From: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>, robh@kernel.org, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, conor.culhane@silvaco.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, jirislaby@kernel.org, joe@perches.com, linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, zbigniew.lukwinski@linux.intel.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] dt-bindings: i3c: svc: add compatible string i3c: silvaco,i3c-target-v1 Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 15:44:52 -0500 [thread overview] Message-ID: <ZabqxHD4wtiPn6ep@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810> (raw) In-Reply-To: <4a9ed1ca-cd13-4b61-af06-a3d7935aeeee@linaro.org> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 09:30:24PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 16/01/2024 20:13, Frank Li wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 06:23:09PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:35:44PM -0500, Frank Li wrote: > >>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 09:48:08AM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > >>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:33:48AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>>>> On 16/01/2024 10:30, Conor Dooley wrote: > >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 08:24:20AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>>>>>> On 16/01/2024 03:29, Frank Li wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> Patches were accepted after discussion, what you ponit to. So I > >>>>>>>>>> think everyone agree on the name 'silvaco,i3c-master-v1'. > >>>>>>>>>> I plan send next version to fix auto build error. Any additional > >>>>>>>>>> comments about this? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I still do not see how did you address Rob's comment and his point is > >>>>>>>>> valid. You just did not reply to it. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> See https://lore.kernel.org/imx/ZXCiaKfMYYShoiXK@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810/ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> First of all, that's not the answer to Rob's email, but some other > >>>>>>> thread which is 99% ignored by Rob (unless he has filters for > >>>>>>> "@Rob"...). Therefore no, it does not count as valid answer. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Second, explanation does not make sense. There is no argument granting > >>>>>>> you exception from SoC specific compatibles. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The patch could have been applied two months ago had Frank done as > >>>>>> was requested (multiple times). I don't understand the resistance > >>>>>> towards doing so given the process has taken way way longer as a result. > >>>>> > >>>>> I think that Rob's comment was just skipped and original master binding > >>>>> was merged without addressing it. I don't want to repeat the same > >>>>> process for the "target". Indeed I could point this earlier... if I only > >>>>> knew that Rob pointed out that issue. > >>>> > >>>> Oh I think I got confused here. The context for this mail led me to > >>>> think that this was still trying to push the i3c-master-v1 stuff through > >>>> and I was commenting on my frustration with the resistance to applying > >>>> the feedback received. I didn't realise that this was for another > >>>> patch adding a target. > >>>> > >>>> I think you already said it, but NAK to adding any more compatibles here > >>>> until the soc-specific compatible that was asked for for the imx93 is > >>>> added. > >>> > >>> Is it okay for 'silvaco,i3c-target-imx93'? > > No, because imx93 is product of NXP, not Silvaco. > > You need regular SoC-block compatibles, just like we have for all other > snps, dwc and cdns. "nxp,imx93-svc-i3c-target" ? Just little bit strange for binding file name is silvaco,i3c-master.yaml. look like "dwc,*" compatitble string's file name is "dwc,*".yaml. Frank > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>, robh@kernel.org, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, conor.culhane@silvaco.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, jirislaby@kernel.org, joe@perches.com, linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, zbigniew.lukwinski@linux.intel.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] dt-bindings: i3c: svc: add compatible string i3c: silvaco,i3c-target-v1 Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 15:44:52 -0500 [thread overview] Message-ID: <ZabqxHD4wtiPn6ep@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810> (raw) In-Reply-To: <4a9ed1ca-cd13-4b61-af06-a3d7935aeeee@linaro.org> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 09:30:24PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 16/01/2024 20:13, Frank Li wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 06:23:09PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:35:44PM -0500, Frank Li wrote: > >>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 09:48:08AM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > >>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:33:48AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>>>> On 16/01/2024 10:30, Conor Dooley wrote: > >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 08:24:20AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>>>>>> On 16/01/2024 03:29, Frank Li wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> Patches were accepted after discussion, what you ponit to. So I > >>>>>>>>>> think everyone agree on the name 'silvaco,i3c-master-v1'. > >>>>>>>>>> I plan send next version to fix auto build error. Any additional > >>>>>>>>>> comments about this? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I still do not see how did you address Rob's comment and his point is > >>>>>>>>> valid. You just did not reply to it. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> See https://lore.kernel.org/imx/ZXCiaKfMYYShoiXK@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810/ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> First of all, that's not the answer to Rob's email, but some other > >>>>>>> thread which is 99% ignored by Rob (unless he has filters for > >>>>>>> "@Rob"...). Therefore no, it does not count as valid answer. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Second, explanation does not make sense. There is no argument granting > >>>>>>> you exception from SoC specific compatibles. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The patch could have been applied two months ago had Frank done as > >>>>>> was requested (multiple times). I don't understand the resistance > >>>>>> towards doing so given the process has taken way way longer as a result. > >>>>> > >>>>> I think that Rob's comment was just skipped and original master binding > >>>>> was merged without addressing it. I don't want to repeat the same > >>>>> process for the "target". Indeed I could point this earlier... if I only > >>>>> knew that Rob pointed out that issue. > >>>> > >>>> Oh I think I got confused here. The context for this mail led me to > >>>> think that this was still trying to push the i3c-master-v1 stuff through > >>>> and I was commenting on my frustration with the resistance to applying > >>>> the feedback received. I didn't realise that this was for another > >>>> patch adding a target. > >>>> > >>>> I think you already said it, but NAK to adding any more compatibles here > >>>> until the soc-specific compatible that was asked for for the imx93 is > >>>> added. > >>> > >>> Is it okay for 'silvaco,i3c-target-imx93'? > > No, because imx93 is product of NXP, not Silvaco. > > You need regular SoC-block compatibles, just like we have for all other > snps, dwc and cdns. "nxp,imx93-svc-i3c-target" ? Just little bit strange for binding file name is silvaco,i3c-master.yaml. look like "dwc,*" compatitble string's file name is "dwc,*".yaml. Frank > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > -- linux-i3c mailing list linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-16 20:45 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-01-10 17:52 [PATCH v2 0/7] I3C target mode support Frank Li 2024-01-10 17:52 ` Frank Li 2024-01-10 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] i3c: add " Frank Li 2024-01-10 17:52 ` Frank Li 2024-01-10 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] dt-bindings: i3c: svc: add compatible string i3c: silvaco,i3c-target-v1 Frank Li 2024-01-10 17:52 ` Frank Li 2024-01-12 7:38 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-12 7:38 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-12 15:31 ` Frank Li 2024-01-12 15:31 ` Frank Li 2024-01-12 15:50 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-12 15:50 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-12 16:00 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-12 16:00 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-12 16:06 ` Frank Li 2024-01-12 16:06 ` Frank Li 2024-01-15 19:44 ` Frank Li 2024-01-15 19:44 ` Frank Li 2024-01-15 20:38 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-15 20:38 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-16 2:29 ` Frank Li 2024-01-16 2:29 ` Frank Li 2024-01-16 7:24 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-16 7:24 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-16 9:30 ` Conor Dooley 2024-01-16 9:30 ` Conor Dooley 2024-01-16 9:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-16 9:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-16 9:48 ` Conor Dooley 2024-01-16 9:48 ` Conor Dooley 2024-01-16 17:35 ` Frank Li 2024-01-16 17:35 ` Frank Li 2024-01-16 18:23 ` Conor Dooley 2024-01-16 18:23 ` Conor Dooley 2024-01-16 19:13 ` Frank Li 2024-01-16 19:13 ` Frank Li 2024-01-16 20:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-16 20:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-16 20:44 ` Frank Li [this message] 2024-01-16 20:44 ` Frank Li 2024-01-16 20:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-16 20:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-16 21:01 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-16 21:01 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-16 22:25 ` Frank Li 2024-01-16 22:25 ` Frank Li 2024-01-17 6:50 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-17 6:50 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-17 16:19 ` Frank Li 2024-01-17 16:19 ` Frank Li 2024-01-17 17:15 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-17 17:15 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-17 18:06 ` Frank Li 2024-01-17 18:06 ` Frank Li 2024-01-19 17:13 ` Frank Li 2024-01-19 17:13 ` Frank Li 2024-01-16 21:31 ` Frank Li 2024-01-16 21:31 ` Frank Li 2024-01-17 6:45 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-17 6:45 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski 2024-01-10 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] Documentation: i3c: Add I3C target mode controller and function Frank Li 2024-01-10 17:52 ` Frank Li 2024-01-11 23:45 ` kernel test robot 2024-01-11 23:45 ` kernel test robot 2024-01-10 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] i3c: target: add svc target controller support Frank Li 2024-01-10 17:52 ` Frank Li 2024-01-11 10:01 ` kernel test robot 2024-01-11 10:01 ` kernel test robot 2024-01-11 13:49 ` kernel test robot 2024-01-11 13:49 ` kernel test robot 2024-01-10 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] i3c: target: func: add tty driver Frank Li 2024-01-10 17:52 ` Frank Li 2024-01-10 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] i3c: add API i3c_dev_gettstatus_format1() to get target device status Frank Li 2024-01-10 17:52 ` Frank Li 2024-01-10 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] tty: i3c: add TTY over I3C master support Frank Li 2024-01-10 17:52 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=ZabqxHD4wtiPn6ep@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810 \ --to=frank.li@nxp.com \ --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \ --cc=conor.culhane@silvaco.com \ --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \ --cc=conor@kernel.org \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \ --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \ --cc=joe@perches.com \ --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \ --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \ --cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \ --cc=robh@kernel.org \ --cc=zbigniew.lukwinski@linux.intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.