availability of the operable + * frequency/voltage list. + */ + srcu_notifier_call_chain(&dev_opp->srcu_head, OPP_EVENT_REMOVE, opp); + list_del_rcu(&opp->node); + call_srcu(&dev_opp->srcu_head.srcu, &opp->rcu_head, _kfree_opp_rcu); + + if (list_empty(&dev_opp->opp_list)) { + list_del_rcu(&dev_opp->node); + call_srcu(&dev_opp->srcu_head.srcu, &dev_opp->rcu_head, + _kfree_device_rcu); + } +} + +/** + * dev_pm_opp_remove() - Remove an OPP from OPP list + * @dev: device for which we do this operation + * @freq: OPP to remove with matching 'freq' + * + * This function removes an opp from the opp list. + * + * Locking: The internal device_opp and opp structures are RCU protected. + * Hence this function internally uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks + * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure + * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where + * mutex cannot be locked. + */ +void dev_pm_opp_remove(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq) +{ + struct dev_pm_opp *opp; + struct device_opp *dev_opp; + bool found = false; + + /* Hold our list modification lock here */ + mutex_lock(&dev_opp_list_lock); + + dev_opp = _find_device_opp(dev); + if (IS_ERR(dev_opp)) + goto unlock; + + list_for_each_entry(opp, &dev_opp->opp_list, node) { + if (opp->rate == freq) { + found = true; + break; + } + } + + if (!found) { + dev_warn(dev, "%s: Couldn't find OPP with freq: %lu\n", + __func__, freq); + goto unlock; + } + + _opp_remove(dev_opp, opp); +unlock: + mutex_unlock(&dev_opp_list_lock); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_remove); + +/** * _opp_add_dynamic() - Allocate a dynamic OPP. * @dev: device for which we do this operation * @freq: Frequency in Hz for this OPP @@ -570,102 +666,6 @@ int dev_pm_opp_add(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, unsigned long u_volt) EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_add); /** - * _kfree_opp_rcu() - Free OPP RCU handler - * @head: RCU head - */ -static void _kfree_opp_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) -{ - struct dev_pm_opp *opp = container_of(head, struct dev_pm_opp, rcu_head); - - kfree_rcu(opp, rcu_head); -} - -/** - * _kfree_device_rcu() - Free device_opp RCU handler - * @head: RCU head - */ -static void _kfree_device_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) -{ - struct device_opp *device_opp = container_of(head, struct device_opp, rcu_head); - - kfree_rcu(device_opp, rcu_head); -} - -/** - * _opp_remove() - Remove an OPP from a table definition - * @dev_opp: points back to the device_opp struct this opp belongs to - * @opp: pointer to the OPP to remove - * - * This function removes an opp definition from the opp list. - * - * Locking: The internal device_opp and opp structures are RCU protected. - * It is assumed that the caller holds required mutex for an RCU updater - * strategy. - */ -static void _opp_remove(struct device_opp *dev_opp, - struct dev_pm_opp *opp) -{ - /* - * Notify the changes in the availability of the operable - * frequency/voltage list. - */ - srcu_notifier_call_chain(&dev_opp->srcu_head, OPP_EVENT_REMOVE, opp); - list_del_rcu(&opp->node); - call_srcu(&dev_opp->srcu_head.srcu, &opp->rcu_head, _kfree_opp_rcu); - - if (list_empty(&dev_opp->opp_list)) { - list_del_rcu(&dev_opp->node); - call_srcu(&dev_opp->srcu_head.srcu, &dev_opp->rcu_head, - _kfree_device_rcu); - } -} - -/** - * dev_pm_opp_remove() - Remove an OPP from OPP list - * @dev: device for which we do this operation - * @freq: OPP to remove with matching 'freq' - * - * This function removes an opp from the opp list. - * - * Locking: The internal device_opp and opp structures are RCU protected. - * Hence this function internally uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks - * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure - * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where - * mutex cannot be locked. - */ -void dev_pm_opp_remove(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq) -{ - struct dev_pm_opp *opp; - struct device_opp *dev_opp; - bool found = false; - - /* Hold our list modification lock here */ - mutex_lock(&dev_opp_list_lock); - - dev_opp = _find_device_opp(dev); - if (IS_ERR(dev_opp)) - goto unlock; - - list_for_each_entry(opp, &dev_opp->opp_list, node) { - if (opp->rate == freq) { - found = true; - break; - } - } - - if (!found) { - dev_warn(dev, "%s: Couldn't find OPP with freq: %lu\n", - __func__, freq); - goto unlock; - } - - _opp_remove(dev_opp, opp); -unlock: - mutex_unlock(&dev_opp_list_lock); -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_remove); - -/** * _opp_set_availability() - helper to set the availability of an opp * @dev: device for which we do this operation * @freq: OPP frequency to modify availability @@ -825,6 +825,49 