From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 26/35] kvm: Eliminate KVMState arguments Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:17:39 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <4D2C2033.7040807@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <4D2B67F6.5030909@codemonkey.ws> On 01/10/2011 10:11 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 01/08/2011 02:47 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> OK, but I don't want to argue about the ioeventfd API. So let's put this >> case aside. :) > > I often reply too quickly without explaining myself. Let me use > ioeventfd as an example to highlight why KVMState is a good thing. > > In real life, PIO and MMIO are never directly communicated to the > device from the processor. Instead, they go through a series of other > devices. In the case of something like an ISA device, a PIO first > goes to the chipset into the PCI complex, it will then go through a > PCI-to-ISA bridge via subtractive decoding, and then forward over the > ISA device where it will be interpreted by some device. > > The path to the chipset may be shared among different processors but > it may also be unique. The APIC is the best example as there are > historic APICs that hung directly off of the CPUs such that the same > MMIO access across different CPUs did not go to the same device. This > is why the APIC emulation in QEMU is so weird because we don't model > this behavior correctly. > > This means that a PIO operation needs to flow from a CPUState to a > DeviceState. It can then flow through to another DeviceState until > it's finally handled. > > The first problem with ioeventfd is that it's a per-VM operation. It > should be per VCPU. Just consider ioeventfd as something that hooks the system bus, not the processor-chipset link, and the problem goes away. In practice, any per-cpu io port (for SMM or power management) would need synchronous handling; an eventfd isn't a suitable way to communicate it. > > But even if this were the case, the path that a PIO operation takes > should not be impacted by ioeventfd. IOW, a device shouldn't be > allocating an eventfd() and handing it to a magical KVM call. > Instead, a device should register a callback for a particular port in > the same way it always does. *As an optimization*, we should have > another interface that says that these values are only valid for this > IO port. That would let us create eventfds and register things behind > the scenes. The semantics are different. The normal callbacks are synchronous; the vcpu is halted until the callback is serviced. For most callbacks, this is critical, not just per-cpu things like vmport (example: cirrus back switching). I agree it shouldn't be done by a kvm-specific kvm call, but instead by an API, but that API needs to be explicitly asynchronous. When we further thread qemu, we'd also need to specify which thread is to execute the callback (and the implementation would add the eventfd to the thread's fd poll list). > > That means we can handle TCG, older KVM kernels, and newer KVM kernels > without any special support in the device model. It also means that > the device models never have to worry about KVMState because there's > an entirely different piece of code that's consulting the set of > special ports and then deciding how to handle it. The result is > better, more portable code that doesn't have KVM-isms. Yes. > > If passing state around seems to be ugly, it's probably because we're > not abstracting things correctly. Removing the state and making it > implicit is the wrong solution. I agree with the general sentiment that utilizing the fact that a variable is global to make it implicit is bad from a software engineering point of view. By restricting access to variables and functions, you can enforce modularity on the code. Much like the private: specifier in C++ and other languages. > Fixing the abstraction is the right solution (or living with the > ugliness until someone else is motivated to fix it properly). And with that too, especially the parenthesized statement. We have qemu-kvm that is overly pragmatic and trie[sd] not to avoid modifying qemu as much as possible. We have the qemu.git kvm implementation that tries a perfectionist approach that failed because most of the users need the featured and tested pragmatic approach. The two mix like oil and water. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 26/35] kvm: Eliminate KVMState arguments Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:17:39 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <4D2C2033.7040807@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <4D2B67F6.5030909@codemonkey.ws> On 01/10/2011 10:11 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 01/08/2011 02:47 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> OK, but I don't want to argue about the ioeventfd API. So let's put this >> case aside. :) > > I often reply too quickly without explaining myself. Let me use > ioeventfd as an example to highlight why KVMState is a good thing. > > In real life, PIO and MMIO are never directly communicated to the > device from the processor. Instead, they go through a series of other > devices. In the case of something like an ISA device, a PIO first > goes to the chipset into the PCI complex, it will then go through a > PCI-to-ISA bridge via subtractive decoding, and then forward over the > ISA device where it will be interpreted by some device. > > The path to the chipset may be shared among different processors but > it may also be unique. The APIC is the best example as there are > historic APICs that hung directly off of the CPUs such that the same > MMIO access across different CPUs did not go to the same device. This > is why the APIC emulation in QEMU is so weird because we don't model > this behavior correctly. > > This means that a PIO operation needs to flow from a CPUState to a > DeviceState. It can then flow through to another DeviceState until > it's finally handled. > > The first problem with ioeventfd is that it's a per-VM operation. It > should be per VCPU. Just consider ioeventfd as something that hooks the system bus, not the processor-chipset link, and the problem goes away. In practice, any per-cpu io port (for SMM or power management) would need synchronous handling; an eventfd isn't a suitable way to