From: "Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@sony.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: ksummit <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Chris Mason <clm@fb.clm>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] [PATCH] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 15:55:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CY4PR13MB11754FCF904BA5C0A31EA7D2FD660@CY4PR13MB1175.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200707114151.2d7b0fc1@oasis.local.home>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 08:33:33 -0700
> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > >> I was thinking good-list / bad-list.
> > >>
> > >> /me that has been doing a lot of git bisect lately...
> > >
> > > I think it depends on the context. I'd prefer a grammatically awkward verb that described
> > > the action more specifically, than a grammatically nicer generic term. In other words,
> > > yes/no, good/bad don't mean that much to me, unless it's obvious from context
> > > what the effect will be. With something like allow/deny, I have a pretty clear mental
> > > model of what the code is going to do.
> >
> > That matches what I was about to say:
> > Just using yes/no does not tell someone what they are saying yes or no about.
> > It should be more descriptive, like allow/block.
>
> After doing two days worth of git bisect, good/bad is hardcoded in my head :-p
Maybe I have the same bias, because good/bad there doesn't bother me at all. ;-)
Here is some 'motivated reasoning' on my part...
In the git case, the good/bad terms describe the result status of the test, not the action that git
is going to take based on that status. It's pretty clear from context that a 'good'
result will cause that commit and other commits to be added to the 'good' set. I think what
git actually does in constructing the sets is a bit too magical to describe with a simple
verb.
As an aside I just looked up 'git-bisect' documentation, and found it has support
for changing the terms used ('git bisect terms ..') so you can use words like 'fast/slow'
or 'fixed/broken'. That's something I didn't know about. :-)
-- Tim
_______________________________________________
Ksummit-discuss mailing list
Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@sony.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.clm>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ksummit <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: RE: [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] [PATCH] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 15:55:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CY4PR13MB11754FCF904BA5C0A31EA7D2FD660@CY4PR13MB1175.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200707114151.2d7b0fc1@oasis.local.home>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 08:33:33 -0700
> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > >> I was thinking good-list / bad-list.
> > >>
> > >> /me that has been doing a lot of git bisect lately...
> > >
> > > I think it depends on the context. I'd prefer a grammatically awkward verb that described
> > > the action more specifically, than a grammatically nicer generic term. In other words,
> > > yes/no, good/bad don't mean that much to me, unless it's obvious from context
> > > what the effect will be. With something like allow/deny, I have a pretty clear mental
> > > model of what the code is going to do.
> >
> > That matches what I was about to say:
> > Just using yes/no does not tell someone what they are saying yes or no about.
> > It should be more descriptive, like allow/block.
>
> After doing two days worth of git bisect, good/bad is hardcoded in my head :-p
Maybe I have the same bias, because good/bad there doesn't bother me at all. ;-)
Here is some 'motivated reasoning' on my part...
In the git case, the good/bad terms describe the result status of the test, not the action that git
is going to take based on that status. It's pretty clear from context that a 'good'
result will cause that commit and other commits to be added to the 'good' set. I think what
git actually does in constructing the sets is a bit too magical to describe with a simple
verb.
As an aside I just looked up 'git-bisect' documentation, and found it has support
for changing the terms used ('git bisect terms ..') so you can use words like 'fast/slow'
or 'fixed/broken'. That's something I didn't know about. :-)
-- Tim
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@sony.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: ksummit <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.clm>
Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 15:55:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CY4PR13MB11754FCF904BA5C0A31EA7D2FD660@CY4PR13MB1175.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200707114151.2d7b0fc1@oasis.local.home>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 08:33:33 -0700
> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > >> I was thinking good-list / bad-list.
> > >>
> > >> /me that has been doing a lot of git bisect lately...
> > >
> > > I think it depends on the context. I'd prefer a grammatically awkward verb that described
> > > the action more specifically, than a grammatically nicer generic term. In other words,
> > > yes/no, good/bad don't mean that much to me, unless it's obvious from context
> > > what the effect will be. With something like allow/deny, I have a pretty clear mental
> > > model of what the code is going to do.
> >
> > That matches what I was about to say:
> > Just using yes/no does not tell someone what they are saying yes or no about.
> > It should be more descriptive, like allow/block.
>
> After doing two days worth of git bisect, good/bad is hardcoded in my head :-p
Maybe I have the same bias, because good/bad there doesn't bother me at all. ;-)
Here is some 'motivated reasoning' on my part...
In the git case, the good/bad terms describe the result status of the test, not the action that git
is going to take based on that status. It's pretty clear from context that a 'good'
result will cause that commit and other commits to be added to the 'good' set. I think what
git actually does in constructing the sets is a bit too magical to describe with a simple
verb.
As an aside I just looked up 'git-bisect' documentation, and found it has support
for changing the terms used ('git bisect terms ..') so you can use words like 'fast/slow'
or 'fixed/broken'. That's something I didn't know about. :-)
-- Tim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-07 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 281+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-04 20:02 [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology Dan Williams
2020-07-04 20:02 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Dan Williams
2020-07-04 20:02 ` Dan Williams
2020-07-04 20:31 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Randy Dunlap
2020-07-04 20:31 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Randy Dunlap
2020-07-04 20:31 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-07-04 23:41 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Dave Airlie
2020-07-04 23:41 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Dave Airlie
2020-07-04 23:41 ` Dave Airlie
2020-07-05 0:10 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-05 0:10 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-05 1:10 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Kees Cook
2020-07-05 1:10 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " Kees Cook
2020-07-05 1:10 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-05 2:44 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Randy Dunlap
2020-07-05 2:44 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " Randy Dunlap
2020-07-05 2:44 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-07-06 11:15 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-07-06 11:15 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-07-06 11:15 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-07-06 15:53 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-06 15:53 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " Kees Cook
2020-07-06 15:53 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Kees Cook
2020-07-05 2:54 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Dave Airlie
2020-07-05 2:54 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Dave Airlie
2020-07-05 2:54 ` Dave Airlie
2020-07-04 20:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-04 20:44 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-04 20:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-04 23:34 ` Dave Airlie
2020-07-04 23:34 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Dave Airlie
2020-07-04 23:34 ` Dave Airlie
2020-07-05 2:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-05 2:12 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-05 2:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-05 2:56 ` Dave Airlie
2020-07-05 2:56 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Dave Airlie
2020-07-05 2:56 ` Dave Airlie
2020-07-05 3:23 ` James Bottomley
2020-07-05 3:23 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " James Bottomley
2020-07-05 3:23 ` James Bottomley
2020-07-05 3:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-05 3:26 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-05 3:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-04 21:14 ` Olof Johansson
2020-07-04 21:14 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Olof Johansson
2020-07-04 21:14 ` Olof Johansson
2020-07-04 21:25 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " James Bottomley
2020-07-04 21:25 ` James Bottomley
2020-07-04 21:25 ` James Bottomley
2020-07-04 21:51 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Joe Perches
2020-07-04 21:51 ` Joe Perches
2020-07-04 21:51 ` Joe Perches
2020-07-04 22:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-07-05 11:59 ` Laura Abbott
2020-07-05 16:39 ` James Bottomley
2020-07-05 17:21 ` Chris Mason
2020-07-05 20:26 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-07 2:05 ` Olof Johansson
2020-07-07 2:52 ` James Bottomley
2020-07-07 3:33 ` Dan Williams
2020-07-04 23:39 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Dave Airlie
2020-07-04 23:39 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " Dave Airlie
2020-07-04 23:39 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Dave Airlie
2020-07-05 0:08 ` Joe Perches
2020-07-05 0:08 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " Joe Perches
2020-07-05 0:08 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Joe Perches
2020-07-05 1:32 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-05 1:32 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " Kees Cook
2020-07-05 1:32 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Kees Cook
2020-07-05 17:50 ` opal hart
2020-07-05 17:50 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " opal hart
2020-07-05 17:50 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " opal hart
2020-07-04 23:42 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Dave Airlie
2020-07-04 23:42 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Dave Airlie
2020-07-04 23:42 ` Dave Airlie
2020-07-05 0:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-05 0:12 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-06 7:06 ` NeilBrown
2020-07-06 7:06 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " NeilBrown
2020-07-06 7:06 ` NeilBrown
2020-07-06 7:10 ` NeilBrown
2020-07-06 7:10 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " NeilBrown
2020-07-06 7:10 ` NeilBrown