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_get_notifier); #ifdef CONFIG_OF /** + * of_free_opp_table() - Free OPP table entries created from static DT entries + * @dev: device pointer used to lookup device OPPs. + * + * Free OPPs created using static entries present in DT. + * + * Locking: The internal device_opp and opp structures are RCU protected. + * Hence this function indirectly uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks + * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure + * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where + * mutex cannot be locked. + */ +void of_free_opp_table(struct device *dev) +{ + struct device_opp *dev_opp; + struct dev_pm_opp *opp, *tmp; + + /* Check for existing list for 'dev' */ + dev_opp = _find_device_opp(dev); + if (IS_ERR(dev_opp)) { + int error = PTR_ERR(dev_opp); + + if (error != -ENODEV) + WARN(1, "%s: dev_opp: %d\n", + IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev) ? + "Invalid device" : dev_name(dev), + error); + return; + } + + /* Hold our list modification lock here */ + mutex_lock(&dev_opp_list_lock); + + /* Free static OPPs */ + list_for_each_entry_safe(opp, tmp, &dev_opp->opp_list, node) { + if (!opp->dynamic) + _opp_remove(dev_opp, opp); + } + + mutex_unlock(&dev_opp_list_lock); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_free_opp_table); + +/** * of_init_opp_table() - Initialize opp table from device tree * @dev: device pointer used to lookup device OPPs. * @@ -882,46 +925,4 @@ int of_init_opp_table(struct device *dev) return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_init_opp_table); - -/** - * of_free_opp_table() - Free OPP table entries created from static DT entries - * @dev: device pointer used to lookup device OPPs. - * - * Free OPPs created using static entries present in DT. - * - * Locking: The internal device_opp and opp structures are RCU protected. - * Hence this function indirectly uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks - * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure - * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where - * mutex cannot be locked. - */ -void of_free_opp_table(struct device *dev) -{ - struct device_opp *dev_opp; - struct dev_pm_opp *opp, *tmp; - - /* Check for existing list for 'dev' */ - dev_opp = _find_device_opp(dev); - if (IS_ERR(dev_opp)) { - int error = PTR_ERR(dev_opp); - if (error != -ENODEV) - WARN(1, "%s: dev_opp: %d\n", - IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev) ? - "Invalid device" : dev_name(dev), - error); - return; - } - - /* Hold our list modification lock here */ - mutex_lock(&dev_opp_list_lock); - - /* Free static OPPs */ - list_for_each_entry_safe(opp, tmp, &dev_opp->opp_list, node) { - if (!opp->dynamic) - _opp_remove(dev_opp, opp); - } - - mutex_unlock(&dev_opp_list_lock); -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_free_opp_table); #endif -- 2.4.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 01/10] opp: Relocate few routines Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:27:27 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <f0b36d8d92b406a3a51f32d5fcca10a73529d637.1434369079.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <cover.1434369079.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> In order to prepare for the later commits, this relocates few routines towards the top as they will be used earlier in the code. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- drivers/base/power/opp.c | 277 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 139 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c index 677fb2843553..8c3fd57975fb 100644 --- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c @@ -438,6 +438,102 @@ static struct device_opp *_add_device_opp(struct device *dev) } /** + * _kfree_device_rcu() - Free device_opp RCU handler + * @head: RCU head + */ +static void _kfree_device_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) +{ + struct device_opp *device_opp = container_of(head, struct device_opp, rcu_head); + + kfree_rcu(device_opp, rcu_head); +} + +/** + * _kfree_opp_rcu() - Free OPP RCU handler + * @head: RCU head + */ +static void _kfree_opp_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) +{ + struct dev_pm_opp *opp = container_of(head, struct dev_pm_opp, rcu_head); + + kfree_rcu(opp, rcu_head); +} + +/** + * _opp_remove() - Remove an OPP from a table definition + * @dev_opp: points back to the device_opp struct this opp belongs to + * @opp: pointer to the OPP to remove + * + * This function removes an opp definition from the opp list. + * + * Locking: The internal device_opp and opp structures are RCU protected. + * It is assumed that the caller holds required mutex for an RCU updater + * strategy. + */ +static void _opp_remove(struct