* RE: About resctrl code rebase [not found] <20210901083516.Qzs5LSr3ZkgfJT5t1XFyf14HW7R1F3jCzWy7uCnDETY@z> @ 2021-09-01 8:35 ` tan.shaopeng [not found] ` <20210901170420.65KFdDatm7mKlrWIB5eDJIuh9nXnVk_MIyBoAWWLMxs@z> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: tan.shaopeng @ 2021-09-01 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'james.morse@arm.com' Cc: 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org', 'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org', 'soc@kernel.org', 'tony.luck@intel.com', 'arnd@arndb.de', 'will@kernel.org', 'catalin.marinas@arm.com', 'olof@lixom.net', misono.tomohiro Hi, James Morse > As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's cache > control function into resctrl. Fujitsu will implement this feature base > on your rebased code. I think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 > implementation of resctrl has been merged into the x86/cache branch. > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/ > I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move > the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere. > And where is the rebase code? > In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch? I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you. I look forward to hearing from you. Best regards, Tan Shaopeng ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20210901170420.65KFdDatm7mKlrWIB5eDJIuh9nXnVk_MIyBoAWWLMxs@z>]
* Re: About resctrl code rebase [not found] ` <20210901170420.65KFdDatm7mKlrWIB5eDJIuh9nXnVk_MIyBoAWWLMxs@z> @ 2021-09-01 17:04 ` James Morse 2021-09-01 17:04 ` James Morse ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: James Morse @ 2021-09-01 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: tan.shaopeng Cc: 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org', 'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org', 'soc@kernel.org', 'tony.luck@intel.com', 'arnd@arndb.de', 'will@kernel.org', 'catalin.marinas@arm.com', 'olof@lixom.net', misono.tomohiro Hi Tan Shaopeng, On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote: >> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's cache >> control function into resctrl. >> Fujitsu will implement this feature base >> on your rebased code. I think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 >> implementation of resctrl has been merged into the x86/cache branch. >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/ I'm afraid this was only a small part of it. I've also posted the next series here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com/ and there are a couple more after that. >> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move >> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere. >> And where is the rebase code? >> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch? I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is reviewed. (please help!) I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that will happen this month. > I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you. Yes, I'm horribly behind with email! Thanks, James _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: About resctrl code rebase 2021-09-01 17:04 ` James Morse @ 2021-09-01 17:04 ` James Morse [not found] ` <20210906061907.zRxgWS4hpDpFAJYpGB0XapTra9BTfiqCe1FFEmEIhlc@z> 2021-11-24 11:17 ` tan.shaopeng 2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: James Morse @ 2021-09-01 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: tan.shaopeng Cc: 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org', 'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org', 'soc@kernel.org', 'tony.luck@intel.com', 'arnd@arndb.de', 'will@kernel.org', 'catalin.marinas@arm.com', 'olof@lixom.net', misono.tomohiro Hi Tan Shaopeng, On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote: >> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's cache >> control function into resctrl. >> Fujitsu will implement this feature base >> on your rebased code. I think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 >> implementation of resctrl has been merged into the x86/cache branch. >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/ I'm afraid this was only a small part of it. I've also posted the next series here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com/ and there are a couple more after that. >> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move >> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere. >> And where is the rebase code? >> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch? I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is reviewed. (please help!) I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that will happen this month. > I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you. Yes, I'm horribly behind with email! Thanks, James ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20210906061907.zRxgWS4hpDpFAJYpGB0XapTra9BTfiqCe1FFEmEIhlc@z>]
* RE: About resctrl code rebase [not found] ` <20210906061907.zRxgWS4hpDpFAJYpGB0XapTra9BTfiqCe1FFEmEIhlc@z> @ 2021-09-06 6:19 ` tan.shaopeng 2021-09-06 6:19 ` tan.shaopeng 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: tan.shaopeng @ 2021-09-06 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'James Morse' Cc: 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org', 'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org', 'soc@kernel.org', 'tony.luck@intel.com', 'arnd@arndb.de', 'will@kernel.org', 'catalin.marinas@arm.com', 'olof@lixom.net', misono.tomohiro Hi, James Morse Thanks for your reply. > On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote: > >> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's > >> cache control function into resctrl. > > >> Fujitsu will implement this feature base on your rebased code. I > >> think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 implementation of resctrl > >> has been merged into the x86/cache branch. > >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.ti > >> p-bot2@tip-bot2/ > > I'm afraid this was only a small part of it. > > I've also posted the next series here: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com > / > > and there are a