communicate it. > > But even if this were the case, the path that a PIO operation takes > should not be impacted by ioeventfd. IOW, a device shouldn't be > allocating an eventfd() and handing it to a magical KVM call. > Instead, a device should register a callback for a particular port in > the same way it always does. *As an optimization*, we should have > another interface that says that these values are only valid for this > IO port. That would let us create eventfds and register things behind > the scenes. The semantics are different. The normal callbacks are synchronous; the vcpu is halted until the callback is serviced. For most callbacks, this is critical, not just per-cpu things like vmport (example: cirrus back switching). I agree it shouldn't be done by a kvm-specific kvm call, but instead by an API, but that API needs to be explicitly asynchronous. When we further thread qemu, we'd also need to specify which thread is to execute the callback (and the implementation would add the eventfd to the thread's fd poll list). > > That means we can handle TCG, older KVM kernels, and newer KVM kernels > without any special support in the device model. It also means that > the device models never have to worry about KVMState because there's > an entirely different piece of code that's consulting the set of > special ports and then deciding how to handle it. The result is > better, more portable code that doesn't have KVM-isms. Yes. > > If passing state around seems to be ugly, it's probably because we're > not abstracting things correctly. Removing the state and making it > implicit is the wrong solution. I agree with the general sentiment that utilizing the fact that a variable is global to make it implicit is bad from a software engineering point of view. By restricting access to variables and functions, you can enforce modularity on the code. Much like the private: specifier in C++ and other languages. > Fixing the abstraction is the right solution (or living with the > ugliness until someone else is motivated to fix it properly). And with that too, especially the parenthesized statement. We have qemu-kvm that is overly pragmatic and trie[sd] not to avoid modifying qemu as much as possible. We have the qemu.git kvm implementation that tries a perfectionist approach that failed because most of the users need the featured and tested pragmatic approach. The two mix like oil and water. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-11 9:17 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 300+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-01-06 17:56 [PATCH 00/35] [PULL] qemu-kvm.git uq/master queue Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 01/35] kvm: Enable user space NMI injection for kvm guest Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 02/35] kvm: convert kvm_ioctl(KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION) to kvm_check_extension() Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 03/35] Clean up cpu_inject_x86_mce() Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 04/35] Add "broadcast" option for mce command Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-09 18:51 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-09 18:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka 2011-01-15 16:24 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-15 16:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 05/35] Add function for checking mca broadcast of CPU Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 06/35] kvm: introduce kvm_mce_in_progress Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 07/35] kvm: kvm_mce_inj_* subroutines for templated error injections Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 08/35] kvm: introduce kvm_inject_x86_mce_on Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 09/35] kvm: x86: Fix DPL write back of segment registers Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 10/35] kvm: x86: Remove obsolete SS.RPL/DPL aligment Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 11/35] kvm: x86: Prevent sign extension of DR7 in guest debugging mode Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 12/35] kvm: x86: Fix a few coding style violations Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 13/35] kvm: Fix " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 14/35] kvm: Drop return value of kvm_cpu_exec Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-08 13:09 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-08 13:09 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 15/35] kvm: Stop on all fatal exit reasons Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 16/35] kvm: Improve reporting of fatal errors Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 17/35] x86: Optionally dump code bytes on cpu_dump_state Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 18/35] kvm: x86: Align kvm_arch_put_registers code with comment Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 19/35] kvm: x86: Prepare kvm_get_mp_state for in-kernel irqchip Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 20/35] kvm: x86: Remove redundant mp_state initialization Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 21/35] kvm: x86: Fix xcr0 reset mismerge Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 22/35] kvm: x86: Refactor msr_star/hsave_pa setup and checks Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 23/35] kvm: x86: Reset paravirtual MSRs Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 24/35] Synchronize VCPU states before reset Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 25/35] kvm: x86: Drop MCE MSRs write back restrictions Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 26/35] kvm: Eliminate KVMState arguments Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 19:24 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-06 19:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori 2011-01-07 9:03 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-07 9:03 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka 2011-01-07 23:27 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-07 23:27 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori 2011-01-08 8:47 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-08 8:47 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka 2011-01-10 19:59 