device_opp *dev_opp, + struct dev_pm_opp *opp) +{ + /* + * Notify the changes in the availability of the operable + * frequency/voltage list. + */ + srcu_notifier_call_chain(&dev_opp->srcu_head, OPP_EVENT_REMOVE, opp); + list_del_rcu(&opp->node); + call_srcu(&dev_opp->srcu_head.srcu, &opp->rcu_head, _kfree_opp_rcu); + + if (list_empty(&dev_opp->opp_list)) { + list_del_rcu(&dev_opp->node); + call_srcu(&dev_opp->srcu_head.srcu, &dev_opp->rcu_head, + _kfree_device_rcu); + } +} + +/** + * dev_pm_opp_remove() - Remove an OPP from OPP list + * @dev: device for which we do this operation + * @freq: OPP to remove with matching 'freq' + * + * This function removes an opp from the opp list. + * + * Locking: The internal device_opp and opp structures are RCU protected. + * Hence this function internally uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks + * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure + * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where + * mutex cannot be locked. + */ +void dev_pm_opp_remove(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq) +{ + struct dev_pm_opp *opp; + struct device_opp *dev_opp; + bool found = false; + + /* Hold our list modification lock here */ + mutex_lock(&dev_opp_list_lock); + + dev_opp = _find_device_opp(dev); + if (IS_ERR(dev_opp)) + goto unlock; + + list_for_each_entry(opp, &dev_opp->opp_list, node) { + if (opp->rate == freq) { + found = true; + break; + } + } + + if (!found) { + dev_warn(dev, "%s: Couldn't find OPP with freq: %lu\n", + __func__, freq); + goto unlock; + } + + _opp_remove(dev_opp, opp); +unlock: + mutex_unlock(&dev_opp_list_lock); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_remove); + +/** * _opp_add_dynamic() - Allocate a dynamic OPP. * @dev: device for which we do this operation * @freq: Frequency in Hz for this OPP @@ -570,102 +666,6 @@ int dev_pm_opp_add(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, unsigned long u_volt) EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_add); /** - * _kfree_opp_rcu() - Free OPP RCU handler - * @head: RCU head - */ -static void _kfree_opp_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) -{ - struct dev_pm_opp *opp = container_of(head, struct dev_pm_opp, rcu_head); - - kfree_rcu(opp, rcu_head); -} - -/** - * _kfree_device_rcu() - Free device_opp RCU handler - * @head: RCU head - */ -static void _kfree_device_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) -{ - struct device_opp *device_opp = container_of(head, struct device_opp, rcu_head); - - kfree_rcu(device_opp, rcu_head); -} - -/** - * _opp_remove() - Remove an OPP from a table definition - * @dev_opp: points back to the device_opp struct this opp belongs to - * @opp: pointer to the OPP to remove - * - * This function removes an opp definition from the opp list. - * - * Locking: The internal device_opp and opp structures are RCU protected. - * It is assumed that the caller holds required mutex for an RCU updater - * strategy. - */ -static void _opp_remove(struct device_opp *dev_opp, - struct dev_pm_opp *opp) -{ - /* - * Notify the changes in the availability of the operable - * frequency/voltage list. - */ - srcu_notifier_call_chain(&dev_opp->srcu_head, OPP_EVENT_REMOVE, opp); - list_del_rcu(&opp->node); - call_srcu(&dev_opp->srcu_head.srcu, &opp->rcu_head, _kfree_opp_rcu); - - if (list_empty(&dev_opp->opp_list)) { - list_del_rcu(&dev_opp->node); - call_srcu(&dev_opp->srcu_head.srcu, &dev_opp->rcu_head, - _kfree_device_rcu); - } -} - -/** - * dev_pm_opp_remove() - Remove an OPP from OPP list - * @dev: device for which we do this operation - * @freq: OPP to remove with matching 'freq' - * - * This function removes an opp from the opp list. - * - * Locking: The internal device_opp and opp structures are RCU protected. - * Hence this function internally uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks - * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure - * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where - * mutex cannot be locked. - */ -void dev_pm_opp_remove(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq) -{ - struct dev_pm_opp *opp; - struct device_opp *dev_opp; - bool found = false; - - /* Hold our list modification lock here */ - mutex_lock(&dev_opp_list_lock); - - dev_opp = _find_device_opp(dev); - if (IS_ERR(dev_opp)) - goto unlock; - - list_for_each_entry(opp, &dev_opp->opp_list, node) { - if (opp->rate == freq) { - found = true; - break; - } - } - - if (!found) { - dev_warn(dev, "%s: Couldn't find OPP with freq: %lu\n", - __func__, freq); - goto unlock; - } - - _opp_remove(dev_opp, opp); -unlock: - mutex_unlock(&dev_opp_list_lock); -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_remove); - -/** * _opp_set_availability() - helper to set the availability of an opp * @dev: device for which