2020-07-06 7:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-06 7:22 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-06 7:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-06 7:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-07-06 7:53 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-07-06 7:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-07-06 10:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-06 10:22 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-06 10:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-06 12:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-06 12:51 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-06 12:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-06 12:59 ` Joe Perches
2020-07-06 12:59 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Joe Perches
2020-07-06 12:59 ` Joe Perches
2020-07-06 13:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-06 13:04 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-06 13:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-07-06 13:30 ` Joe Perches
2020-07-06 13:30 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Joe Perches
2020-07-06 13:30 ` Joe Perches
2020-07-09 11:11 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-07-09 11:11 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-07-09 11:11 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-07-13 4:25 ` Vinod Koul
2020-07-13 4:25 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Vinod Koul
2020-07-13 4:25 ` Vinod Koul
2020-07-13 15:55 ` Dan Williams
2020-07-13 15:55 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Dan Williams
2020-07-13 15:55 ` Dan Williams
2020-07-05 0:41 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-05 0:41 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Kees Cook
2020-07-05 0:41 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-07 4:30 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Dan Williams
2020-07-07 4:30 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Dan Williams
2020-07-07 4:30 ` Dan Williams
2020-07-10 16:52 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-10 16:52 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-10 16:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-05 4:55 ` Willy Tarreau
2020-07-05 4:55 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Willy Tarreau
2020-07-05 4:55 ` Willy Tarreau
2020-07-06 3:13 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Daniel Palmer
2020-07-06 3:13 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Daniel Palmer
2020-07-06 3:13 ` Daniel Palmer
2020-07-06 12:45 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Chris Mason via Ksummit-discuss
2020-07-06 12:45 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Chris Mason
2020-07-06 12:45 ` Chris Mason
2020-07-06 14:06 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Laurent Pinchart
2020-07-06 14:06 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Laurent Pinchart
2020-07-06 14:06 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-07-06 15:55 ` Chris Mason via Ksummit-discuss
2020-07-06 15:55 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Chris Mason
2020-07-06 15:55 ` Chris Mason
2020-07-06 16:06 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-07-06 16:06 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Mike Rapoport
2020-07-06 16:06 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-07-07 4:17 ` Dan Williams
2020-07-07 4:17 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Dan Williams
2020-07-07 4:17 ` Dan Williams
2020-07-06 15:22 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-07-06 15:22 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Arvind Sankar
2020-07-06 15:22 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-07-06 15:40 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Steven Rostedt
2020-07-06 15:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-06 15:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-06 13:23 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Tibor Raschko
2020-07-06 13:23 ` Tibor Raschko
2020-07-06 16:29 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-06 16:29 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-06 16:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-07 4:00 ` Dan Williams
2020-07-07 4:00 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Dan Williams
2020-07-07 4:00 ` Dan Williams
2020-07-07 5:56 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-07 5:56 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Kees Cook
2020-07-07 5:56 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-07 6:49 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-07-07 6:49 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Mike Rapoport
2020-07-07 6:49 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-07-07 13:37 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Steven Rostedt
2020-07-07 13:37 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " Steven Rostedt
2020-07-07 13:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-07 15:24 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Bird, Tim
2020-07-07 15:24 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " Bird, Tim
2020-07-07 15:24 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Bird, Tim
2020-07-07 15:33 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-07-07 15:33 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " Randy Dunlap
2020-07-07 15:33 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Randy Dunlap
2020-07-07 15:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-07 15:41 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " Steven Rostedt
2020-07-07 15:41 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Steven Rostedt
2020-07-07 15:55 ` Bird, Tim [this message]
2020-07-07 15:55 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " Bird, Tim
2020-07-07 15:55 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Bird, Tim
2020-07-07 6:56 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Harrosh, Boaz
2020-07-07 6:56 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Harrosh, Boaz
2020-07-07 6:56 ` Harrosh, Boaz
2020-07-07 8:54 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-07 8:54 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Kees Cook
2020-07-07 8:54 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-07 13:41 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Steven Rostedt
2020-07-07 13:41 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " Steven Rostedt
2020-07-07 14:45 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Mike Rapoport
2020-07-07 14:45 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " Mike Rapoport
2020-07-07 14:45 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Mike Rapoport
2020-07-07 20:56 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-07 20:56 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " Kees Cook
2020-07-07 20:56 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Kees Cook
2020-07-07 21:48 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Arvind Sankar
2020-07-07 21:48 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Arvind Sankar
2020-07-07 21:48 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-07-07 12:13 ` Mark Brown
2020-07-07 12:13 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Mark Brown
2020-07-07 12:13 ` Mark Brown
2020-07-06 18:30 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Shuah Khan
2020-07-06 18:30 ` Shuah Khan
2020-07-06 18:30 ` Shuah Khan
2020-07-06 23:58 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Tibor Raschko
2020-07-06 23:58 ` Tibor Raschko
2020-07-09 10:43 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-07-09 10:43 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-07-09 16:01 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Shuah Khan
2020-07-09 16:01 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " Shuah Khan
2020-07-09 16:01 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Shuah Khan
2020-07-09 16:13 ` Mark Brown
2020-07-09 16:13 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " Mark Brown
2020-07-09 16:13 ` Mark Brown
2020-07-09 16:32 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " James Bottomley
2020-07-09 16:32 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " James Bottomley
2020-07-09 16:32 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " James Bottomley
2020-07-09 16:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-09 16:35 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " Steven Rostedt
2020-07-09 16:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-10 9:38 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Tibor Raschko
2020-07-10 9:38 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " Tibor Raschko
2020-07-07 4:04 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Dan Williams
2020-07-07 4:04 ` Dan Williams
2020-07-07 4:04 ` Dan Williams
2020-07-06 19:15 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Mark Brown
2020-07-06 19:15 ` Mark Brown
2020-07-06 19:15 ` Mark Brown
2020-07-07 0:48 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Tibor Raschko
2020-07-07 0:48 ` Tibor Raschko
2020-07-07 0:48 ` Tibor Raschko
2020-07-07 21:26 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Arvind Sankar
2020-07-07 21:26 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-07-07 21:26 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-07-07 23:54 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Tibor Raschko
2020-07-07 23:54 ` Tibor Raschko
2020-07-07 23:54 ` Tibor Raschko
2020-07-07 4:08 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Dan Williams
2020-07-07 4:08 ` Dan Williams
2020-07-07 4:08 ` Dan Williams
2020-07-07 9:36 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Mark Brown
2020-07-07 9:36 ` Mark Brown
2020-07-07 9:36 ` Mark Brown
2020-07-06 21:31 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-06 21:31 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-06 21:31 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-06 22:10 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Steven Rostedt
2020-07-06 22:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-06 22:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-06 22:17 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-06 22:17 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-06 22:17 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-06 22:28 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Steven Rostedt
2020-07-06 22:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-06 22:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-07-06 23:03 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-06 23:03 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-06 23:03 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-08 3:42 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Stephen Hemminger
2020-07-08 3:42 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " Stephen Hemminger
2020-07-08 3:42 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] " Stephen Hemminger
2020-07-08 10:51 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-08 10:51 ` [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] " Pavel Begunkov
2020-07-07 6:56 ` SeongJae Park via Ksummit-discuss
2020-07-07 6:56 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " SeongJae Park
2020-07-07 6:56 ` SeongJae Park
2020-07-08 7:12 ` Dan Williams
2020-07-08 7:12 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Dan Williams
2020-07-08 7:12 ` Dan Williams
2020-07-08 9:28 ` SeongJae Park via Ksummit-discuss
2020-07-08 9:28 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " SeongJae Park
2020-07-08 9:28 ` SeongJae Park
2020-07-07 7:51 ` Christian Brauner
2020-07-07 7:51 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Christian Brauner
2020-07-07 7:51 ` Christian Brauner
2020-07-08 18:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-07-08 18:40 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Daniel Vetter
2020-07-17 8:35 ` Pavel Machek
2020-07-17 8:35 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Pavel Machek
2020-07-17 8:35 ` Pavel Machek
2020-07-26 15:30 ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Laurent Pinchart
2020-07-26 15:30 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Laurent Pinchart
2020-07-26 15:30 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CY4PR13MB11754FCF904BA5C0A31EA7D2FD660@CY4PR13MB1175.namprd13.prod.outlook.com \
--to=tim.bird@sony.com \
--cc=clm@fb.clm \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.