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-10 19:59 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori 2011-01-10 20:12 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-10 20:12 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka 2011-01-10 20:23 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-10 20:34 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-11 9:01 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-11 9:01 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-11 14:00 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-11 14:00 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-11 14:06 ` Alexander Graf 2011-01-11 14:06 ` Alexander Graf 2011-01-11 14:09 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-11 14:09 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-11 14:22 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-11 14:22 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-11 14:36 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-11 14:36 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-11 14:56 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-11 14:56 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-11 15:12 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-11 15:12 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-11 15:17 ` Alexander Graf 2011-01-11 15:17 ` Alexander Graf 2011-01-11 15:37 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-11 15:37 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-11 15:55 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-11 15:55 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-11 16:03 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-11 16:03 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-11 16:26 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-11 16:26 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-11 17:05 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-11 17:05 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-11 14:24 ` Alexander Graf 2011-01-11 14:24 ` Alexander Graf 2011-01-11 14:18 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-11 14:18 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-11 14:28 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-11 14:28 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-11 14:52 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-11 14:52 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-10 20:11 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-10 20:15 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-11 9:17 ` Avi Kivity [this message] 2011-01-11 9:17 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 27/35] kvm: x86: Fix !CONFIG_KVM_PARA build Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 28/35] kvm: x86: Introduce kvmclock device to save/restore its state Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-10 20:31 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-10 20:31 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-10 21:06 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-10 21:06 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-10 22:21 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-10 22:21 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-10 23:02 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-10 23:02 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-11 5:54 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-11 5:54 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-11 8:00 ` Paolo Bonzini 2011-01-11 8:00 ` Paolo Bonzini 2011-01-11 8:53 ` Gerd Hoffmann 2011-01-11 8:53 ` Gerd Hoffmann 2011-01-11 17:13 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-11 17:13 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-11 9:31 ` Markus Armbruster 2011-01-11 9:31 ` Markus Armbruster 2011-01-11 13:54 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-11 13:54 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-12 10:22 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-12 10:22 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-12 10:31 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-12 10:31 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-18 14:28 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-18 14:28 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-18 15:04 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-18 15:04 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-18 15:43 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-18 15:43 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-18 15:48 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-18 15:48 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-18 15:54 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-18 15:54 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-18 17:02 ` Alex Williamson 2011-01-18 17:02 ` Alex Williamson 2011-01-18 17:08 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-18 17:08 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-18 17:39 ` Alex Williamson 2011-01-18 17:39 ` Alex Williamson 2011-01-18 15:50 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-18 15:50 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-18 16:01 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-18 16:01 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-18 16:04 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-18 16:04 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-18 16:17 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-18 16:17 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-18 16:37 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-18 16:37 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-18 16:56 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-18 16:56 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-18 17:09 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-18 17:09 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-18 17:20 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-18 17:20 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-18 17:31 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-18 17:31 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-18 17:45 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-18 17:45 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-19 