couple more after that. I understand. > >> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move > >> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere. > >> And where is the rebase code? > >> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch? > > I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is > reviewed. > (please help!) I will check these patches. And I'm going to test these patches on machine with x86. Best regards, Tan Shaopeng > I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that > will happen this month. > > > > I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you. > > Yes, I'm horribly behind with email! _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: About resctrl code rebase 2021-09-06 6:19 ` tan.shaopeng @ 2021-09-06 6:19 ` tan.shaopeng 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: tan.shaopeng @ 2021-09-06 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'James Morse' Cc: 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org', 'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org', 'soc@kernel.org', 'tony.luck@intel.com', 'arnd@arndb.de', 'will@kernel.org', 'catalin.marinas@arm.com', 'olof@lixom.net', misono.tomohiro Hi, James Morse Thanks for your reply. > On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote: > >> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's > >> cache control function into resctrl. > > >> Fujitsu will implement this feature base on your rebased code. I > >> think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 implementation of resctrl > >> has been merged into the x86/cache branch. > >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.ti > >> p-bot2@tip-bot2/ > > I'm afraid this was only a small part of it. > > I've also posted the next series here: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com > / > > and there are a couple more after that. I understand. > >> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move > >> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere. > >> And where is the rebase code? > >> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch? > > I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is > reviewed. > (please help!) I will check these patches. And I'm going to test these patches on machine with x86. Best regards, Tan Shaopeng > I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that > will happen this month. > > > > I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you. > > Yes, I'm horribly behind with email! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: About resctrl code rebase 2021-09-01 17:04 ` James Morse 2021-09-01 17:04 ` James Morse [not found] ` <20210906061907.zRxgWS4hpDpFAJYpGB0XapTra9BTfiqCe1FFEmEIhlc@z> @ 2021-11-24 11:17 ` tan.shaopeng 2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: tan.shaopeng @ 2021-11-24 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'James Morse' Cc: 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org', 'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org', 'soc@kernel.org', 'tony.luck@intel.com', 'arnd@arndb.de', 'will@kernel.org', 'catalin.marinas@arm.com', 'olof@lixom.net', misono.tomohiro Hi James > On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote: > >> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's > >> cache control function into resctrl. > > >> Fujitsu will implement this feature base on your rebased code. I > >> think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 implementation of resctrl > >> has been merged into the x86/cache branch. > >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.ti > >> p-bot2@tip-bot2/ > > I'm afraid this was only a small part of it. > > I've also posted the next series here: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com > / > > and there are a couple more after that. When will you post patches v3? And are there any other patches after this? > >> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move > >> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere. > >> And where is the rebase code? > >> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch? > > I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is > reviewed. > (please help!) > > I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that > will happen this month. Could you tell me when you are planning to push the rebase code? Is there anything I can do for you? Best regards, Tan shaopeng ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* About resctrl code rebase @ 2021-08-19 5:14 tan.shaopeng 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: tan.shaopeng @ 2021-08-19 5:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'james.morse@arm.com' Cc: 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org', 'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org', 'soc@kernel.org', 'tony.luck@intel.com', 'arnd@arndb.de', 'will@kernel.org', 'catalin.marinas@arm.com', 'olof@lixom.net', misono.tomohiro [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 639 bytes --] Hi, James Morse As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's cache control function into resctrl. Fujitsu will implement this feature base on your rebased code. I think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 implementation of resctrl has been merged into the x86/cache branch. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/ I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere. And where is the rebase code? In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch? Best regards, Tan Shaopeng [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3895 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-11-24 11:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20210901083516.Qzs5LSr3ZkgfJT5t1XFyf14HW7R1F3jCzWy7uCnDETY@z>
2021-09-01 8:35 ` About resctrl code rebase tan.shaopeng
[not found] ` <20210901170420.65KFdDatm7mKlrWIB5eDJIuh9nXnVk_MIyBoAWWLMxs@z>
2021-09-01 17:04 ` James Morse
2021-09-01 17:04 ` James Morse
[not found] ` <20210906061907.zRxgWS4hpDpFAJYpGB0XapTra9BTfiqCe1FFEmEIhlc@z>
2021-09-06 6:19 ` tan.shaopeng
2021-09-06 6:19 ` tan.shaopeng
2021-11-24 11:17 ` tan.shaopeng
2021-08-19 5:14 tan.shaopeng
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).