Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] mac80211: save transmit power envelope element and power constraint

From: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] mac80211: save transmit power envelope element and power constraint
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 16:18:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01d9e4eadbb0d87edbc026fc719858a3@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27680423e824dd67217cc6f1e62f9ac0a1af78f2.camel@sipsolutions.net>

On 2021-08-27 15:38, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-08-27 at 15:12 +0800, Wen Gong wrote:
>> On 2021-08-27 14:55, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2021-08-27 at 14:53 +0800, Wen Gong wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Well, there's an existing place in this function that uses
>> > > > cfg80211_find_ext_ie(), and various uses of ieee80211_bss_get_ie(), so
>> > > > it feels like if we're going to do the full parsing, we should switch
>> > > > all the existing "look up an element" to also use the parsed data
>> > > > instead.
>> >
>> > > ok.
>> > > so it ha 2 way to change, right?
>> > > 1.
>> > > change ieee802_11_parse_elems() to ieee80211_bss_get_ie()
>> >
>> > No why?
>> >
>> > I think we should make a first patch (that doesn't add TPE yet) that
>> > changes the function to ieee80211_parse_elems() and removes all the
>> > ieee80211_bss_get_ie() / cfg80211_find_ext_ie() calls in favour of just
>> > parsing once, and then looking at the elements there.
>> >
>> > Then your TPE patch becomes trivial since the elems are already there?
>> this patch still needed, because the lower driver need the info.
>> and this patch is save the info to "struct ieee80211_bss_conf 
>> *bss_conf"
>> and
>> pass it to lower driver.
> 
> Of course, but you don't have to deal with parsing etc. in that patch
> then.
> 
yes.
then should I use "struct ieee802_11_elems elems = {0}" or "struct 
ieee802_11_elems *elems = kzalloc(sizeof(*elems))"
in the parsing patch?

> johannes