Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/9] drm/i915: Clean up i9xx_load_luts_internal()

From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Sharma, Swati2" <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/9] drm/i915: Clean up i9xx_load_luts_internal()
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 16:46:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200306144624.GS13686@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c3a6b6b-9bf3-73a4-46de-de9c3a3a0429@intel.com>

On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 08:12:22PM +0530, Sharma, Swati2 wrote:
> 
> 
> On 03-Mar-20 11:03 PM, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > +static void i9xx_load_luts(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > +{
> > +	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> > +	const struct drm_property_blob *gamma_lut = crtc_state->hw.gamma_lut;
> > +
> > +	assert_pll_enabled(dev_priv, crtc->pipe);
> Just a query:
> Why won't we have following condition here?
> if (intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_DSI))
> 		assert_dsi_pll_enabled(dev_priv);
> or is it applicable only for i965_load_luts() and not for i9xx_load_luts()?

No DSI on these platforms. Only VLV/CHV can have it, and they use
i965_load_luts().

> 
> > +
> > +	i9xx_load_lut_8(crtc, gamma_lut);
> > +}
> > +
> The patch looks good to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
> 
> -- 
> ~Swati Sharma

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx