All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: "Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>,
	"Linux PWM List" <linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"ACPI Devel Maling List" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/15] ACPI / LPSS: Save Cherry Trail PWM ctx registers only once (at activation)
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:04:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jYuKFmabZg+Y-rvXFF_EBfXKn=vOcyxFEs9bJugtvCfg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200620121758.14836-3-hdegoede@redhat.com>

On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 2:18 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> The DSDTs on most Cherry Trail devices have an ugly clutch where the PWM
> controller gets turned off from the _PS3 method of the graphics-card dev:
>
>             Method (_PS3, 0, Serialized)  // _PS3: Power State 3
>             {
>                 ...
>                             PWMB = PWMC /* \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.PWMC */
>                             PSAT |= 0x03
>                             Local0 = PSAT /* \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.PSAT */
>                 ...
>             }
>
> Where PSAT is the power-status register of the PWM controller.
>
> Since the i915 driver will do a pwm_get on the pwm device as it uses it to
> control the LCD panel backlight, there is a device-link marking the i915
> device as a consumer of the pwm device. So that the PWM controller will
> always be suspended after the i915 driver suspends (which is the right
> thing to do). This causes the above GFX0 PS3 AML code to run before
> acpi_lpss.c calls acpi_lpss_save_ctx().
>
> So on these devices the PWM controller will already be off when
> acpi_lpss_save_ctx() runs. This causes it to read/save all 1-s (0xffffffff)
> as ctx register values.
>
> When these bogus values get restored on resume the PWM controller actually
> keeps working, since most bits are reserved, but this does set bit 3 of
> the LPSS General purpose register, which for the PWM controller has the
> following function: "This bit is re-used to support 32kHz slow mode.
> Default is 19.2MHz as PWM source clock".
>
> This causes the clock of the PWM controller to switch from 19.2MHz to
> 32KHz, which is a slow-down of a factor 600. Surprisingly enough so far
> there have been few bug reports about this. This is likely because the
> i915 driver was hardcoding the PWM frequency to 46 KHz, which divided
> by 600 would result in a PWM frequency of approx. 78 Hz, which mostly
> still works fine. There are some bug reports about the LCD backlight
> flickering after suspend/resume which are likely caused by this issue.
>
> But with the upcoming patch-series to finally switch the i915 drivers
> code for external PWM controllers to use the atomic API and to honor
> the PWM frequency specified in the video BIOS (VBT), this becomes a much
> bigger problem. On most cases the VBT specifies either 200 Hz or 20
> KHz as PWM frequency, which with the mentioned issue ends up being either
> 1/3 Hz, where the backlight actually visible blinks on and off every 3s,
> or in 33 Hz and horrible flickering of the backlight.
>
> There are a number of possible solutions to this problem:
>
> 1. Make acpi_lpss_save_ctx() run before GFX0._PS3
>  Pro: Clean solution from pov of not medling with save/restore ctx code
>  Con: As mentioned the current ordering is the right thing to do
>  Con: Requires assymmetry in at what suspend/resume phase we do the save vs
>       restore, requiring more suspend/resume ordering hacks in already
>       convoluted acpi_lpss.c suspend/resume code.
> 2. Do some sort of save once mode for the LPSS ctx
>  Pro: Reasonably clean
>  Con: Needs a new LPSS flag + code changes to handle the flag
> 3. Detect we have failed to save the ctx registers and do not restore them
>  Pro: Not PWM specific, might help with issues on other LPSS devices too
>  Con: If we can get away with not restoring the ctx why bother with it at
>       all?
> 4. Do not save the ctx for CHT PWM controllers
>  Pro: Clean, as simple as dropping a flag?
>  Con: Not so simple as dropping a flag, needs a new flag to ensure that
>       we still do lpss_deassert_reset() on device activation.
> 5. Make the pwm-lpss code fixup the LPSS-context registers
>  Pro: Keeps acpi_lpss.c code clean
>  Con: Moves knowledge of LPSS-context into the pwm-lpss.c code
>
> 1 and 5 both do not seem to be a desirable way forward.
>
> 3 and 4 seem ok, but they both assume that restoring the LPSS-context
> registers is not necessary. I have done a couple of test and those do
> show that restoring the LPSS-context indeed does not seem to be necessary
> on devices using s2idle suspend (and successfully reaching S0i3). But I
> have no hardware to test deep / S3 suspend. So I'm not sure that not
> restoring the context is safe.
>
> That leaves solution 2, which is about as simple / clean as 3 and 4,
> so this commit fixes the described problem by implementing a new
> LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE flag and setting that for the CHT PWM controllers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Move #define LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE define to group it with LPSS_SAVE_CTX
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> index 446e666b3466..7e6db0f1d9ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> @@ -67,7 +67,15 @@ ACPI_MODULE_NAME("acpi_lpss");
>  #define LPSS_CLK_DIVIDER               BIT(2)
>  #define LPSS_LTR                       BIT(3)
>  #define LPSS_SAVE_CTX                  BIT(4)
> -#define LPSS_NO_D3_DELAY               BIT(5)
> +/*
> + * For some devices the DSDT AML code for another device turns off the device
> + * before our suspend handler runs, causing us to read/save all 1-s (0xffffffff)
> + * as ctx register values.
> + * Luckily these devices always use the same ctx register values, so we can
> + * work around this by saving the ctx registers once on activation.
> + */
> +#define LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE             BIT(5)
> +#define LPSS_NO_D3_DELAY               BIT(6)
>
>  struct lpss_private_data;
>
> @@ -254,7 +262,7 @@ static const struct lpss_device_desc byt_pwm_dev_desc = {
>  };
>
>  static const struct lpss_device_desc bsw_pwm_dev_desc = {
> -       .flags = LPSS_SAVE_CTX | LPSS_NO_D3_DELAY,
> +       .flags = LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE | LPSS_NO_D3_DELAY,
>         .prv_offset = 0x800,
>         .setup = bsw_pwm_setup,
>         .resume_from_noirq = true,
> @@ -885,9 +893,14 @@ static int acpi_lpss_activate(struct device *dev)
>          * we have to deassert reset line to be sure that ->probe() will
>          * recognize the device.
>          */
> -       if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & LPSS_SAVE_CTX)
> +       if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & (LPSS_SAVE_CTX | LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE))
>                 lpss_deassert_reset(pdata);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +       if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE)
> +               acpi_lpss_save_ctx(dev, pdata);
> +#endif
> +
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> @@ -1036,7 +1049,7 @@ static int acpi_lpss_resume(struct device *dev)
>
>         acpi_lpss_d3_to_d0_delay(pdata);
>
> -       if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & LPSS_SAVE_CTX)
> +       if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & (LPSS_SAVE_CTX | LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE))
>                 acpi_lpss_restore_ctx(dev, pdata);
>
>         return 0;
> --
> 2.26.2
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: "Linux PWM List" <linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"ACPI Devel Maling List" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/15] ACPI / LPSS: Save Cherry Trail PWM ctx registers only once (at activation)
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:04:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jYuKFmabZg+Y-rvXFF_EBfXKn=vOcyxFEs9bJugtvCfg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200620121758.14836-3-hdegoede@redhat.com>

On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 2:18 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> The DSDTs on most Cherry Trail devices have an ugly clutch where the PWM
> controller gets turned off from the _PS3 method of the graphics-card dev:
>
>             Method (_PS3, 0, Serialized)  // _PS3: Power State 3
>             {
>                 ...
>                             PWMB = PWMC /* \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.PWMC */
>                             PSAT |= 0x03
>                             Local0 = PSAT /* \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.PSAT */
>                 ...
>             }
>
> Where PSAT is the power-status register of the PWM controller.
>
> Since the i915 driver will do a pwm_get on the pwm device as it uses it to
> control the LCD panel backlight, there is a device-link marking the i915
> device as a consumer of the pwm device. So that the PWM controller will
> always be suspended after the i915 driver suspends (which is the right
> thing to do). This causes the above GFX0 PS3 AML code to run before
> acpi_lpss.c calls acpi_lpss_save_ctx().
>
> So on these devices the PWM controller will already be off when
> acpi_lpss_save_ctx() runs. This causes it to read/save all 1-s (0xffffffff)
> as ctx register values.
>
> When these bogus values get restored on resume the PWM controller actually
> keeps working, since most bits are reserved, but this does set bit 3 of
> the LPSS General purpose register, which for the PWM controller has the
> following function: "This bit is re-used to support 32kHz slow mode.
> Default is 19.2MHz as PWM source clock".
>
> This causes the clock of the PWM controller to switch from 19.2MHz to
> 32KHz, which is a slow-down of a factor 600. Surprisingly enough so far
> there have been few bug reports about this. This is likely because the
> i915 driver was hardcoding the PWM frequency to 46 KHz, which divided
> by 600 would result in a PWM frequency of approx. 78 Hz, which mostly
> still works fine. There are some bug reports about the LCD backlight
> flickering after suspend/resume which are likely caused by this issue.
>
> But with the upcoming patch-series to finally switch the i915 drivers
> code for external PWM controllers to use the atomic API and to honor
> the PWM frequency specified in the video BIOS (VBT), this becomes a much
> bigger problem. On most cases the VBT specifies either 200 Hz or 20
> KHz as PWM frequency, which with the mentioned issue ends up being either
> 1/3 Hz, where the backlight actually visible blinks on and off every 3s,
> or in 33 Hz and horrible flickering of the backlight.
>
> There are a number of possible solutions to this problem:
>
> 1. Make acpi_lpss_save_ctx() run before GFX0._PS3
>  Pro: Clean solution from pov of not medling with save/restore ctx code
>  Con: As mentioned the current ordering is the right thing to do
>  Con: Requires assymmetry in at what suspend/resume phase we do the save vs
>       restore, requiring more suspend/resume ordering hacks in already
>       convoluted acpi_lpss.c suspend/resume code.
> 2. Do some sort of save once mode for the LPSS ctx
>  Pro: Reasonably clean
>  Con: Needs a new LPSS flag + code changes to handle the flag
> 3. Detect we have failed to save the ctx registers and do not restore them
>  Pro: Not PWM specific, might help with issues on other LPSS devices too
>  Con: If we can get away with not restoring the ctx why bother with it at
>       all?
> 4. Do not save the ctx for CHT PWM controllers
>  Pro: Clean, as simple as dropping a flag?
>  Con: Not so simple as dropping a flag, needs a new flag to ensure that
>       we still do lpss_deassert_reset() on device activation.
> 5. Make the pwm-lpss code fixup the LPSS-context registers
>  Pro: Keeps acpi_lpss.c code clean
>  Con: Moves knowledge of LPSS-context into the pwm-lpss.c code
>
> 1 and 5 both do not seem to be a desirable way forward.
>
> 3 and 4 seem ok, but they both assume that restoring the LPSS-context
> registers is not necessary. I have done a couple of test and those do
> show that restoring the LPSS-context indeed does not seem to be necessary
> on devices using s2idle suspend (and successfully reaching S0i3). But I
> have no hardware to test deep / S3 suspend. So I'm not sure that not
> restoring the context is safe.
>
> That leaves solution 2, which is about as simple / clean as 3 and 4,
> so this commit fixes the described problem by implementing a new
> LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE flag and setting that for the CHT PWM controllers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Move #define LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE define to group it with LPSS_SAVE_CTX
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> index 446e666b3466..7e6db0f1d9ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> @@ -67,7 +67,15 @@ ACPI_MODULE_NAME("acpi_lpss");
>  #define LPSS_CLK_DIVIDER               BIT(2)
>  #define LPSS_LTR                       BIT(3)
>  #define LPSS_SAVE_CTX                  BIT(4)
> -#define LPSS_NO_D3_DELAY               BIT(5)
> +/*
> + * For some devices the DSDT AML code for another device turns off the device
> + * before our suspend handler runs, causing us to read/save all 1-s (0xffffffff)
> + * as ctx register values.
> + * Luckily these devices always use the same ctx register values, so we can
> + * work around this by saving the ctx registers once on activation.
> + */
> +#define LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE             BIT(5)
> +#define LPSS_NO_D3_DELAY               BIT(6)
>
>  struct lpss_private_data;
>
> @@ -254,7 +262,7 @@ static const struct lpss_device_desc byt_pwm_dev_desc = {
>  };
>
>  static const struct lpss_device_desc bsw_pwm_dev_desc = {
> -       .flags = LPSS_SAVE_CTX | LPSS_NO_D3_DELAY,
> +       .flags = LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE | LPSS_NO_D3_DELAY,
>         .prv_offset = 0x800,
>         .setup = bsw_pwm_setup,
>         .resume_from_noirq = true,
> @@ -885,9 +893,14 @@ static int acpi_lpss_activate(struct device *dev)
>          * we have to deassert reset line to be sure that ->probe() will
>          * recognize the device.
>          */
> -       if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & LPSS_SAVE_CTX)
> +       if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & (LPSS_SAVE_CTX | LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE))
>                 lpss_deassert_reset(pdata);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +       if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE)
> +               acpi_lpss_save_ctx(dev, pdata);
> +#endif
> +
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> @@ -1036,7 +1049,7 @@ static int acpi_lpss_resume(struct device *dev)
>
>         acpi_lpss_d3_to_d0_delay(pdata);
>
> -       if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & LPSS_SAVE_CTX)
> +       if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & (LPSS_SAVE_CTX | LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE))
>                 acpi_lpss_restore_ctx(dev, pdata);
>
>         return 0;
> --
> 2.26.2
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: "Linux PWM List" <linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"ACPI Devel Maling List" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 02/15] ACPI / LPSS: Save Cherry Trail PWM ctx registers only once (at activation)
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:04:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jYuKFmabZg+Y-rvXFF_EBfXKn=vOcyxFEs9bJugtvCfg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200620121758.14836-3-hdegoede@redhat.com>

On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 2:18 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> The DSDTs on most Cherry Trail devices have an ugly clutch where the PWM
> controller gets turned off from the _PS3 method of the graphics-card dev:
>
>             Method (_PS3, 0, Serialized)  // _PS3: Power State 3
>             {
>                 ...
>                             PWMB = PWMC /* \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.PWMC */
>                             PSAT |= 0x03
>                             Local0 = PSAT /* \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.PSAT */
>                 ...
>             }
>
> Where PSAT is the power-status register of the PWM controller.
>
> Since the i915 driver will do a pwm_get on the pwm device as it uses it to
> control the LCD panel backlight, there is a device-link marking the i915
> device as a consumer of the pwm device. So that the PWM controller will
> always be suspended after the i915 driver suspends (which is the right
> thing to do). This causes the above GFX0 PS3 AML code to run before
> acpi_lpss.c calls acpi_lpss_save_ctx().
>
> So on these devices the PWM controller will already be off when
> acpi_lpss_save_ctx() runs. This causes it to read/save all 1-s (0xffffffff)
> as ctx register values.
>
> When these bogus values get restored on resume the PWM controller actually
> keeps working, since most bits are reserved, but this does set bit 3 of
> the LPSS General purpose register, which for the PWM controller has the
> following function: "This bit is re-used to support 32kHz slow mode.
> Default is 19.2MHz as PWM source clock".
>
> This causes the clock of the PWM controller to switch from 19.2MHz to
> 32KHz, which is a slow-down of a factor 600. Surprisingly enough so far
> there have been few bug reports about this. This is likely because the
> i915 driver was hardcoding the PWM frequency to 46 KHz, which divided
> by 600 would result in a PWM frequency of approx. 78 Hz, which mostly
> still works fine. There are some bug reports about the LCD backlight
> flickering after suspend/resume which are likely caused by this issue.
>
> But with the upcoming patch-series to finally switch the i915 drivers
> code for external PWM controllers to use the atomic API and to honor
> the PWM frequency specified in the video BIOS (VBT), this becomes a much
> bigger problem. On most cases the VBT specifies either 200 Hz or 20
> KHz as PWM frequency, which with the mentioned issue ends up being either
> 1/3 Hz, where the backlight actually visible blinks on and off every 3s,
> or in 33 Hz and horrible flickering of the backlight.
>
> There are a number of possible solutions to this problem:
>
> 1. Make acpi_lpss_save_ctx() run before GFX0._PS3
>  Pro: Clean solution from pov of not medling with save/restore ctx code
>  Con: As mentioned the current ordering is the right thing to do
>  Con: Requires assymmetry in at what suspend/resume phase we do the save vs
>       restore, requiring more suspend/resume ordering hacks in already
>       convoluted acpi_lpss.c suspend/resume code.
> 2. Do some sort of save once mode for the LPSS ctx
>  Pro: Reasonably clean
>  Con: Needs a new LPSS flag + code changes to handle the flag
> 3. Detect we have failed to save the ctx registers and do not restore them
>  Pro: Not PWM specific, might help with issues on other LPSS devices too
>  Con: If we can get away with not restoring the ctx why bother with it at
>       all?
> 4. Do not save the ctx for CHT PWM controllers
>  Pro: Clean, as simple as dropping a flag?
>  Con: Not so simple as dropping a flag, needs a new flag to ensure that
>       we still do lpss_deassert_reset() on device activation.
> 5. Make the pwm-lpss code fixup the LPSS-context registers
>  Pro: Keeps acpi_lpss.c code clean
>  Con: Moves knowledge of LPSS-context into the pwm-lpss.c code
>
> 1 and 5 both do not seem to be a desirable way forward.
>
> 3 and 4 seem ok, but they both assume that restoring the LPSS-context
> registers is not necessary. I have done a couple of test and those do
> show that restoring the LPSS-context indeed does not seem to be necessary
> on devices using s2idle suspend (and successfully reaching S0i3). But I
> have no hardware to test deep / S3 suspend. So I'm not sure that not
> restoring the context is safe.
>
> That leaves solution 2, which is about as simple / clean as 3 and 4,
> so this commit fixes the described problem by implementing a new
> LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE flag and setting that for the CHT PWM controllers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Move #define LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE define to group it with LPSS_SAVE_CTX
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> index 446e666b3466..7e6db0f1d9ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> @@ -67,7 +67,15 @@ ACPI_MODULE_NAME("acpi_lpss");
>  #define LPSS_CLK_DIVIDER               BIT(2)
>  #define LPSS_LTR                       BIT(3)
>  #define LPSS_SAVE_CTX                  BIT(4)
> -#define LPSS_NO_D3_DELAY               BIT(5)
> +/*
> + * For some devices the DSDT AML code for another device turns off the device
> + * before our suspend handler runs, causing us to read/save all 1-s (0xffffffff)
> + * as ctx register values.
> + * Luckily these devices always use the same ctx register values, so we can
> + * work around this by saving the ctx registers once on activation.
> + */
> +#define LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE             BIT(5)
> +#define LPSS_NO_D3_DELAY               BIT(6)
>
>  struct lpss_private_data;
>
> @@ -254,7 +262,7 @@ static const struct lpss_device_desc byt_pwm_dev_desc = {
>  };
>
>  static const struct lpss_device_desc bsw_pwm_dev_desc = {
> -       .flags = LPSS_SAVE_CTX | LPSS_NO_D3_DELAY,
> +       .flags = LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE | LPSS_NO_D3_DELAY,
>         .prv_offset = 0x800,
>         .setup = bsw_pwm_setup,
>         .resume_from_noirq = true,
> @@ -885,9 +893,14 @@ static int acpi_lpss_activate(struct device *dev)
>          * we have to deassert reset line to be sure that ->probe() will
>          * recognize the device.
