From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 26/35] kvm: Eliminate KVMState arguments
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:18:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D2C66D0.8030602@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D2C6290.1060607@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 01/11/2011 04:00 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/11/2011 03:01 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 01/10/2011 10:23 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>>> I don't see how ioapic, pit, or pic have a system scope.
>>>> They are not bound to any CPU like the APIC which you may have in
>>>> mind.
>>>
>>> And none of the above interact with KVM.
>>
>> They're implemented by kvm. What deeper interaction do you have in
>> mind?
>
> The emulated ioapic/pit/pic do not interact with KVM at all.
How can they "not interact" with kvm if they're implemented by kvm?
I really don't follow here.
>
> The KVM versions should be completely separate devices.
>
Why?
>> I don't see why. Those are just two different implementations for
>> the same guest visible device.
>
> Right, they should appear the same to the guest but the fact that
> they're two different implementations should be reflected in the
> device tree.
Why?
To move beyond single-word questions, what is the purpose of the device
tree? In my mind, it reflects the virtual hardware. What's important
is that we have a PIC, virtio network adapter, and IDE disk. Not that
they're backed by kvm, vhost-net, and qcow2.
>
>> It's like saying IDE should be seen differently if it's backed by
>> qcow2 or qed.
>
> No, it's not at all.
>
> Advantages of separating KVM devices:
>
> 1) it becomes very clear what functionality is handled in the kernel
> verses in userspace (you can actually look at the code and tell)
How something is implemented is not important, certainly not important
enough to expose to the user as an monitor or live migration ABI.
>
> 2) a user can explicitly create either the emulated version of the
> device or the in-kernel version of the device (no need for
> -no-kvm-irqchip)
-device ioapic,model=kernel vs. -device kvm-ioapic?
Is it really important to do that? 110% of the time we want the kernel
irqchips. The remaining -10% are only used for testing.
>
> 3) a user can pass parameters directly to the in-kernel version of the
> device that are different from the userspace version (like selecting
> different interrupt catch-up methods)
-device pit,model=qemu,catchup=slew
error: catchup=slew not supported in this model
I'm not overly concerned about the implementation part. Though I think
it's better to have a single implementation with kvm acting as an
accelerator, having it the other way is no big deal. What I am worried
about is exposing it as a monitor and migration ABI. IMO the only
important thing is the spec that the device implements, not what piece
of code implements it.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 26/35] kvm: Eliminate KVMState arguments
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:18:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D2C66D0.8030602@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D2C6290.1060607@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 01/11/2011 04:00 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/11/2011 03:01 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 01/10/2011 10:23 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>>> I don't see how ioapic, pit, or pic have a system scope.
>>>> They are not bound to any CPU like the APIC which you may have in
>>>> mind.
>>>
>>> And none of the above interact with KVM.
>>
>> They're implemented by kvm. What deeper interaction do you have in
>> mind?
>
> The emulated ioapic/pit/pic do not interact with KVM at all.
How can they "not interact" with kvm if they're implemented by kvm?
I really don't follow here.
>
> The KVM versions should be completely separate devices.
>
Why?
>> I don't see why. Those are just two different implementations for
>> the same guest visible device.
>
> Right, they should appear the same to the guest but the fact that
> they're two different implementations should be reflected in the
> device tree.
Why?
To move beyond single-word questions, what is the purpose of the device
tree? In my mind, it reflects the virtual hardware. What's important
is that we have a PIC, virtio network adapter, and IDE disk. Not that
they're backed by kvm, vhost-net, and qcow2.
>
>> It's like saying IDE should be seen differently if it's backed by
>> qcow2 or qed.
>
> No, it's not at all.
>
> Advantages of separating KVM devices:
>
> 1) it becomes very clear what functionality is handled in the kernel
> verses in userspace (you can actually look at the code and tell)
How something is implemented is not important, certainly not important
enough to expose to the user as an monitor or live migration ABI.
>
> 2) a user can explicitly create either the emulated version of the
> device or the in-kernel version of the device (no need for
> -no-kvm-irqchip)
-device ioapic,model=kernel vs. -device kvm-ioapic?
Is it really important to do that? 110% of the time we want the kernel
irqchips. The remaining -10% are only used for testing.