we do this operation * @freq: OPP frequency to modify availability @@ -825,6 +825,49 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_get_notifier); #ifdef CONFIG_OF /** + * of_free_opp_table() - Free OPP table entries created from static DT entries + * @dev: device pointer used to lookup device OPPs. + * + * Free OPPs created using static entries present in DT. + * + * Locking: The internal device_opp and opp structures are RCU protected. + * Hence this function indirectly uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks + * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure + * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where + * mutex cannot be locked. + */ +void of_free_opp_table(struct device *dev) +{ + struct device_opp *dev_opp; + struct dev_pm_opp *opp, *tmp; + + /* Check for existing list for 'dev' */ + dev_opp = _find_device_opp(dev); + if (IS_ERR(dev_opp)) { + int error = PTR_ERR(dev_opp); + + if (error != -ENODEV) + WARN(1, "%s: dev_opp: %d\n", + IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev) ? + "Invalid device" : dev_name(dev), + error); + return; + } + + /* Hold our list modification lock here */ + mutex_lock(&dev_opp_list_lock); + + /* Free static OPPs */ + list_for_each_entry_safe(opp, tmp, &dev_opp->opp_list, node) { + if (!opp->dynamic) + _opp_remove(dev_opp, opp); + } + + mutex_unlock(&dev_opp_list_lock); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_free_opp_table); + +/** * of_init_opp_table() - Initialize opp table from device tree * @dev: device pointer used to lookup device OPPs. * @@ -882,46 +925,4 @@ int of_init_opp_table(struct device *dev) return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_init_opp_table); - -/** - * of_free_opp_table() - Free OPP table entries created from static DT entries - * @dev: device pointer used to lookup device OPPs. - * - * Free OPPs created using static entries present in DT. - * - * Locking: The internal device_opp and opp structures are RCU protected. - * Hence this function indirectly uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks - * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure - * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where - * mutex cannot be locked. - */ -void of_free_opp_table(struct device *dev) -{ - struct device_opp *dev_opp; - struct dev_pm_opp *opp, *tmp; - - /* Check for existing list for 'dev' */ - dev_opp = _find_device_opp(dev); - if (IS_ERR(dev_opp)) { - int error = PTR_ERR(dev_opp); - if (error != -ENODEV) - WARN(1, "%s: dev_opp: %d\n", - IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev) ? - "Invalid device" : dev_name(dev), - error); - return; - } - - /* Hold our list modification lock here */ - mutex_lock(&dev_opp_list_lock); - - /* Free static OPPs */ - list_for_each_entry_safe(opp, tmp, &dev_opp->opp_list, node) { - if (!opp->dynamic) - _opp_remove(dev_opp, opp); - } - - mutex_unlock(&dev_opp_list_lock); -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_free_opp_table); #endif -- 2.4.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-15 11:58 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-06-15 11:57 [PATCH 00/10] OPP: Add code to support operating-points-v2 bindings Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar [this message] 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 01/10] opp: Relocate few routines Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 1:25 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 1:25 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-24 17:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-24 17:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 02/10] OPP: Create _remove_device_opp() for freeing dev_opp Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 1:25 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 1:25 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-24 17:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-24 17:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 03/10] OPP: Allocate dev_opp from _add_device_opp() Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 1:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 6:24 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 6:24 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 23:46 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 23:46 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-03 6:45 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-03 6:45 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-06 22:31 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-06 22:31 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-24 17:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-24 17:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 04/10] OPP: Break _opp_add_dynamic() into