>          */
> -       if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & LPSS_SAVE_CTX)
> +       if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & (LPSS_SAVE_CTX | LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE))
>                 lpss_deassert_reset(pdata);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +       if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE)
> +               acpi_lpss_save_ctx(dev, pdata);
> +#endif
> +
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> @@ -1036,7 +1049,7 @@ static int acpi_lpss_resume(struct device *dev)
>
>         acpi_lpss_d3_to_d0_delay(pdata);
>
> -       if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & LPSS_SAVE_CTX)
> +       if (pdata->dev_desc->flags & (LPSS_SAVE_CTX | LPSS_SAVE_CTX_ONCE))
>                 acpi_lpss_restore_ctx(dev, pdata);
>
>         return 0;
> --
> 2.26.2
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-22 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 114+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-20 12:17 [PATCH v3 00/15] acpi/pwm/i915: Convert pwm-crc and i915 driver's PWM code to use the atomic PWM API Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17 ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17 ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] ACPI / LPSS: Resume Cherry Trail PWM controller in no-irq phase Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-22 16:03   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-22 16:03     ` [Intel-gfx] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-22 16:03     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-20 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] ACPI / LPSS: Save Cherry Trail PWM ctx registers only once (at activation) Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-22 16:04   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2020-06-22 16:04     ` [Intel-gfx] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-22 16:04     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-20 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] pwm: lpss: Fix off by one error in base_unit math in pwm_lpss_prepare() Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-22  7:25   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-06-22  7:25     ` [Intel-gfx] " Uwe Kleine-König
2020-06-22  7:25     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-06-20 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] pwm: lpss: Add range limit check for the base_unit register value Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-22  7:35   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-06-22  7:35     ` [Intel-gfx] " Uwe Kleine-König
2020-06-22  7:35     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-06 20:53     ` Hans de Goede
2020-07-06 20:53       ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-07-06 20:53       ` Hans de Goede
2020-07-07  7:34       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-07  7:34         ` [Intel-gfx] " Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-07  7:34         ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-07  8:04         ` Hans de Goede
2020-07-07  8:04           ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-07-07  8:04           ` Hans de Goede
2020-07-07 17:31         ` Hans de Goede
2020-07-07 17:31           ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-07-07 17:31           ` Hans de Goede
2020-07-07 19:09           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-07 19:09             ` [Intel-gfx] " Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-07 19:09             ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-07 19:41             ` Hans de Goede
2020-07-07 19:41               ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-07-07 19:41               ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] pwm: lpss: Use pwm_lpss_apply() when restoring state on resume Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] pwm: crc: Fix period / duty_cycle times being off by a factor of 256 Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] pwm: crc: Fix off-by-one error in the clock-divider calculations Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] pwm: crc: Fix period changes not having any effect Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] pwm: crc: Enable/disable PWM output on enable/disable Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-22  7:55   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-06-22  7:55     ` [Intel-gfx] " Uwe Kleine-König
2020-06-22  7:55     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-06 21:03     ` Hans de Goede
2020-07-06 21:03       ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-07-06 21:03       ` Hans de Goede
2020-07-07  7:26   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-07  7:26     ` [Intel-gfx] " Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-07  7:26     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-06-20 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] pwm: crc: Implement apply() method to support the new atomic PWM API Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] pwm: crc: Implement get_state() method Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-22  7:57   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-06-22  7:57     ` [Intel-gfx] " Uwe Kleine-König
2020-06-22  7:57     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-06 21:05     ` Hans de Goede
2020-07-06 21:05       ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-07-06 21:05       ` Hans de Goede
2020-07-06 21:05       ` Hans de Goede
2020-07-07  7:24       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-07  7:24         ` [Intel-gfx] " Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-07  7:24         ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-06-20 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] drm/i915: panel: Add get_vbt_pwm_freq() helper Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] drm/i915: panel: Honor the VBT PWM frequency for devs with an external PWM controller Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] drm/i915: panel: Honor the VBT PWM min setting " Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] drm/i915: panel: Use atomic PWM API " Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:17   ` Hans de Goede
2020-07-07  7:50   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-07  7:50     ` [Intel-gfx] " Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-07  7:50     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-07-07 19:21     ` Hans de Goede
2020-07-07 19:21       ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-07-07 19:21       ` Hans de Goede
2020-06-20 12:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for acpi/pwm/i915: Convert pwm-crc and i915 driver's PWM code to use the atomic PWM API Patchwork
2020-06-20 13:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-06-20 14:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2020-06-30 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 00/15] " Jani Nikula
2020-06-30 13:51   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2020-06-30 13:51   ` Jani Nikula
2020-06-30 13:51   ` Jani Nikula
2020-07-06 20:53   ` Hans de Goede
2020-07-06 20:53     ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2020-07-06 20:53     ` Hans de Goede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJZ5v0jYuKFmabZg+Y-rvXFF_EBfXKn=vOcyxFEs9bJugtvCfg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.