From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"Huang Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>, "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>,
"huang ying" <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>,
"Zheng Yan" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bisected regression, v3.5 -> next-20120724: PCI PM causes USB hotplug failure
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 17:44:04 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1207291739460.26196-100000@netrider.rowland.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABb+yY2G7VurriJEbo-5WXY0kpyBB0cEWeACDDv++AHcKFZ+hQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> >
> > For me there's also an issue of style: If you do a synchronous get then it
> > looks odd not to do a synchronous put. My feeling has always been that
> > the async routines are for use in non-process contexts, where the sync
> > routines can't be used. Using them just to return a little more
> > quickly is a foreign idea.
> >
> Another way of looking at it is - I need h/w to be active in order to
> proceed so I call get_sync but I don't care if the h/w is not put down
> immediately after I am done using it. So the put could be
> relaxed/async - At best, we could avoid an unnecessary suspend-resume
> cycle which could be expensive power and time wise. At worst, we
> return a bit quicker. Or so do I think.
If the reason for the choice is to opportunistically delay suspending,
there are better ways of doing it: pm_schedule_suspend,
pm_runtime_put_autosuspend.
Alan Stern
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-29 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1207241312050.1164-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
[not found] ` <87r4s0opck.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
2012-07-25 4:08 ` bisected regression, v3.5 -> next-20120724: PCI PM causes USB hotplug failure Bjørn Mork
2012-07-25 4:34 ` Huang Ying
2012-07-25 9:58 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-07-25 13:30 ` huang ying
2012-07-25 13:58 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-07-25 18:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-25 20:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-25 22:36 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-07-26 2:38 ` Huang Ying
2012-07-26 2:38 ` Huang Ying
2012-07-26 8:54 ` Huang Ying
2012-07-26 10:35 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-07-26 11:02 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-07-26 12:04 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-07-26 15:03 ` Alan Stern
2012-07-26 16:24 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-07-27 5:35 ` Huang Ying
2012-07-27 9:11 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-07-30 3:15 ` Huang Ying
2012-07-30 8:08 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-07-30 13:31 ` huang ying
2012-07-30 16:57 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-07-31 0:22 ` Huang Ying
2012-07-30 14:19 ` Alan Stern
2012-07-31 0:24 ` Huang Ying
2012-07-31 3:18 ` Huang Ying
2012-07-31 17:07 ` Alan Stern
2012-07-27 15:03 ` Alan Stern
2012-07-27 19:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-27 19:39 ` Alan Stern
2012-07-27 19:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-28 16:12 ` Alan Stern
2012-07-28 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-28 21:12 ` Alan Stern
2012-07-29 13:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-29 14:55 ` Alan Stern
2012-07-29 19:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-31 20:31 ` Do we need asynchronous pm_runtime_get()? (was: Re: bisected regression ...) Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-31 21:05 ` Alan Stern
2012-07-31 21:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-31 21:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-01 14:36 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-01 21:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-02 20:16 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-02 21:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-03 2:20 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-03 3:37 ` Ming Lei
2012-08-03 14:28 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-04 19:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-04 20:25 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-04 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-04 20:48 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-04 21:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-04 22:13 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-05 15:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-06 13:30 ` Ming Lei
2012-08-06 14:47 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-07 1:35 ` Ming Lei
2012-08-07 11:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-07 15:14 ` Ming Lei
2012-08-07 15:42 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-07 16:30 ` Ming Lei
2012-08-07 20:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-07 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-08 2:02 ` Ming Lei
2012-08-08 18:42 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-08 20:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-09 5:55 ` Ming Lei
2012-08-09 10:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-09 10:55 ` Ming Lei
2012-08-09 19:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-10 3:19 ` Ming Lei
2012-08-10 20:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-08 22:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-06 15:48 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-06 20:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-07 12:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-07 17:15 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-07 21:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-03 14:05 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-04 20:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-04 20:42 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-04 20:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-04 19:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-29 20:12 ` bisected regression, v3.5 -> next-20120724: PCI PM causes USB hotplug failure Jassi Brar
2012-07-29 21:44 ` Alan Stern [this message]
2012-07-25 19:51 ` [PATCH] PCI / PM: Fix messages printed by acpi_pci_set_power_state() Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-25 20:02 ` Alan Stern
2012-07-25 20:48 ` [PATCH][update] " Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1207291739460.26196-100000@netrider.rowland.org \
--to=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com \
--cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.