smaller functions Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-24 17:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-24 17:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 05/10] opp: Add support to parse "operating-points-v2" bindings Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 1:13 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 1:13 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 6:38 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 6:38 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 16:07 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 16:07 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-03 6:08 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-03 6:08 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-08 13:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-08 13:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 5:18 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-09 5:18 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-24 18:02 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-24 18:02 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-27 3:14 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 3:14 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 3:02 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 3:02 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-28 23:03 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-28 23:03 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-29 6:53 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-29 6:53 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-30 10:17 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-30 10:17 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 06/10] OPP: Add clock-latency-ns support Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-02 1:27 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-02 1:27 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 07/10] opp: Add OPP sharing information to OPP library Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-17 22:51 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-17 22:51 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-18 6:33 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-18 6:33 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-20 17:46 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-20 17:46 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-21 2:18 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-21 2:18 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 3:20 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-27 3:20 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 08/10] OPP: Add support for opp-suspend Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-17 19:22 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-17 19:22 ` Stephen Boyd 2015-07-18 6:32 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-18 6:32 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 09/10] opp: Add helpers for initializing CPU OPPs Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` [PATCH 10/10] cpufreq-dt: Add support for operating-points-v2 bindings Viresh Kumar 2015-06-15 11:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-09 16:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 16:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 16:44 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-09 16:44 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2015-07-15 2:59 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-15 2:59 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-06-30 16:44 ` [PATCH 00/10] OPP: Add code to support " Viresh Kumar 2015-06-30 16:44 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-17 2:36 ` Viresh Kumar 2015-07-17 2:36 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=f0b36d8d92b406a3a51f32d5fcca10a73529d637.1434369079.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \ --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \ --cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \ --cc=arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \ --cc=broonie@kernel.org \ --cc=kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com \ --cc=khilman@linaro.org \ --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \ --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mike.turquette@linaro.org \ --cc=nm@ti.com \ --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \ --cc=rob.herring@linaro.org \ --cc=santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com \ --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \ --cc=ta.omasab@gmail.com \ --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \ --cc=viswanath.puttagunta@linaro.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.