>
> 3) a user can pass parameters directly to the in-kernel version of the
> device that are different from the userspace version (like selecting
> different interrupt catch-up methods)
-device pit,model=qemu,catchup=slew
error: catchup=slew not supported in this model
I'm not overly concerned about the implementation part. Though I think
it's better to have a single implementation with kvm acting as an
accelerator, having it the other way is no big deal. What I am worried
about is exposing it as a monitor and migration ABI. IMO the only
important thing is the spec that the device implements, not what piece
of code implements it.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-11 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 300+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-06 17:56 [PATCH 00/35] [PULL] qemu-kvm.git uq/master queue Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 01/35] kvm: Enable user space NMI injection for kvm guest Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 02/35] kvm: convert kvm_ioctl(KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION) to kvm_check_extension() Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 03/35] Clean up cpu_inject_x86_mce() Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 04/35] Add "broadcast" option for mce command Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-09 18:51 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-09 18:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2011-01-15 16:24 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-15 16:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 05/35] Add function for checking mca broadcast of CPU Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 06/35] kvm: introduce kvm_mce_in_progress Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 07/35] kvm: kvm_mce_inj_* subroutines for templated error injections Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 08/35] kvm: introduce kvm_inject_x86_mce_on Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 09/35] kvm: x86: Fix DPL write back of segment registers Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 10/35] kvm: x86: Remove obsolete SS.RPL/DPL aligment Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 11/35] kvm: x86: Prevent sign extension of DR7 in guest debugging mode Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 12/35] kvm: x86: Fix a few coding style violations Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 13/35] kvm: Fix " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 14/35] kvm: Drop return value of kvm_cpu_exec Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-08 13:09 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-08 13:09 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 15/35] kvm: Stop on all fatal exit reasons Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 16/35] kvm: Improve reporting of fatal errors Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 17/35] x86: Optionally dump code bytes on cpu_dump_state Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 18/35] kvm: x86: Align kvm_arch_put_registers code with comment Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 19/35] kvm: x86: Prepare kvm_get_mp_state for in-kernel irqchip Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 20/35] kvm: x86: Remove redundant mp_state initialization Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 21/35] kvm: x86: Fix xcr0 reset mismerge Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 22/35] kvm: x86: Refactor msr_star/hsave_pa setup and checks Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 23/35] kvm: x86: Reset paravirtual MSRs Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 24/35] Synchronize VCPU states before reset Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 25/35] kvm: x86: Drop MCE MSRs write back restrictions Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 26/35] kvm: Eliminate KVMState arguments Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 19:24 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-06 19:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2011-01-07 9:03 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-07 9:03 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2011-01-07 23:27 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-07 23:27 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2011-01-08 8:47 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-08 8:47 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2011-01-10 19:59 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-10 19:59 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2011-01-10 20:12 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-10 20:12 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2011-01-10 20:23 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-10 20:34 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-11 9:01 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-11 9:01 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-11 14:00 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-11 14:00 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-11 14:06 ` Alexander Graf
2011-01-11 14:06 ` Alexander Graf
2011-01-11 14:09 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-11 14:09 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-11 14:22 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-11 14:22 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-11 14:36 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-11 14:36 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-11 14:56 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-11 14:56 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-11 15:12 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-11 15:12 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-11 15:17 ` Alexander Graf
2011-01-11 15:17 ` Alexander Graf
2011-01-11 15:37 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-11 15:37 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-11 15:55 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-11 15:55 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-11 16:03 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-11 16:03 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-11 16:26 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-11 16:26 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-11 17:05 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-11 17:05 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-11 14:24 ` Alexander Graf
2011-01-11 14:24 ` Alexander Graf
2011-01-11 14:18 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-01-11 14:18 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-11 14:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-11 14:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-11 14:52 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-11 14:52 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-10 20:11 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-10 20:15 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-11 9:17 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-11 9:17 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 27/35] kvm: x86: Fix !CONFIG_KVM_PARA build Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 28/35] kvm: x86: Introduce kvmclock device to save/restore its state Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-10 20:31 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-10 20:31 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-10 21:06 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-10 21:06 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-10 22:21 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-10 22:21 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-10 23:02 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-10 23:02 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-11 5:54 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-11 5:54 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-11 8:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-01-11 8:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-01-11 8:53 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-11 8:53 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-11 17:13 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-11 17:13 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-11 9:31 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-01-11 9:31 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-01-11 13:54 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-11 13:54 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-12 10:22 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-12 10:22 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-12 10:31 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-12 10:31 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-18 14:28 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-18 14:28 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-18 15:04 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-18 15:04 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-18 15:43 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-18 15:43 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-18 15:48 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-18 15:48 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-18 15:54 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-18 15:54 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-18 17:02 ` Alex Williamson