9:48 ` Gerd Hoffmann 2011-01-19 9:48 ` Gerd Hoffmann 2011-01-19 13:11 ` Markus Armbruster 2011-01-19 13:11 ` Markus Armbruster 2011-01-19 16:54 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-19 16:54 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-19 17:19 ` Daniel P. Berrange 2011-01-19 17:19 ` Daniel P. Berrange 2011-01-19 17:43 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-19 17:43 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-20 8:44 ` Gerd Hoffmann 2011-01-20 8:44 ` Gerd Hoffmann 2011-01-20 10:33 ` Daniel P. Berrange 2011-01-20 10:33 ` Daniel P. Berrange 2011-01-20 19:42 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-20 19:42 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-20 19:39 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-20 19:39 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-21 8:35 ` Gerd Hoffmann 2011-01-21 8:35 ` Gerd Hoffmann 2011-01-21 10:03 ` Markus Armbruster 2011-01-21 10:03 ` Markus Armbruster 2011-01-19 16:53 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-19 16:53 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-19 17:01 ` Daniel P. Berrange 2011-01-19 17:01 ` Daniel P. Berrange 2011-01-19 17:51 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-19 17:51 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-19 18:52 ` Daniel P. Berrange 2011-01-19 18:52 ` Daniel P. Berrange 2011-01-19 18:58 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-19 18:58 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-19 17:35 ` Daniel P. Berrange 2011-01-19 17:35 ` Daniel P. Berrange 2011-01-19 17:42 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-19 17:42 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-19 18:53 ` Daniel P. Berrange 2011-01-19 18:53 ` Daniel P. Berrange 2011-01-19 13:09 ` Markus Armbruster 2011-01-19 13:09 ` Markus Armbruster 2011-01-24 8:45 ` Gleb Natapov 2011-01-24 8:45 ` Gleb Natapov 2011-01-19 13:15 ` Markus Armbruster 2011-01-19 13:15 ` Markus Armbruster 2011-01-19 16:57 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-19 16:57 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori 2011-01-19 17:25 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-19 17:25 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-19 19:32 ` Blue Swirl 2011-01-19 19:32 ` Blue Swirl 2011-01-20 9:33 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-20 9:33 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-20 19:27 ` Blue Swirl 2011-01-20 19:27 ` Blue Swirl 2011-01-20 21:22 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-20 21:22 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-20 21:40 ` Blue Swirl 2011-01-20 21:40 ` Blue Swirl 2011-01-20 21:53 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-20 21:53 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-25 11:10 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-25 11:10 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-21 8:46 ` Gerd Hoffmann 2011-01-21 8:46 ` Gerd Hoffmann 2011-01-21 10:05 ` Markus Armbruster 2011-01-21 10:05 ` Markus Armbruster 2011-01-21 16:37 ` Blue Swirl 2011-01-21 16:37 ` Blue Swirl 2011-01-21 17:21 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-21 17:21 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-21 18:04 ` Blue Swirl 2011-01-21 18:04 ` Blue Swirl 2011-01-21 18:17 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-21 18:17 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-21 18:49 ` Blue Swirl 2011-01-21 18:49 ` Blue Swirl 2011-01-24 14:08 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-24 14:08 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-24 21:35 ` Blue Swirl 2011-01-24 21:35 ` Blue Swirl 2011-01-24 21:57 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-24 21:57 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-20 19:37 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-20 19:37 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-20 20:02 ` Blue Swirl 2011-01-20 20:02 ` Blue Swirl 2011-01-20 21:42 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-20 21:42 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-20 21:27 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-20 21:27 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-25 11:06 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-25 11:06 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-25 14:30 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-25 14:30 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-25 10:34 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-25 10:34 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-25 10:27 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-25 10:27 ` Avi Kivity 2011-01-25 13:58 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-25 13:58 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-12 12:04 ` Markus Armbruster 2011-01-12 12:04 ` Markus Armbruster 2011-01-10 23:04 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-10 23:04 ` Anthony Liguori 2011-01-11 5:55 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-11 5:55 ` Jan Kiszka 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 29/35] kvm: Drop smp_cpus argument from init functions Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 30/35] kvm: Consolidate must-have capability checks Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 31/35] kvm: x86: Rework identity map and TSS setup for larger BIOS sizes Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 32/35] kvm: Flush coalesced mmio buffer on IO window exits Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 33/35] kvm: Do not use qemu_fair_mutex Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 34/35] kvm: x86: Implicitly clear nmi_injected/pending on reset Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 35/35] kvm: x86: Only read/write MSR_KVM_ASYNC_PF_EN if supported Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti 2011-01-27 14:39 ` [PATCH] kvm: x86: Fix build in absence of KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF Jan Kiszka 2011-01-27 14:39 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=4D2C2033.7040807@redhat.com \ --to=avi@redhat.com \ --cc=agraf@suse.de \ --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \ --cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \ --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.