From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>,
dario.faggioli@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
Quan Xu <quan.xu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/11] IOMMU/MMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to iommu_iotlb_flush{, _all} (top level ones)
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 06:32:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57597E0102000078000F3738@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5759600A.6010808@arm.com>
>>> On 09.06.16 at 14:24, <julien.grall@arm.com> wrote:
> On 09/06/16 13:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 09.06.16 at 14:08, <julien.grall@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 09/06/16 13:03, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>> On 09/06/16 12:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 09.06.16 at 13:12, <julien.grall@arm.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 08/06/16 09:58, Xu, Quan wrote:
>>>>>>> From: Quan Xu <quan.xu@intel.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Quan Xu <quan.xu@intel.com>
>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
>>>>>>> CC: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
>>>>>>> CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>>>>>>> CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> xen/arch/arm/p2m.c | 4 +++-
>>>>>>> xen/common/memory.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>>>>>>> xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c | 13 +++++++++----
>>>>>>> xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c | 5 +++--
>>>>>>> xen/include/xen/iommu.h | 5 +++--
>>>>>>> 5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c b/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
>>>>>>> index 6a19c57..65d8f1a 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
>>>>>>> @@ -1178,7 +1178,9 @@ out:
>>>>>>> if ( flush )
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> flush_tlb_domain(d);
>>>>>>> - iommu_iotlb_flush(d, sgfn, egfn - sgfn);
>>>>>>> + ret = iommu_iotlb_flush(d, sgfn, egfn - sgfn);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry for coming late in the discussion. What kind of error do you
>>>>>> expect to return with iommu_tlb_flush?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Today the ARM SMMU will always return 0 if the TLB flush timeout (see
>>>>>> arm_smmu_tlb_inv_context).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We may want in the future to return an error when it has timeout,
>>>>>> however only returning an error is not safe at all. The TLB may contain
>>>>>> entries which are invalid (because we remove the mapping earlier) and a
>>>>>> device/domain could take advantage of that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I am not sure if we should let running the guest when a flush has
>>>>>> timeout. Any thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, did you look at the rest of this series, and the other dependent
>>>>> one? Guests (other than Dom0) get crashed when a flush times out. I
>>>
>>> I missed the bit "other dependent one". Which series are you talking
>>> about? The cover letter does not give any dependent series...
>>
>> "[Patch v11 0/3] VT-d Device-TLB flush issue"
>
> To be honest, I am usually not going through x86 patch. In this case,
> the only call to domain_crash I can spot is in patch #2 which is Intel
> VTD specific.
Which is why I said you probably want this on ARM too.
> So the behavior of iommu_iotlb_flush is up to the IOMMU driver. Whilst
> the behavior of iommu_{,un}map_page are defined by the common code.
I'm certainly up for moving the logic up to the generic IOMMU layer,
if that's feasible.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-09 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-08 8:58 [PATCH v7 00/11] Check VT-d Device-TLB flush error Xu, Quan
2016-06-08 8:58 ` [PATCH v7 01/11] IOMMU: handle IOMMU mapping and unmapping failures Xu, Quan
2016-06-08 8:58 ` [PATCH v7 02/11] IOMMU/MMU: enhance the call trees of IOMMU unmapping and mapping Xu, Quan
2016-06-08 14:40 ` Jan Beulich
[not found] ` <57584D8602000078000F32D0@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
[not found] ` <421857ad-4f6b-e99c-1e81-034b19effdfb@amd.com>
2016-06-10 6:56 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-12 6:41 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-06-08 8:58 ` [PATCH v7 03/11] IOMMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to IOMMU unmapping (top level ones) Xu, Quan
2016-06-08 14:42 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-08 14:54 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-09 19:30 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2016-06-09 10:28 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-08 8:58 ` [PATCH v7 04/11] IOMMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to IOMMU mapping " Xu, Quan
2016-06-08 14:43 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-09 18:45 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2016-06-09 10:30 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-08 8:58 ` [PATCH v7 05/11] IOMMU/MMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to iommu_iotlb_flush{, _all} " Xu, Quan
2016-06-09 11:12 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-09 11:45 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-09 12:03 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-09 12:08 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-09 12:15 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-09 12:24 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-09 12:32 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2016-06-09 12:39 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-12 6:55 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-06-12 7:02 ` Xu, Quan
2016-06-12 15:35 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-09 12:14 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-12 6:46 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-06-08 8:58 ` [PATCH v7 06/11] propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to EPT update " Xu, Quan
2016-06-08 8:59 ` [PATCH v7 07/11] IOMMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to IOMMU suspending " Xu, Quan
2016-06-08 14:51 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-12 7:42 ` Xu, Quan
2016-06-13 9:25 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-09 18:58 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2016-06-12 6:58 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-06-08 8:59 ` [PATCH v7 08/11] IOMMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error (leaf ones) Xu, Quan
2016-06-08 8:59 ` [PATCH v7 09/11] vt-d: fix the IOMMU flush issue Xu, Quan
2016-06-12 7:32 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-06-12 9:27 ` Xu, Quan
2016-06-13 8:50 ` Xu, Quan
2016-06-08 8:59 ` [PATCH v7 10/11] vt-d: propagate the IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to ME phantom functions Xu, Quan
2016-06-12 7:34 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-06-08 8:59 ` [PATCH v7 11/11] vt-d: add __must_check annotation to IOMMU flush pointers and handlers Xu, Quan
2016-06-12 7:35 ` Tian, Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57597E0102000078000F3738@prv-mh.provo.novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=quan.xu@intel.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).