2011-01-18 17:02 ` Alex Williamson
2011-01-18 17:08 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-18 17:08 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-18 17:39 ` Alex Williamson
2011-01-18 17:39 ` Alex Williamson
2011-01-18 15:50 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-18 15:50 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-18 16:01 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-18 16:01 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-18 16:04 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-18 16:04 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-18 16:17 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-18 16:17 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-18 16:37 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-18 16:37 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-18 16:56 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-18 16:56 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-18 17:09 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-18 17:09 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-18 17:20 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-18 17:20 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-18 17:31 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-18 17:31 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-18 17:45 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-18 17:45 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-19 9:48 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-19 9:48 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-19 13:11 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-01-19 13:11 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-01-19 16:54 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-19 16:54 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-19 17:19 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-01-19 17:19 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-01-19 17:43 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-19 17:43 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-20 8:44 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-20 8:44 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-20 10:33 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-01-20 10:33 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-01-20 19:42 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-20 19:42 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-20 19:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-20 19:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-21 8:35 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-21 8:35 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-21 10:03 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-01-21 10:03 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-01-19 16:53 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-19 16:53 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-19 17:01 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-01-19 17:01 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-01-19 17:51 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-19 17:51 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-19 18:52 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-01-19 18:52 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-01-19 18:58 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-19 18:58 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-19 17:35 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-01-19 17:35 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-01-19 17:42 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-19 17:42 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-19 18:53 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-01-19 18:53 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-01-19 13:09 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-01-19 13:09 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-01-24 8:45 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-01-24 8:45 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-01-19 13:15 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-01-19 13:15 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-01-19 16:57 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-19 16:57 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2011-01-19 17:25 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-19 17:25 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-19 19:32 ` Blue Swirl
2011-01-19 19:32 ` Blue Swirl
2011-01-20 9:33 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-20 9:33 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-20 19:27 ` Blue Swirl
2011-01-20 19:27 ` Blue Swirl
2011-01-20 21:22 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-20 21:22 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-20 21:40 ` Blue Swirl
2011-01-20 21:40 ` Blue Swirl
2011-01-20 21:53 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-20 21:53 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-25 11:10 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-25 11:10 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-21 8:46 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-21 8:46 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-01-21 10:05 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-01-21 10:05 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-01-21 16:37 ` Blue Swirl
2011-01-21 16:37 ` Blue Swirl
2011-01-21 17:21 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-21 17:21 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-21 18:04 ` Blue Swirl
2011-01-21 18:04 ` Blue Swirl
2011-01-21 18:17 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-21 18:17 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-21 18:49 ` Blue Swirl
2011-01-21 18:49 ` Blue Swirl
2011-01-24 14:08 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-24 14:08 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-24 21:35 ` Blue Swirl
2011-01-24 21:35 ` Blue Swirl
2011-01-24 21:57 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-24 21:57 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-20 19:37 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-20 19:37 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-20 20:02 ` Blue Swirl
2011-01-20 20:02 ` Blue Swirl
2011-01-20 21:42 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-20 21:42 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-20 21:27 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-20 21:27 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-25 11:06 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-25 11:06 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-25 14:30 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-25 14:30 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-25 10:34 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-25 10:34 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-25 10:27 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-25 10:27 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-25 13:58 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-25 13:58 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-12 12:04 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-01-12 12:04 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-01-10 23:04 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-10 23:04 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-01-11 5:55 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-11 5:55 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 29/35] kvm: Drop smp_cpus argument from init functions Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 30/35] kvm: Consolidate must-have capability checks Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 31/35] kvm: x86: Rework identity map and TSS setup for larger BIOS sizes Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 32/35] kvm: Flush coalesced mmio buffer on IO window exits Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 33/35] kvm: Do not use qemu_fair_mutex Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 34/35] kvm: x86: Implicitly clear nmi_injected/pending on reset Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [PATCH 35/35] kvm: x86: Only read/write MSR_KVM_ASYNC_PF_EN if supported Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-06 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-27 14:39 ` [PATCH] kvm: x86: Fix build in absence of KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF Jan Kiszka
2011-01-27 14:39 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D2C66D0.8030602@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.